NZ POLITICS DAILY: The tricky business of mixing money and politics
It seems that many of our politicians are rather ‘tricky’ when it comes to mixing business, money and politics. The last week has been full of allegations about politicians and their conflicts of interest and dodgy fundraising mechanisms. For most voters the finer details will be irrelevant and boring, but this doesn’t mean that it’s a ‘beltway’ topic of little consequence. Instead, the battles over hypocrisy and untrustworthiness are becoming a defining feature of New Zealand politics. In an escalating battle over personal behaviour, business interests and donations, all parties seem to think that they can score easy points against their opponents, but the reality is everyone involved ends up looking hypocritical and ‘tricky’.
National’s ‘tricky’ restaurant fundraisers
The latest allegation about secret political donations has been leveled at Prime Minister John Key, as a result of his interview with Patrick Gower on TV3’s The Nation at the weekend. The gist of the allegation is that National used ‘tricky’ fundraising mechanisms that are at odds with Key’s insistence on clarity around the identity of political donors and particularly his assertion that Cunliffe needs to name the donors to his trust. You can see Patrick Gower’s 3-minute news report and article Key 'tricky' with donation dinner details. Most attention is directed at the use of a restaurant fundraising mechanism that funnels smaller donations into one large donation. As with the Cunliffe trust, it’s not necessarily unlawfulness being alleged, but rather questions over principles and hypocrisy. Gower says the episode ‘shows that with donations Mr Key and National can be "tricky" too’.
So is John Key being ‘tricky’? No, according to electoral law expert Andrew Geddis – see his blog post One of these things actually isn't quite like the other, which is the best defence of National’s fundraising methods. Geddis colourfully argues that there is a temptation to see the Cunliffe and Key fundraising schemes as having ‘equivalence’ but that ‘it's a superficial and misleading similarity. Because the important difference is the intent in each case. Cunliffe's use of a trust was deliberately meant to enable individual gifts that otherwise would have to be declared to Parliament's registrar of pecuniary interests (which has a $500 threshold) to remain "faceless", in that it permitted only the Trust's gift to Cunliffe to be declared. It's the exact same strategem that the National Party used for years with its Waitemata Trust donation laundering vehicle - a practice that Labour criticised heavily at the time and enacted the Electoral Finance Act to stop (amongst other things). Which is why Cunliffe's decision to adopt the same strategy was so very, very silly. In comparison, none of the individual donations made at the Dinner at Antoine's (in the form of a $5000 payment to attend) had to be declared to the Electoral Commission, as the threshold for declaring party donations was at that time $10,000 (its since gone up to $15,000). So there was no necessary reason for the donations to be bundled together and passed over in one lump sum. It just seemed to happen that way because the owner of Antoine's got the attendees to first pay him for the dinner, then gave a single cheque to National a few days later, rather than the attendees writing out cheques to National directly. If they had done the latter - which would have been entirely legal - then we would not have had any record of the dinner taking place at all’.
Similarly, on the NBR website Matthew Hooton argues that ‘the two situations are not comparable’ – see: Key under fire for Antoine’s donations. Hooton is quoted as saying that ‘The Antoine’s thing is more a case of an eccentric restaurateur taking it upon himself to raise funds for National, than anything to do with Mr Key or the party…. He rings round his friends, arranges a dinner, charges usurious amounts, invites Mr Key and then passes on some of the profits to the party’.
For further information on the legality of the two fundraising mechanisms, see David Farrar’s Donation disclosure thresholds in which he explains ‘the three different sorts of donations and the thresholds’.
Possibly a better case is made by Danyl Mclauchlan in his post That is not it at all. For him – like Gower – it's not so much the legality in question, but whether there’s an inconsistency on National and Key’s part. Mclauchlan says, yes, the Cunliffe and Key examples might be different but that ‘doesn’t get around the problem that they’ve been railing against anonymous political donations all week when they’ve spent the past few years raking in huge sums of money in anonymous political donations’.
Lawyer Graeme Edgeler (@GraemeEdgeler) has also made some similar points on Twitter, and got himself into a spirited debate with Steve Joyce (@stevenljoyce). Edgeler said there was an ‘issue of hypocrisy, where National is asking Cunliffe to release more information that he is required to, but… is not then prepared to release more information than they are required to, when asked similarly’. For more Twitter debate, see my blog post Top tweets about National’s anonymous restaurant dinner donations.
This morning TV3’s Firstline also had a 7-minute discussion with Russell Brown and David Slack on the topic of Politics: A matter of trusts.
