Member log in

NZ POLITICS DAILY: Another embarrassing blow to the Maori Party

The news of substantial cuts at Te Puni Kokiri is another embarrassing blow to the Maori Party.

With Waitangi celebrations only a few days away, Sharples may find himself alongside John Key having to answer some awkward questions on the marae.

The Maori Party can’t claim that National sprang this on them. As Winston Peters points out, this is a direct result of the need to fund their other policies, particularly Whanau Ora – listen to Peters interviewed on Radio New Zealand here. The Maori Party has left itself wide open to attack by Mana for doing National’s bidding by cutting public services  – see Morgan Godfery’s Te Puni Kokiri to face cuts and so far they have very little to show for the programmes they claim will replace TPK’s work.

Despite being Minister of Maori Affairs, Pita Sharples failed to go up against Hone Harawira on TVNZ’s Close Up last night, leaving the rather hapless TPK CEO Leith Comer to front the issue. Harawira says the cuts will result in branch closures, redundancies and the removal of most the department’s current responsibilities, dubbing the result ‘The puny kokiri’- see TVNZ’s Head of Maori agency defends job cuts.

The debate around Section 9 continues today, and its significance is becoming clearer. Mai Chen argues that ‘In many ways, the rise of the Treaty and of iwi in modern New Zealand can be traced back to section 9’ and how the issue is resolved could have big implications for the role of the Treaty in future, particularly the constitutional review the Government has committed to with the Maori Party – see: Section 9: Why it matters for asset sales. Today’s Herald editorial makes the case for retaining Section 9 (Treaty tie in hardly takes shine off gilt), while the Otago Daily Times editorial outlines the case against (Treaty entanglements).

A major part of the problem for the Maori Party has been a lack of political management, particularly by Pita Sharples. RNZ’s Brent Edwards says that Sharples not only failed to keep co-leader Tariana Turia in the loop about asset sales, but also missed the significance of the issue when briefed by Bill English last week – listen to Edwards here.

The Government has released the Maori consultation paper on asset sales, but Claire Trevett found the most revealing information came from a draft accidently posted to the Treasury website yesterday. It clearly shows that the Government was initially planning to remove all references to the Treaty.  Also revealing was the change of wording about consultation with ‘iwi leaders’ to just ‘iwi’, reflecting criticsm that Government consultation with Maori is limited to a few corporate iwi figures – see: Asset sale draft plan shocker.

Foreign investment, particularly in land, continues to be debated as sales that previously would have received little public scrutiny are examined in the wake of the Crafar deal. As Patrick Gower puts it (Cameron's NZ move under fire), film-maker James Cameron, who is buying two Wairarapa farms, ‘has walked right into a 'Hollywood-meets-politics' storm’. Having made a stand on the Crafar farms, Labour now can’t afford to ignore other deals. David Parker is drawing the line at absentee owners of land – see: Alex Tarrant’s Labour OK with foreign land purchases as long as new owner lives in NZ…, but opponents argue that there is plenty of ambiguity in such a stance. David Farrar, for example, is pointing out that Labour’s official policy on foreign investment would prohibit the James Cameron purchase – see: Is Labour against this foreign purchase? Clearly, with National having taken a lot of heat over the Crafar deal, their supporters are not going to let Labour get away with selective political grandstanding.

Anne Tolley was a casualty of National’s ongoing feud with teachers, and it now looks like Hekia Parata’s tenure as Education Minister could be just as torrid. Prospective Act leader Catherine Isaac is overseeing the Charter Schools trial, and opposition parties, unions and academics cite this as evidence that the policy is completely ideologically driven – see Andrea Vance’s  Anger at ACT link in charter schools trial. Meanwhile, John Armstrong argues that, given National and Act’s determination to implement the policy, Isaac is actually the right person for the job. He says her appointment is part of a trend for National to farm out new initiatives to task forces and working groups to strengthen private sector input and go around government departments – see: Armstrong’s Isaac best candidate for education task force.

Further incensing teacher unions and academics is the plan to compile official league tables for primary school performance. Parata claims that having the Ministry compile the league table will ensure accurate comparisons are done, but critics claim that as primary school data is un-moderated (unlike NCEA) that data will be ‘junk’ and open to manipulation – see Audrey Young’s Fight looms as Parata touts move on school ratings. But there is one league table the education sector wish the government would take more notice of, and that’s the one that shows New Zealand already gets exceptional performance for relatively low teacher salaries when compared to the rest of the OECD – see: The Dim-Post.

