No Prime Minister's Office involvement in SIS OIA release
Vernon Small at Stuff reports:
The Security Intelligence Service says neither Prime Minister John Key nor his office played a part in the release of controversial documents to blogger Cameron Slater.
The documents were released to Slater six days after he requested them and posted on his Whaleoil website.
They confirmed the SIS had briefed then-Labour leader Phil Goff about Israeli backpackers who left the country after the Christchurch earthquakes.
In answer to questions from Fairfax Media today, referred from Key’s office to the SIS, a spokesman said the director was responsible for responses under the OIA “and made the decision to release, and what to release in this case”.
“Under the ‘no surprises’ convention the director or a representative would normally inform the minister’s office about what is being released under the OIA. That’s what occured in this case,” he said.
“Neither the PM nor his office expressed a view as to whether the information should be released, or to whom, or when,” the spokesman said.
So the story about Collins getting a prisoner moved is dead*, as is this story it seems.
The SIS Director is the former Cabinet Secretary, a role with the utmost integrity as they directly serve PMs and Cabinets of all political persuasions. If Rebecca Kitteridge says there was no involvement of the PMO in decision making, then that would have been the case.
Political commentator David Farrar posts at Kiwiblog.
* Some readers, and media, interpreted a section of Dirty Politics as meaning Cameron Slater asked Judith Collins to intervene on getting a prisoner moved to a different prison. Nicky Hager says he did not make that accusation and people have misinterpreted the chapter.
What do you think? Does Judith Collins have a place in government after the election? Click here to vote in our subscriber-only business pulse poll.