Cunliffe’s trusts and business friends
How David Cunliffe could have managed to score such a spectacular own goal with his use of secret trusts continues to be a subject of analysis For the most interesting and amusing speculation about what’s going on behind the scenes, see Rodney Hide’s fictional account by Matt McCarten: A secret memo on secret trusts.
Tracy Watkins seeks to understand how such a politician as smart as Cunliffe could fail ‘to realise the lack of transparency around donations to his leadership campaign and declaration of financial interests was a grenade waiting to go off’, and in explanation she points to the fact that ‘Cunliffe’s biggest critics have always complained about a lack of self awareness as his potentially fatal flaw’ – see: The enigma of Cunliffe. Similarly, see Toby Manhire’s Labour woes lay bare 'bed blocking' crisis.
Fran O'Sullivan also has questions for Cunliffe: ‘But he is yet to explain why this pair of donors didn't want to proudly proclaim their support for Cunliffe. Have these two other donors got something to hide? By insisting their identities remain secret they have inevitably fuelled speculation that they have something to gain from Cunliffe's ascension to the Labour leadership and may have been trying to buy influence. This is either true or it is not’ – see: Donor slip exposes Cunliffe hypocrisy.
Cunliffe is under further scrutiny for his role in helping one of his business donor friends purchase a residential property – see Jonathan Milne’s Politician aided with purchase of $4m paradise. Once again, a major part of the story is not so much the original substance of what happened, but the allegation that Cunliffe attempted to cover it up. For blogosphere reaction, see David Farrar’s anti-Cunliffe take on it: More tricky and The Standard’s pro-Cunliffe defence: Overreach.
Judith Collins and business relationships
Although Judith Collins might be hoping that Gower’s allegations about John Key’s restaurant fundraisers will take the focus off her, there continue to be vocal condemnations of her handling of the controversy over her dealings with the Oravida milk company. The strongest is the Dominion Post editorial which says it appears that Collins has breached the Cabinet Manual rules and there needs to be ‘a careful inquiry to see what statements appeared and what changes were made, and when’ – see: Collins must be above board. The editorial also points out that even after Oravida corrected its website on Collins’ request, ‘the website still contained photos of Ms Collins visiting the company and included an English text in which she praised its achievements’.
The Prime Ministers’ backing of Collins over the saga might not be as strong as first appeared according to Tracy Watkins’ Endorsements and undisclosed donations. She says ‘Key has instead been careful to frame his defence of Collins around the Cabinet office advice - and at the weekend put himself even further at arms length by suggesting that if there was a conflict of interest, it was up to Collins to manage it. That suggests Key is taking the time-honoured approach of waiting to see if anything further will come out before offering more fulsome backing of his minister’.
Certainly the Labour Opposition is still gunning for Collins, with Grant Robertson using new documents released by her office to make the point that the visit was "a well-organised publicity stunt and photo op, yet Judith Collins has spent the week trying to minimise and diminish it as a casual glass of milk"’ – see Claire Trevett’s 'Cuppa' claim over visit wrong: MP.
And No Right Turn reminds the PM of his 2008 claim that National would be more ethical in governance than Labour had been, and how poorly this claim compares with his recent pronouncements – see: "A higher standard of government".
Mixing money and politics
Some argue that the debate about politics and money is a distraction from ‘real politics’, as if there is no connection between funding political parties and public policy. This is the point made today in The Standard’s Beltway blues: serving the public interest? That blog post argues that looking into politician’s connections to money is superficial and sensationalist.
But the central issues are actually quite profound and important. And the debate over the influence of wealth in politics will continue to be a major feature of New Zealand politics. For example, today the No Right Turn blog looks at National’s Antoine’s restaurant saga and draws attention to the sequence of events that led to Antoine’s restaurant owner Tony Astle suddenly receiving an ONZM New Years Honour. No lines are drawn between the dots, leaving the reader to decide whether the business donations/fundraising and the Government award is linked – see: “Out of the blue”.
And although in his blog post One of these things actually isn't quite like the other, Andrew Geddis defends National’s restaurant fundraising from some of the accusations being made, he also raises some highly critical questions about whether such fundraisers are selling access to politicians.
The whole issue of potential quid-pro-quo deals resulting from the private funding of politics raises questions about how to regulate money in politics and how politicians can ensure that they are not ethically compromised. Ex-Labour Party bagman Mike Williams writes about his own experience with Labour and New Zealand First raising money and reveals the ways he attempted to keep money and politics separate, but also his strong belief that Winston Peters was not guilty of the 2008 allegations about donations from Owen Glenn – see: How to keep donations secret.