Finally Sam Sachdeva provides a comprehensive account of yesterday’s protest in Christchurch, including a sense of the atmosphere amongst the protestors – see: Protesters threaten rates revolt in Christchurch, while a more subjective account is given by Will Harvie in Protesting with Christchurch's elders.

 

Bryce Edwards

 
 
Today’s content
 
All items are contained in the attached PDF. Below are the links to the items online
 
TPK job cuts
Morgan Godfery (Maui Street): Te Puni Kokiri to face cuts
Robert Winter (Idle Thoughts): Maori Party: toothless
 
Asset sales and section 9
Claire Trevett (Herald): Asset sale draft plan shocker
Grant Robertson (Red Alert): Section 9 debacle: The real story
Vernon Small and Kate Chapman (Stuff): Key to take asset fight to Waitangi
ODT: Editorial - Treaty entanglements
No Right Turn: Compare and contrast
 
Foreign investment
Timaru Herald: Editorial - Why all the objections?
Taranaki Daily News: Editorial: Striking balance vital for industry
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Is Labour against this foreign purchase?
Patrick Gower (TV3): Cameron's NZ move under fire
 
Christchurch
Sam Sachdeva (Press): Call to fire CEO, hold elections
Martin van Beynen (Press): Anarchy kicks off protest – but good
Press: Editorial  – Public take action
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): 
 
Charter schools and education reform
Hayden Donnell (Herald): Isaac hits back at appointment criticism
Scott Yorke (Imperator Fish): Call Me, John
John Hartevelt (Stuff): Primary results may go online
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): A schools database
 
Other
Vernon Small (Stuff): Treasury calls for radical reforms
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): National v Labour from the beginning
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Shock horror – no law broken
Terence O’brien (Dom Post): Bad time to make cuts to the foreign affairs budget
Audio coverage of politics

 

 

 

 

 

More by Bryce Edwards

Signup to free NBR email alerts here

Comments and questions
7

I believe Cameron is also making a movie here which brings in money, allows jobs to continue etc. What does Labour not understand about investment & return. Oh thats right, nothing! Shearer won't as he worked for the UN spending money, not raising it. And before that he was a teacher.

We are not interested in government departments that employ people but departments that lead to REAL results, getting people off the drip feed of nany state and leaning heavily on the wheel of industry & commerce.

Maybe socialists in NZ should remember this statement by a US liberal

Don’t ask what your country can do for you. Ask instead what you can do for your country

In response to Anonymous | Friday, February 3, 2012 - 7:55am

Mate I heard the same BS back in 1984 to justify asset sales and overseas investment.
2012 and we are in a severe recession and getting worse by the day. After all these years we hardly have any assets left. You can't tell that to the teflon coated pre madonna we have as a prime minister.

Pre madonna? Key is actually three years younger than Madonna. Furthermore, you really should measure it by their time as public figures. So I'd say Key is again actually POST Madonna since she's been around since the 80s. Key only 2000s.

How's your electric bill by the way? Mine sucks and got 70% worse under Labour. Can't even afford play my Madonna records anymore. Bring on the partial sales.

In response to Pre-Madonna - 8:55 | Friday, February 3, 2012 - 8:32am

Get real, if you think you are getting ripped off now with power pricing wait till all these power assets are sold. As an example look at contact energy's pricing and how many customers they have lost over the last five years.

Good point - they've lost customers. And they will need to do better. If all government owned, you've got no choice. You pay what they set. As demonstrated by 70% increases during Labour's tenure. Put Cunliffe's talking points down. They don't hold water and require you to ignore facts, basic economics and history.

Te Puni Kokiri cots mean nothing. I believe it was a Maori leader ‘Kingi’ who said TPK is only now a government advisory on policy. Remember TPK was set up prior to the Maori Party Mana Party etc. Much of what is needed for Maori should come from there. TPK has just become another bloated money sucking government department.

As to selling land: If I owned a farm and some person from XYZ country was offering me $10M to buy and the guy next door was offering $8m to buy, I would sell to the guy next door, pass a Tui please. Really is the only difference in buying a farm, office block, or house is the size of the land involved. Foreigners can buy a hotel, an office block and a house, why not a farm?

In response to Pre-Madonna - 8:55 | Friday, February 3, 2012 - 8:32am

"How's your electric bill by the way? Mine sucks and got 70% worse under Labour. Can't even afford play my Madonna records anymore. Bring on the partial sales."

And what do you think partial asset salwes will do? Reduce your power bill? How effing naive can you get? Dp you really think investors are going to sacrifice dividends so your power bill will drop?

God spare me from naive people like you who probably still believe in "trickle down" theory...

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>