National ministers justify suspension of democracy at Ecan
“The important work of water management cannot be rushed,” Local Government Minister David Carter says.
He was justifying the refusal of the National government to return Environment Canterbury to democratically elected representation after removing councillors and appointing commissioners in 2010.
“We must build on the momentum the commissioners have achieved,” Environment Minister Amy Adams says.
The pair were quizzed by media today when they announced the news and claimed it had widespread support.
They were accompanied by commissioners Dame Margaret Bazley and former Labour MP David Caygill.
Mr Caygill highlighted the faster clearance rate for resource consent processing under the commissioners.
When asked about the volume of consents being processed, he was unaware of the numbers but admitted there were considerably fewer than when the commissioners were appointed.
The commissioners have also placed a moratorium on water consent applications in the Hurunui catchment and mid-Canterbury.
The Canterbury earthquakes were another delay reason advanced by Mr Carter and Ms Adams.
When queried about what specifically had been delayed by the earthquakes, Mr Caygill said appointments to two water management zone committees had been delayed.
One journalist raised a regional plan in Manawatu which was adopted this week, asking whether Environment Canterbury under its commissioners would be any quicker than the five years taken over the Horizons regional council’s One Plan.
Mr Caygill said the One Plan might yet face a final court appeal.
Ms Adams and Mr Caygill highlighted how the legislation empowering the Environment Canterbury commissioners allows limited rights of appeal over district plans, speeding up the process.
Dame Bazley made a brief statement saying how it had been “a joy” to work with staff at Environment Canterbury.
In response to a question, Mr Carter denied the government planned similar moves against Christchurch City Council, whose functions have already been largely subsumed with the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority.
One group delighted with the reappointment of commissioners is Federated Farmers, which “applauds” the decision.
“Right now, the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan is proceeding at breakneck speed because of the time limit on the commissioners. I honestly don’t think anyone wishes them to act in haste so that we can repent at leisure,” Federated Farmers mid-Canterbury provincial president Chris Allen says.

























Comments and questions10
Now all they have to do is suspend general elections. Imagine how much faster nz legisation will go through without any troublesome opersition.
So by this logic National should suspend National elections until Maori water rights are "solved" as well?
They don't need to justify this to Cantabrians. ECan has been incompetent and useless for years - democracy did no good at all for the small-minded partisanship and incapabilities of ECan. The Commissioners are slowly provided us with some faith in the ability of ECan to do its job - let them continue until Canterbury can trust elected local officials again. Yes, Mayor and Council, that means you too.
incompetent and useless for years, may be, but our democratically elected incompetence and uselessness, should we suspend general elections because we have incompetence in government?
welcome to the Fijian state of Canterbury, democracy suspended for the benefit of the would be ruling class...
Isn't David Carter conflicted
Doesn't he own farms in North Canterbury and also around Darfield where the Govt run Ecan is supporting new irrigation schemes that will double or triple the value of his properties.
I would have thought the PM would have kept David Carter well away from Ecan and any decision they have or will make.
A wee bit smelly really
There seems to be a pattern of non democracy in Canterbury. ie EQC, CERA to name but 2. The people of Canterbury can be trusted to elect proper officials. if only we had politicians that are worthy of election. From what I have seen recently it seems that most our current batch could best be described as pygmy's. That it seems includes all parties. So I guess this was saves them a lot of bother. Though I doubt costs will be much different?
It seems to me that the challenge with our local authorities is to get competent people to stand for election. So often we seem to only get people who have not been properly tested and proven in the real world, particularly in the business arena.
I think the pattern of nondemocracy will increase NZ wide.
Democracy is an important part of our tradition.
Supposedly our men died recently to assist a country in that direction while our leaders p*ss ours against the wall.
Whose blood do they value?
Whose blood will they listen to?
my way
It's getting more and more difficult to distinguish between National and Labour as their policies merge
liberte