Fran O'Sullivan disputes the notion that money and politics are kept separate by trusts: ’Does anyone seriously believe this convoluted charade stops the politicians from making educated guesses over who is backing them? Or that Auckland Mayor Len Brown hasn't a clue over which business people contributed to his campaign fund trust? I don't think so’ – see: Donor slip exposes Cunliffe hypocrisy.
The reality is that anonymous donations are notoriously difficult to regulate. The simplest solution is to either ban them outright or allow them in total. But New Zealand (and many other countries) attempts to allow a half-way house solution whereby some anonymous donations are allowed – i.e. those below a certain threshold – and others are banned. This discrepancy in the rules, together with other flaws in the regulations, will always allow anonymous donations of varying sizes to go undetected. In fact, according to David Farrar, the Cunliffe donations controversy is going to help John Banks fight against the charges in his upcoming court trial – see: Will Banks use the Cunliffe defence in court.
National’s use of Antoine’s restaurant to raise campaign finance is not entirely unique. All parties use a variety of fundraising events, albeit with very different amounts of money involved. There’s also the possibility that such fundraising in New Zealand can be legally classed as a ‘business activity’ therefore bypassing the Electoral Act and avoiding disclosure. My own blog post, Using restaurant dinners and other business activity to get around donation disclosure, explains this further.
Related to this, Frank Macskasy raises some interesting questions on the Daily Blog – see: National’s fund-raising at Antoine’s – was GST paid? Although it might appear a trivial question involving trivial amounts of money, Macskasy’s question about GST goes to the heart of whether such activities are ‘business transactions’ or donations. He quotes the IRD’s definition of a donation: ‘A donation is an unconditional gift only if the giver receives nothing in return’, and suggests the Antoine’s dinners do not qualify.
In the end, all politicians lose out from this focus on where they get their money from, and how they spend it. This is why, until recently, politicians avoided such fights breaking out. Interestingly, therefore, Rob Salmond, who blogs for Labour’s Leader’s Office, says today ‘I hope we can all pull out of this bipartisan dive into the political gutter, because I for one would much rather we spend the year talking about policy ideas that actually matter to New Zealanders' lives’ – see: Donations, donations, donations. But he also says: ‘Both Labour and National evidently think they have braces of ammunition for a war of words over whose fundraising is dodgier than whose. My advice to National, a party seen by the public as being too close to big business and as having feathered their own mates’ nests too much, is look very, very carefully before you leap in there’.
Finally, with the word ‘tricky’ quickly becoming a theme of the 2014 election campaign, inevitably the RUN DMC song of the same name is being called into play by commentators and satirists. DJ McQuillan (@mcquillanatorz) (aka Newstalk ZB parliamentary gallery reporter Laura McQuillan) has remixed a 30-second rap titled 'Tricky David Cunliffe'. Of course this satirical snippet can be seen as laughing at either Cunliffe or Key, depending on how you listen to it. And this is, after all, a nice metaphor for the whole ‘tricky’ business.
Money, business, and politics
Tracy Watkins (Stuff): Endorsements and undisclosed donations
Rodney Hide (Herald): A secret memo on secret trusts
Jonathan Milne (Herald): Politician aided with purchase of $4m paradise
Fran O'Sullivan (Herald): Donor slip exposes Cunliffe hypocrisy
Tracy Watkins (Stuff): The enigma of Cunliffe
Newswire: Key not talking about fundraising dinner
Patrick Gower (TV3): Key 'tricky' with donation dinner details
Mike Hosking (Newstalk ZB): 'Tricky' Cunliffe needs to break the reputation
Mike Williams (Herald): How to keep donations secret
Toby Manhire (Herald): Labour woes lay bare 'bed blocking' crisis
NBR Staff (NBR): Key under fire for Antoine’s donations
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Cunliffe blaming others for his own problems
Danyl McLauchlan (Dim-Post): That is not it at all
Martyn Bradbury (Daily Blog): The Patrick Gower Hour of Power – The Nation review
The Standard: Give us the names or pay the money back, John
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Pundits on Cunliffe
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Will Banks use the Cunliffe defence in court
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Imperator Fish on media bias
Pete George (Your NZ): Gower asks tricky donations questions
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Donation disclosure thresholds
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): More tricky
The Standard: Dinner money
Martyn Bradbury (Daily Blog): Pay back the 21 donors Mr Key
The Standard: Filibustering
Pete George (Your NZ): The Nation improved
No Right Turn: "Out of the blue"
Third Culture: Wealth and Citizenship
Frank Macskasy (Daily Blog): National’s fund-raising at Antoine’s – was GST paid?
