Member log in

Nothing left for Capital + Merchant investors

Capital + Merchant Finance investors have been told there are no assets left in the company to help recoup the $167 million they are owed.

Their only hope of recovering any capital lies in claims against directors and other parties involved with the company before it was dragged into receivership a year ago.

But receivers KordaMentha cannot assess if there are any claims to be made and how likely any claims are to succeed until they gain control of the company when first receiver Grant Thornton retires.

KordaMentha wrote to investors this month advising that Grant Thornton may retire before Christmas this year.

Their latest update shows that the only assets left in Capital + Merchant are insurance claims for losses on loans. The claims have not been accepted by insurers to date, KordaMentha understands.

Grant Thornton was appointed by priority creditors Fortress Credit Corp to recover their $22.6 million debt. But they say their actions have been in the best interests of all stakeholders, including debenture investors.

In May, KordaMentha said investors might be able to regain 10% of their investment.

Capital + Merchant had a $182.6 million value on its loan book when the company went into receivership, but receivers say they have struggled with recoveries in the current property and lending market and due to poor quality lending. 

Grant Thornton is also investigating a number of transactions made by the company which it is concerned about. When Capital + Merchant was placed in receivership, a judge commented that it appeared the company should have stopped taking public money some time earlier.

More by by Fiona Robertson

Signup to free NBR email alerts here

Comments and questions
1

Ahh, its just like the old days. has it really been 20 years since the train-wreck that was EquitiCorp, Goldcorp, Chasecorp etc? And here we are again.

Every few weeks I get an email from someone in Nigeria, offering me several million dollars if only I can help them by handing over my bank account details. I always file them the same place as any prospectuses I received from NZ finance companies... yes, the little round filing cabinet under my desk. Its difficult to determine which of these offerings had the least credibility.

Whereas 20 years ago those sandcastles of investor madness were build on the fallacy that shares will always go up in value, this time round the business models were based on the even more unsound belief that property will always go up in value. Yeah right.

I have to admit that I don't have a lot of sympathy for those losing money in these finance company collapses. They didn't offer specatular returns, the business models were shaky, and even having a respectable ex news reader in your ads can't hide a complete lack of aptitude for handling other peoples money.

So, cue another round of investor losses, another handful of unrepentent 'executives' (I'd use the word 'Cowboys', but that would be disrepectful to the genuine cattle men of western America) happy to go live off the fat from a total financial disaster, and no doubt another wave of collective amnesia leading to the whole sorry affair being repeated again in the future.

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>