Millions are wasted on doomed law wish list
Parliament should weed out single-issue private members' bills which have no hope of making it, a leading academic says.
Otago University Associate Professor Nick Wilson makes the suggestion after publication of the first study into the cost of law-making in New Zealand.
It found that a new act costs on average $3.5 million, while a regulation costs about $530,000.
New Zealand passes about 19 new laws a year.
The Otago research focused on public health legislation, and whether a law is as cost-effective as a media or public education campaign.
Researchers analysed the number of acts and regulations passed in Parliament from 1999 to 2010, and considered the costs of debating the new laws in parliament and policy advice from government agencies.
Prof Wilson told NBR ONLINE while our system is relatively efficient, much time and money is still wasted on debating pointless bills.
"It's silly, really, that bills may have had millions of dollars of parliamentary time put into them, and they never make it. A certain degree of improved 'project management' could make things more efficient."
He says political parties could be consulted at an early stage, which would improve the chances of any new legislation actually progressing.
Prof Wilson says changes could also include limiting tactics used by political parties to stall the progress of legislation for no good reason.
While New Zealand's system is not without its problems, the process in the United States is far less efficient.
"We looked at the laws passed by US state governments, and 82% of those introduced in 2009 were never enacted. In New Zealand, the government is only introducing bills it knows will pass," he says.
Prof Wilson says New Zealand's single-house parliamentary system is an advantage.
In overseas jurisdictions with an upper house, legislation can be stalled for a very long time.
New Zealand politicians and political parties also do not engage in "partisan taunts" as much as they do in the US, he says.
An analysis of one US politician's media releases shows 27% of them were simply "taunting" his opposition and contained little substance.
The releases of New Zealand political parties showed just 5% were partisan taunts.
The most cost-effective legislation appears to be those which are "self-enforcing", Prof Wilson says.
"The law banning smoking in pubs and restaurants has had very little enforcement costs required.
"It has just been part of a change in social attitudes, and that makes it self-enforcing."
Prof Wilson says enforcing the speed limit, on the other hand, requires considerable cost because people often do not adhere to those rules.






















Comments and questions16
THIS IS A GOOD THING.
We should have more of it, not less. There's an old saying that people's liberty is never more threatened when the House of Representatives is sitting.
Having busybody politicians spending more time debating laws that will never pass strikes me as a highly desirable thing. We have enough laws.
And how much does it cost the taxpayer to keep professors coming up with useless information.
Actually the Professor speaks some sense; a bit unusual for our University academics.
The point he is making is possible beyond the comprehension of the interlectual capacity of our citizens, if the two comments @3.31 and 4.18 are an example of the masses.
DOH!!
The "professor and you forgot to deduct fixed costs!!
Typical of peeps that can't hold down a real job.
Interesting - and who decides which bills have no hope of passing?
I'll volunteer, I think $100,000pa would be a reasonable amount of remuneration - I'm not greedy
A key law I want to see passed, is a law to reduce the number of lunatics in the asylum.
The lunatics are in the asylum because of the lunatics outside the asylum who put them in there in the first place.
The problem is, that as soon as any perfectly sane people, say you and I, enter parliament, we become lunatics as well.
Good and proper law is natural and does not require enactment, amendment or repeal.
Our legal heritage is customary law, which is the origin and basis for English common law. Customary law is based on custom, i.e. the habits, practices and usages of practical people resolving problems and getting on with their lives.
Enacted law, to the extent that it codifies customary law, is redundant, and to the extent it modifies it risks introducing power and interest-group politics into our lives.
Cost effective legislation is not what we need, what we need is cost effective law, i.e. cost effective ways of resolving disputes and coordinating beneficial interactions. We have what we need, in our heritage and our culture, if only we can throw off the yolk of legislation.
Any wonder when Governing parties waste time passing laws that only serve their own political agenda and not the general welfare of the Nation.
To Morrison 6.47 Monday.
I held down a very good, responsible well paid career, such that I was able to retire at 55.
One doesn't achieve this status by being a peep that cany hold down a real job.
What do you do Morrison ..Trade Union secretary??
Self employed!!
There are many useless peeps employed by the taxpayer that are "retired" @ 55. Why? Because self employed producers are taxed too high. That's why.
Ah ha Prof - if it's efficiency and cost saving that counts, let's not have ANY parliamentary debate. The Government could just make laws however and whenever they like.
It wouldn't be democracy, but it would be efficient and save costs.
Maybe there is something we value about democracy that can't be measured simply in terms of efficiency and cost savings.
Maybe that even applies to other things as well.....
Isn't Nick Wilson Associate Professor of Public Health at Otago University in Wellington? So where does this fit into public health?
Quite some time ago we the people asked that the number of MP's be reduced; this has conveniently,but not unsuprisingly, sunk without trace.
This would be a surefire way of cutting down the number of useless,selfserving bills.
Willie Getonwithit
An even better idea would be to weed out the useless politicians to cut the number down.
This was the wish of we the people many years ago but has of course disappeared without trace.
Willie Getonwithit