The Standard: Overreach
Andrew Geddis (Pundit): One of these things actually isn't quite like the other
John Armstrong (Herald): Cunliffe had better fix image fast
Rob Salmond (Polity): Armstrong on Labour
Rob Salmond (Polity): Donations, donations, donations
Latest polls and the election
Newswire: Key expects to reveal election date soon
Felix Marwick (Newstalk ZB): Labour and National up in new opinion poll
Pete George (Your NZ): Roy Morgan poll – Green and Labour worries continue
Brennan McDonald: The Election
David Farrar (Kiwiblog):Latest poll
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Guest Post: The First Election Debate
Paul Little (Herald): Election - game of Trivial Pursuit
Colin Craig and Russel Norman
Stephanie Flores (NBR): Media lawyer says court unlikely to fast-track defamation suit brought by Colin Craig
NBR Staff (NBR): Colin Craig's spoof campaign raises $50K in a day
Radio NZ: $50,000 donated to 'spoof' appeal
Isaac Davison (Herald): Craig's fund for Norman defamation case takes off
Hamish Rutherford (Stuff): Colin Craig legal fundraiser 'spoof'
Felix Marwick (Newstalk ZB): Legal tussle between Craig and Norman steps up a gear
Newswire: Craig's 'spoof' raises real money
Patrice Dougan (Herald): Craig's defamation claim is to 'raise standard of debate'
Newswire: Colin Craig undecided on electorate
Felix Marwick (Newstalk ZB): Conservative Party will have to declare donations
Greg Presland (The Standard): Colin Craig wants help with his legal costs …
Pete George (Your NZ): Craig copies Green plea for donations
Grant Duncan (Policy Matters): Colin raises the standards?
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Defamation as a fundraiser
Tahu Potiki (Stuff): Shocked city still so battered and broken
Andrea Vance (Stuff): Vance: Floods? PM can't keep a straight face
Radio NZ: Labour proposes buyout for flood houses
Duncan Garner (RadioLIVE): Pull the desperate and homeless out of the Christchurch black hole
Georgina Stylianou (Stuff): Cunliffe 'heartbroken' for Christchurch
Liz McDonald (Stuff): Rich pickings for Christchurch's wealthy
Steven Cowan (Against he Current): Wanted: A Democratic Rebuild of Christchurch
Claire Trevett (Herald): TVNZ can't ask staff to declare politics
Vernon Small (Stuff): State servant political register 'not appropriate'
Felix Marwick (Newstalk ZB): TVNZ told to butt out of staff's personal rights
John Drinnan (Herald): TVNZ can't push staff on political views
Brian Edwards (BEM): TVNZ Introduces ‘Political Arousal Test’ for Journos
Matthew Hooton (NBR): Still time for Shane Jones to save Labour
Shelley Robinson (Stuff): Tony Milne to run for Chch Central
Jade Cooper (Newstalk ZB): Christchurch Labour candidate wants to focus on housing
Newswire: Labour selects Chch Central candidate
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Labour selects Tony Milne for Christchurch Central
Susan St. John (Daily Blog): A very weak week – doing Jacinda Ardern’s job for her
Ele Ludemann (Homepaddock): He would say that
NBR Staff (NBR): Cunliffe defends leadership
Pete George (Your NZ): Q+A: Parata and Cunliffe comparison
Frank Macskasy (Daily Blog): A proposed Labour-Green-Mana(-NZ First?) agenda – part toru
Claire Trevett (Herald): Too many international students, says Shane Jones
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Jones against international students
Matthew Beveridge: Compare and contrast: Ian McKelvie vs Deborah Russell
Tracy Watkins (Stuff): Race for candidates moves up a gear
Dominion Post: Editorial: Collins must be above board
Newswire: Doctor to contest Whangarei seat
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Reti wins Whangarei
Ele Ludemann (Homepaddock): Belief born out of experience
No Right Turn: "A higher standard of government"
Fine Tooth Column: Ain’t no party like a National Party cause a National Party don’t stop
Pete George (Your NZ): Has Bryce Edwards manufactured news?
