NZ ready for compulsory savings - NZX chairman
NZX chairman Andrew Harmos believes New Zealanders are "ready for some compulsion" in their savings.
The absence of such compulsion was a little difficult to understand, he told the NZX annual meeting in Wellington today.
"I don't need to tell this audience that this is one of the big reasons why there is a wealth and income gap -- and frankly a financial literacy and investment sophistication gap -- between us and Australia," Mr Harmos said.
"In my judgment New Zealanders are ready for some compulsion here, albeit at a more modest level than the Australian (compulsory superannuation) 9 percent and rising. A modest starting level with a steady path of well-signalled increases would be a strong start."
Savings were now insufficient for New Zealanders to control strategic businesses and assets. Owners of those businesses could move head offices, decision making, control and intellectual property, and over time generally did, Mr Harmos said.
He also added his comments to the theme of public minority ownership being allowed into some state owned enterprise.
Before the meeting started, Solid Energy chairman John Palmer told the audience that SOE Solid Energy would benefit from a similar type of ownership to that of Air New Zealand, of which he is also chairman.
Air New Zealand was 75 percent owned by crown, but was also listed and operated by listed company disciplines, Mr Palmer said.
"What I would like to think is that we have proved that a model of a listed company with a majority crown ownership can work."
Mr Harmos said he did not know of anyone who wanted SOEs sold into foreign control and ownership and to frame the debate in those terms was mischievous.
"New Zealand is an outlier in the extent to which Government owns 100 percent of so many key trading enterprises: these are good stable businesses, some of which could be exposed to public minority ownership and the governance and transparency that comes with it," Mr Harmos said.
"It is hard to criticise the Air NZ or Vector models -- and those co-investment models are the ones that fit well into an integrated national savings, capital markets and economic strategy."
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit













Comments and questions10
Not content to let the State alone in bullying us around, now a supposed business leader adocating compulsion.
For Rand's sake I just utterly despair at the dearth of philosophy.
Why am I not surprised this weasels out from NZX. The Prime NZX Useful Idiot advocating pre-budget that the Government should attack property investors by attacking LAQC's, showing he had no idea of the difference between a business sector and a business structure. Now Useful Idiot Two puts his head up above the parapet of the same organisation. Appalling.
Harmos, do you feel your NZX is so hopeless that the only way to drum up business is to advocate for compulsion at the brute hands of State? Why not advocate for the single-most thing that can get quality companies to the NZX: a free b-loody market. And with that our freedom (for people like me from people like you).
None of these mental giants learned anything out of WWII (indeed, since 1776).
All typos above due to being so furious.
I'm not ready for compulsory savings. Really, compulsory saving is sort of an oxymoron, any type of compulsory payment is a tax.
Guys get real. This isn't an Ayn Rand text this is south pacific 2010 and our nearest neighbour is gazillions better off than us for having a compulsory scheme. Australian has vibrant capital markets and lots of money seeking a home that can fund innovation and growth. We don't. Would you have the NZX close down? no share trading of local stocks? or should the ASX take over? Contributions in Oz come out of your gross income so it is tax efficient as well. Seems like the only thing NZ can innovate is complex financial structures devised by wideboys to fleece blue rinse grannies out of their retirement savings. We've spent too long as economic illiterates and those third world countries from our post-colonial heyday - Malaysia, Indonesia, even Vietnam are now home to semiconductor plants and an emerging middle class. Stop spouting what you read somewhere ages ago in the column by the Roundtable
If NZX was such a compelling option then I would invest my money there - but alas not.
At least with my residentail property I can drive past and see it is OK, and do not need to worry that some high flying company director is doing a Shane Jones in an expensive overseas resort.
I could argue it on the economics - that is, Australia has allowed the mining of its minerals, etc, etc ... but that is not the point.
The point is a philosophic principle. Once you go down the road to the Gulag of State compulsion, the politicians don't know where to stop. Never forget the dominnt evil stalking this country is now the social democrats credo (I even heard Meryl Newman signing up for it on an interview this morning): that credo says a society is built on need, and that need can only be met by your money, and bending your volition and life before it. Read anything by Chris Trotter.
So why would they stop at compulsory saving? Compulsory healthy eating will probably save the country far more money. Compulsory prohibition is then a no-brainer ...
A free society, as with the NZX, would be far better served by Mr Harmos advocating for laissez faire ... and if he wants a firm target, getting rid of ETS, let him start there.
We are barely a year away from the biggest financial meltdown in generations created by the wonderful "free market" philosophies of the 80's and 90's in the US and around the world, and you are spouting your outdated drivel. A FREE MARKET DOES NOT WORK!
It is just human nature greed must be channeled in some way or we have the law of the jungle and utter chaos. Left to it's own devices an free Market destroys itself!
All typos above due to being so furious.
We don't have free markets, nothing like it (how can we with a central bank and regulation enough to fill libraries).
We have planned economies, and crony capitalism; that's the problem. And of course planned economies as well has never working, are necessarily based on planned societies. I want a free society.
There may be another planet out there that will give you a free society Tribeless, but it ain't mother earth!
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below