Member log in

Mining lobby dismisses claims of power grab in RMA reforms

The mining lobby group Straterra says the government is right to try and improve the operation of the Resource Management Act and dismisses environmental groups' claims of a ministerial power grab as "rubbish".

"We all want the same thing, a robust framework for assessing development proposals against economic, environmental, social and cultural criteria," Straterra chief executive Chris Baker says in a statement.

"But we want that to be a workable framework, not a frustrating framework, and that's what we have now."

Environment Minister Amy Adams hit out at criticism from the Environmental Defence Society, New Zealand Forest & Bird Protection Society, the New Zealand Fish and Game Council and others, accusing them of making misleading statements about the proposed reforms, which were published last week for public submissions.

"Contrary to claims, core environmental protections have been maintained in the RMA and will, in many cases, be strengthened by the government's proposals," she said.

Mr Baker says "accusations of a central government power grab are rubbish when it is considered that councils will still be in charge of writing plans, with public input, from the ground up".

"The government already has the power of intervention at the local level - what this reform package does is provide criteria around when that is or is not appropriate. Who would argue with that?"

Ms Adams will take the stage this Saturday with EDS director Gary Taylor in a discussion of the RMA proposals at the annual conference of the National Party's Blue-Greens, a grouping within the party that seeks to promote environmental sustainability in the party's policy-making.

(BusinessDesk)

Comments and questions
3

National should be far more cautious than to centralise RMA powers. While they may believe they are invincible, history shows that at either the next election or the one following a Labour/Greens coalition will be in power. Imagine what they will do with increased powers of intervention.

Nothing changes from the present situation where Environment Court commissioners are politically appointed and push their own agenda. There is also suspicion that politicians in the last government influenced the selection of a favoured environment judge for a particular case. This proposal will make the whole process transparent and the minister accountable.

There are only a few questions that I'd like answered:
1) where will your grandchildren live if there is no reform of the RMA? New Zealand or Australia?
2) do we want a high wage society, or low wage economy? If low wage, how will education, superannuation and health services be financed? Will the Greens just print money like Robert Mugabe?
3) will those who oppose reforms to the RMA give up all devices and luxuries made from products of mining in other countries? If not, they are just hypocrites, enjoying the spoils of mining done in other countries.
4) what will a house cost under a Greens-Labour nightmare? Will one be allowed to use copper for electricity, gas for cooking, steel for support or roofing, cement for foundations, metal for joinery, glass for windows, etc. etc. ?
I look forward to all the enlightened Green responses.