National has enough support to pass Hobbit law - but PM wants more
National has support from all its partner parties in moving to clarify industrial relations laws within the film industry, Economic Development Minister Gerry Brownlee says.
National is this afternoon pushing labour law amendments through Parliament under urgency as part of a deal with Warner Bros to ensure the two Hobbit movies are filmed in New Zealand.
Mr Brownlee said the bill would clarify that people employed as contractors on film productions were contractors and couldn't use courts to change their status to employees.
Prime Minister John Key and ministers have spent the past two days in crisis meetings with studio representatives to convince them to keep filming in New Zealand -- something which looked shaky after actors' unions threatened industrial action over terms and conditions.
Warner Bros also pushed for a bigger tax break than the standard 15 percent for big movies, and requests for more sweeteners were partially met with a commitment by the Government to provide a $13 million marketing subsidy and an extra $20m tax break for the $630 million films.
Labour and the Greens have welcomed the fact the films will stay here, but expressed outrage that the Government had bowed to pressure from a business to have employment legislation changed.
The ACT Party and United Future supported the Government's moves, and Mr Brownlee said in Parliament today that the Maori Party had also come on board in support.
That gives the Government a clear voting majority of 69 to 53.
Mr Brownlee earlier told reporters the Government had been forced to offer more incentives than would have been the case "had there not been that dreadful seven week period of threat and industrial action".
PM wants more than a legislative win
Presumably for the sake of consensus, Prime Minister John Key has also reached out to the Maori Party on the issue.
Mr Key said he would also talk to Labour.
Clearly, the prime minister doesn't just want to win the vote - he's also trying to close down the "banana republic" debate by building a cross-party consensus.
However, aggressive comments by Labour's Trevor Mallard seem, for the time being, to mitigate against that outcome.
The Australian-based Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA), and New Zealand Actors Equity (NZAE), which initially rattled the cage with its demands, withdrew before Warners representatives arrived here and gave an assurance there would not be industrial action during filming.
The unions avoided commenting on the stoush today, but said they welcomed the news a deal had been negotiated to keep the films here.
Council of Trade Unions president Helen Kelly said no one would begrudge the films being shot here, but that it was outrageous and unnecessary to change labour laws at the request of a foreign corporation.
She said unions had given an assurance to Warner Bros that there wouldn't be disruptions to filming, but that had been undermined by Mr Key.
Signup to free NBR email alerts here
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit















Comments and questions10
Ms Kelly has learnt she is not quite the big man she thought she was.
"outrageous and unnecessary to change labour laws at the request of a foreign corporation" -- but thanks to the efforts of the MEAA, Actors' Equity, the CTU (and an Outrageous spokeswoman), it became not just necessary but inevitable. For shame.
I cant believe the hypocrisy that reared its head during (and after) this whole boycott thing. One of them was when R. Malcolm said that all of this could've been avoided if it were handled maturely, the pres. of NZ Equity said that all it was asking for was for their requests which were "minuscule" to be heard, the pres. of CTU called Sir Peter Jackson a "brat" and now the same pres. of CTU says that its "outrageous and unnecessary to change labour laws at the request of a foreign corporation." When the whole problem started with a FOREIGN UNION issuing a WORLDWIDE BOYCOTT. Mind-boggling!
I cant believe the hypocrisy that reared its head during (and after) this whole boycott thing. One of them was when R. Malcolm said that all of this could've been avoided if it were handled maturely, the pres. of NZ Equity said that all it was asking for was for their requests which were "minuscule" to be heard, the pres. of CTU called Sir Peter Jackson a "brat" and now the same pres. of CTU says that its "outrageous and unnecessary to change labour laws at the request of a foreign corporation." When the whole problem started with a FOREIGN UNION issuing a WORLDWIDE BOYCOTT. Mind-boggling!
We should have let it go just to show that the unions are back with a vengance leading the gullible.Whate a collection - Hellen Kelly, Matt McCarten and Andrew Little. You might just have a few problems coming your way Mr Goff - Andrew Little wants your job and is prepared to see you thrashed come election time to get it. Still you are only "Philin in" aren't you??
"Labour and the Greens have welcomed the fact the films will stay here, but expressed outrage that the Government had bowed to pressure..."
John Key takes the ball and scores a match winning try for NZ.
Labour & the Greens sit in the grandstand like plump school girls, hissing with envy.
if anyone thinks that usa movie makers warner, demanded that nz
change the countries laws to make the movie in nz, then they believe in
santa. imagine nz telling anyone that if they want to trade with us ,they must change their countries laws. the spin on this by john key is treating nz as a country of idiots. a disgrace as the government is using this as a free attack on unions and all workers in all walks of life.
national are the worst government in nz history.
Well Done, John Key.
Labour & Greens should do more meaningful actions rather than just speaking.
poor unions,wasnt it unions, and foreign ones at that,interfering in our trade which caused this farce in the first place?Their inept bullying tactics have exposed them for the tired labour party stooges they are.
Actually Adrian ; 10.27; this problem was caused by a Supreme Court Judge who didn't understand the difference in meaning of the words Employee. and Contractor.
A quick look into an Oxford dictionary would have cleared his head; and this situation would not have evolved from his foolish ill-informed judgement.
Sadly this event is really a comment on the comprehension skills of some of our so called 'learned' judiciary.
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below