Member log in

NZ to lead global research on methane gas emissions

New Zealand is leveraging its understanding of methane emissions from farm animals to lead global research on reducing the powerful, but short-lived, production of the gas.

Climate Change Minister Tim Groser says the project is one being taken on by the newly formed Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC), which New Zealand is joining.

Some 34 percent of total greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand are from methane, a shorter-lived but far more powerful gas than what Mr Groser called "the real climate change problem", carbon dioxide.

As a result of this unusually methane-rich emissions profile, scientific effort has concentrated on the area and was a key reason for New Zealand being a prime mover in establishing the Global Research Alliance on Agricultural GHGs, at the otherwise failed global talks in Copenhagen in 2009.

Mr Groser has returned from the global climate change talks, held this year in Doha, Qatar, where nations representing around 85 percent of global emissions, including New Zealand's tiny contribution, made sluggish progress on a post-Kyoto climate treaty to take effect in 2020 and be negotiated by 2015.

He has taken political flak from environmental advocates over the government's decision to take New Zealand drop out of the Kyoto Protocol just before the Doha talks began.

The meeting did agree to two streams of work: one focusing on the 2020 agreement and beyond, and a second on "raising ambitions" for emissions reductions before 2020.

Mr Groser says the new clean air coalition, which is a US initiative, "is focused on reducing methane emissions from industry which complements work that New Zealand is leading in reducing methane emissions from agriculture".

Unusual emissions figure

New Zealand's methane and nitrous oxide emissions from agriculture make up 48 percent of the country's total GHG emissions, making it unusual for a developed country.

Despite farmer opposition, agriculture was to have been included in the emissions trading scheme from 2015. The country's odd emissions profile has also driven research into reducing methane emissions from cows and sheep.

Before Doha, and with collapsing carbon prices globally, the government stripped all target dates for the ETS indefinitely, while the world sorts out a climate agreement to replace Kyoto, whose first commitment period ends in 18 days, on December 31.

Only European countries and Australia, representing about 15 percent of global emissions, have taken up a so-called second commitment, which will extend through to 2020.

"This new group is not a substitute for action on the real climate change problem, carbon dioxide, which remains in the atmosphere for around a hundred years," Mr Groser says in a statement.

"But moving quickly to reduce emissions from short-lived climate pollutants is part of a coherent strategy to tackle the challenge of climate change."

CCAC will focus on emissions mitigation research on a range of "potent but short-lived climate pollutants such as black carbon, and greenhouse gases including HFCs and methane".

The CCAC will meet next in March 2013.

(BusinessDesk)

Comments and questions
5

Mr Groser once again regurgitates some nonsense, thinking we are all fools and might believe he is Captain Planet saving us from doom. I plan to celebrate the man's foolishness with a can of baked beans eaten with gusto. Watch out world!

I hate to point out the obvious, but you have the perfect name to be reporting on this particular olfactory problem, Pattrick.

You do know he did change his name by deed poll, such is his passion for reporting on emissions.

New Zealand, centre for excellence in cattle flatulence.

Thanks, NIWA.

While the emissions profile for NZ states that 34% of our emissions are from methane, this is based on flawed logic.
Firstly, this measures the gross emissions from livestock. But a static number of animals have methane breahking down as fast as it is produced. There is no change in the atmospheric concentration and therefore there can be no global warming.
Secondly, the emissions profile is compiled by one set of calculations that have been chosen rather arbitrarily. They compare methane with carbon dioxide on a timescale of 100 years. Tim Flannery, an Australian climate scientist says carbon dioxide will last for 1000 years. Comparing methane on this basis lowers the effect of methane to only one third of its value. There are other ways of calculating methane that would also reduce our methane emissions to only a third of what they currently are.
Why is it that not a single journalist in this country appears to know this and enlightens their readers?