Member log in

NZ POLITICS DAILY: Wharfies' big donation to Labour

‘How big is my politics’ asks The Political Scientist blog in an insightful post focusing on David Shearer’s comments about the Christchurch recovery and rebuild.

Shearer’s approach to issues to date appears to be based on ‘bi-partisan’ solutions. De-politicisation is generally seen as good if it reduces petty points scoring, but this blog says Shearer takes it too far, mistakenly believing ‘that all that is needed to solve most controversial and significant issues is a good sit down, chin-wag and get together - see: Shearer on ‘How big is my politics?’

The debate over Labour’s Red Alert blog continues, and today Scott Yorke has a very funny post that pokes fun at Clare Curran and Trevor Mallards’ obsession with David Farrar – see: Red Alert: The Best Is Yet To David Farrar. Meanwhile, David Farrar refutes claims by Clare Curran that he has attacked and undermined Red Alert, pointing out that Labour activists and supporters have been the most vocal critics recently – see Farrar’s post: Red Alert

Claire Trevett in the Herald looks at large donations to political parties for the election campaign – particularly union donations to the Labour Party, including $18,500 from the Maritime Union which represents workers at the Ports of Auckland. While Labour received over $120,000 from unions, National received over $490,000, mostly from corporates. Full details of all political donations won’t be available until May - see: Wharf-row union among big donors to Labour.

The Maritime Union looks set to play one of its trump cards in the Ports of Auckland dispute, with TVNZ reporting a meeting with the International Transport Workers Federation to organise international support if the Ports of Auckland follow through with their contracting-out proposal – see: International concern grows over Ports of Auckland dispute.

 While employment law prevents other workers taking action within New Zealand to support the union, most of the 400,000 ITF members in more than 200 major ports around the world don’t have the same restrictions. Saving a few dollars per container as it’s loaded in Auckland might not seem like such a bargain if it remains stuck on a ship in some foreign port. Asked by Mike Hosking if the ITF can actually have any influence, ITF President Paddy Crumlin’s response was ‘we’ll test our arm, put it that way’ – listen here.

Brian Edwards wholeheartedly supports a ‘nanny ban’ on smoking in public spaces in Auckland, and Amelia Wade reports that he is not alone. An Otago University study has directly linked smoking and binge drinking, showing that smokers are almost three times more likely be hazardous drinkers. Associate Professor Nick Wilson also accuses the Government of merely tinkering with alcohol laws saying that taxpayers are landed with the costs while alcohol and tobacco industries take the profits – see: Dave Williams’ Hit booze in smoking battle: experts and Govt 'pathetically weak' on booze: expert

The government may also face criticism that it is pandering to SkyCity casino as it negotiates concessions in return for the company building a $350 million convention centre in Auckland. John Hartevelt reports that SkyCity has asked for a thousand extra pokie machines and relaxation of rules around promotion of gambling, which has the Problem Gambling Foundation concerned – see: Minister, casino play cards close to chest on pokies and convention centre

Bryce Edwards, NZPD Editor (bryce.edwards@nzpoliticsdaily.co.nz

 
Today’s content:
 

Labour Party
Chris Trotter (Dom Post): Pagani strategy has whiff of poor losers
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Red Alert
Scott Yorke (Imperator Fish): Red Alert: The Best Is Yet To David Farrar
Darien Fenton (Red Alert): Bon voyage to more whanau in 2012
The Political Scientist: Shearer on ‘How big is my politics?
Morgan Godfery (Maui Street): Shane Jones on asset sales and mining

 
Political funding
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Union donations
 
Ports of Auckland dispute
David Farrar (Kiwiblog): Is it really about casualisation?
 
Cigarettes and alcohol
Amelia Wade (Herald): Backing for public smoking ban
 
Environment and energy
 
Child poverty documentary
Cameron Slater (Whaleoil): NZ on Air criticism sounds familiar
 
Other
Clio Frances (Stuff): Struggling homeowners catch a break
Eric Crampton (Offsetting Behaviour): Food Bill
Trevor Mallard (Red Alert): What are the Crafar farms worth?

 

 

 

 

 

 

More by Bryce Edwards

Signup to free NBR email alerts here

Comments and questions
3

I wonder if the FBI and OFCANZ should investigate the Labour Party and MUNZ and ITF President Paddy Crumlin for attempting to incite international piracy whilst holding a business to ransom?

Surely holding a city and it’s business’s to ransom whilst inciting other Nations to copy this kind of belligerent behaviour would amount to treason against the State?

Then could OFCANZ also investigate the Labour Party for the 2008 election rort where they attempted to rig the election by stealing nearly $1million dollars of tax payer funds in the overspend on the political electioneering cap – then Labour, as the sitting government, retrospectively altered the law so as to avoid prosecuting itself.

Surely there’s at least a theft as a servant charge in there – if not treason? Have Labour paid this money back yet? Are prosecutions pending?

Labour were acting like al-Asaad of Syria only stopping short of killing people, but they turned their spiteful vengeance on business’s setting their lap dog, bully boy union mates on big, juicy, tax-payer funded targets – like PoAL.

Maybe this government could follow Labour’s lead and retrospectively change the law so PoAL (and all other NZ business’s) can run their business as needed, making it illegal for organised extortion whilst holding a commercial entity to ransom?

Despite TV3's misleading headline about "International concern" and talk of union "trump cards" I wouldn't be too worried.

Paddy Crumlin and the ITF sound like a throwback to the days when union dinosaurs ruled the earth and I am sure when it comes to the crunch his "members" won't sacrifice their own incomes to help a handful of comrades in a place few of them would have heard of.

In response to Jurassic port | Friday, January 20, 2012 - 3:45pm

You're probably right - the thing that sticks in my craw, is how is it possible that legalised, parasitic extortion and willful sabotage is still possible here in Gods own in 2012?

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>