Microsoft Surface: Hardware is not the problem

Ben Gracewood

Attending the NZ launch of the Microsoft Surface 2 and Surface Pro 2 yesterday was quite weird. You might know that for the last couple of years I had been heavily invested in the Microsoft platform. I literally relied on Microsoft and Windows 8 to feed my kids. Not anymore.

So I looked on dispassionately as the Microsoft people enthusiastically extolled the virtues of these second-gen tablets. Lighter! Faster! More ports! More battery! All wonderful stuff. The Surface 2 in particular is massively better than the Surface RT it replaces (and that Microsoft are strangely still selling – I’m guessing they have a stuffload of inventory to run out). Where the RT was embarrassingly slow, the Surface 2 is buttery smooth. I can’t tell you how enraged we were as developers when our gorgeous apps ran like s**t on ARM Win8 tablets. I’m glad Microsoft have fixed this. The latest generation of ARM Win8 tablets are all but perfect.

The Intel-based Surface Pro 2 is a beast. You can get one for $1299, but fully kitted out it will cost you closer to $2500. That high-end model is stupendous: 8GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD, it runs faster than most laptops and is still incredibly small and light. I don’t exaggerate when I say that the Surface Pro 2 is the best bit of Windows hardware anywhere. It’ll run Photoshop properly, and give you a full digitiser to use while doing it.

The new covers are great too. There’s one with an optional battery, and the keyboard covers have been greatly improved with backlighting and weight reductions.

But (there’s always a but) while hardware is certainly a problem Microsoft needed to solve, it is not the problem Microsoft currently has.

Questions to the presenters about the hardware were easily answered (“yeah this s**t is awesome! It has 72 graphics cores!”), deeper questions about the platform resulted in the waffle that is the signature of a corporate employee saying “yeah we have a problem there but I’m going to pretend we don’t”.

When asked about the target markets and uptake of the previous model Surfaces, the response was “yeah we’re not sure what has been holding back uptake of the Surface Pro”. To be fair, Microsoft hasn’t had a corporate reseller channel for Surface, instead directing companies to buy from Noel Leeming or JB Hifi in NZ. This has been sorted out now, so I wonder if that will reverse the trend. But in any case I was really surprised that they admitted Surface Pro uptake has been disappointing. The $900 million write-down was on the Surface RT after all, not the Pro.

When I asked about corporate apps and uptake, I got the same answers I myself was shilling a year ago.

Conversations about exactly the same couple of companies testing the water, and the same prototype apps that have gone nowhere in 12 months. No big-bang stories of corporates buying Surfaces (or any other Win8 tablet) by the thousand. That’s pretty sad, especially when you consider that the New Zealand Police rolled out iPads and iPhones to all front-line staff in that same 12 months.

Can Microsoft reverse this trend? I reckon these new Surface revisions are the right tools to do that job, but I’m seriously wondering if Microsoft can ever win back that portable device mindshare it has lost to Apple and Android. Still, 12 months is a lifetime in tech, and I hope Microsoft can surprise us over the next year.

Ben Gracewood is a development manager at Vend. He blogs at BenGeek.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about My Tags

Post Comment

8 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

$2500 fully kitted out...
Tell me again why you would get this, over a Macbook Air, or a Macbook Pro?


This is a very good question.


What advantages does this surface have over say.. a train. Which I could also afford.


If you are considering buying Surface Pro you will probably not consider buying MacBook but alternative PC. Number of people that knows that Macbooks can run Windows is small and ever smaller is number of people who would buy Macbooks to run Windows.

If you are considering buying MacBook you are only comparing Pro vs Air (and their options) - and Surface Pro does not make a cut because it doesn't run OSX.

So the real question is: "why would you run Windows instead of OSX" (or vice versa)?


Many people would not buy a Mac because they are not familiar with Macs. Also, Macs don't run Windows apps. They also don't have a start button, and you get that FOR FREE with Windows 8.1 on the new Surfaces.


That is an absolutely spot on hilarious observation!


Answer: Stylus + Photoshop = goodness.


In fact the new Surface 2 Pro has a number of advantages. For a more complete & less disillusioned view read the review on You can get SSD sizes from 64 to 512GB which only Dell offer in PC world & Apple. And it is not expensive compared to a Lenovo Helix


Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.7740 -0.0003 -0.04%
AUD 0.9511 0.0005 0.05%
EUR 0.6324 -0.0002 -0.03%
GBP 0.4954 0.0001 0.02%
HKD 6.0039 0.0001 0.00%
JPY 92.5100 -0.0050 -0.01%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1195.4 -2.890 2014-12-19T00:
Oil Brent 61.4 1.580 2014-12-19T00:
Oil Nymex 57.1 2.910 2014-12-19T00:
Silver Index 16.0 0.096 2014-12-19T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5518.5 5545.0 5539.3 -0.21%
NASDAQ 4752.6 4782.1 4748.4 0.36%
DAX 9901.3 9901.3 9811.1 -0.25%
DJI 17778.0 17874.0 17778.2 0.15%
FTSE 6466.0 6566.9 6466.0 1.23%
HKSE 23158.3 23189.6 22832.2 1.25%
NI225 17511.0 17621.4 17210.0 2.39%