Martyn Bradbury (Daily Blog): Why Key’s cult of no personality works in NZ and how the left beat it
David Kennedy (Local Bodies): LB: Government Spin and Hidden Secrets
Newswire: National selects Napier candidate
Claire Trevett (Herald): 'Cuppa' claim over visit wrong: MP
Adam Benentt (Herald): National picks business boss for Napier race
NBR Staff (NBR): $2.7 million to lift achievement of at-risk students – Parata
Teuila Fuatai (Herald): Education Minister denies 'massaging' of NCEA results
Simon Wong (TV3): Student loan change will 'create fear'
David Kennedy (Local Bodies): Educational Ideology and Collateral Damage
Dylan Reeve: Religion in Schools (Again)
Dianne Kahn (Daily Blog): The Problem With Performance Pay for Teachers
Holly Walker (Frogblog): ‘Cracking-down’ on graduates
Matthew Dallas (Manawatu Standard): Editorial: Returning truants just the beginning
Dominion Post: Editorial: Dodging tricky issue a tragic error
Michael Foreman (Stuff): Glass ceiling alive and well: report
Ross Henderson (Stuff): Women's human touch needed
Iain Scott (Stuff): Work equality eludes women say advocates
Andrew Geddes (Pundit): Why do right wing parties not want women?
Ele Ludemann (Homepaddock): Celebrating all but one
Stephanie Rodgers (The Standard): Happy International (Working) Women’s Day!
NBR Staff (NBR): Greens' MP pay policy on the money - Taxpayers' Union
Tracy Watkins (Stuff): Greens push for smaller pay rises for MPs
Adam Bennett (Herald): Greens would link MPs to median wage
John Armstrong (Herald): Putin 1, Western powers 0, in battle over Ukraine
Tom Peters (WSW): New Zealand parliament unanimously backs US in Ukraine crisis
Don Franks (Redline): New Zealand parliament crawls up Nuland’s arse
Timaru Herald: Editorial: More detail, really?
Martyn Bradbury (Daily Blog): The questions you will ask, in about the order you will ask them, next month when you open your power bill
Matthew Beveridge: David Cunliffe and Kiwipower
Pete George (Your NZ): Cunliffe’s power graph gaffe
Radio NZ: Asbestos costs KiwiRail millions - union
Politician name supression
Bevan Hurley (Herald): Politician gets to keep details of divorce secret
Newswire: Interest rates set to rise
Laura Walters (Stuff): Fonterra milk powder destroyed
Helen Harvey (Stuff): Taranaki has led the nation's recovery, says minister
Ben Clark (The Standard): Pinning hopes on China
Denise Roche (Frogblog): Did SkyCity make $1.4 million out of alleged money laundering?
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): B is for banking (central)
Bernard Orsman (Herald): Thousands more city sites need Maori tick
Brian Rudman (Herald): Verifying iwi sites best place to start
Radio NZ: Online voting: mixed benefits for Maori
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Maori MPs and candidates
Inequality and poverty
John Weekes (Herald): If beneficiaries get a job, they also get hoots and standing ovation from Winz
Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett (Guardian): The Spirit Level authors: why society is more unequal than ever
Ben Fahy (Idealog): One Percent Collective’s philanthropic gospel deters dreams of superherodom
Ele Ludemann (Homeapddock): Another angle on inequality
Michael Parkin (TVNZ): Internet Party's app will force others to follow suit
Tracy Watkins (Stuff): Labour promises digital 'bill of rights'
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Lobby group supports Labours Internet tax
Newswire: Flavell to hear concerns of Kiwis in Aus
Peter Fowler (Radio NZ): Water quality ranks high for voters
Adrien Taylor (TV3): Greens call for transparency in Govt-oil company deals
Matthew Beveridge: Tips for MPs/Candidates using Twitter
Tim Selwyn (Tumeke): Stephenson hash
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): The New Zealand Head of State campaign
Colin Espinder (Stuff): Espiner: Get tough on dog owners
Tim Hunter (Stuff): Directors need looking at
Rob Stock (Stuff): ACC axe falls more on men
Radio NZ: Local govt head Yule 'embarrassed'
Janine Rankin (Stuff): Ruling revives fluoride debate
Southland Times: Editorial: Here, piggy piggy, piggy
Stacey Knott (Stuff): MP joins fight for family to stay here
Gordon Brown (Stuff): House of Cards is back
Andrew Geddis (Pundit): Don't walk away, in silence
Martin van Beynen (Stuff): Money makes us happy, so we exist
Michele Hewitson (Herald): Interview: Paul Henry
Paul Thomas (Herald): Over heated and over here
Amy Jackman (Stuff): Pistols at dawn and a mighty fire
Pattrick Smellie (Idealog): There’s going to be a revolution?
Steve Braunias (Metro): Brauniasland: life after rabbit ears
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Offences out of kilter
Eric Crampton (Offsetting Behaviour): Brownean motion
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): A Labour MP supports asset sales
John Drinnan (Herald): Pirate doco kept waiting
Tony Holman (Herald): CCOs a Trojan horse for privatization
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Williams on Peters
Matthew Dentith (Episto): Conspiracy Corner – The Taxpayers’ Union and Jordan Williams