OPINION: Why I won't be investing in Facebook
Facebook’s daily user growth is slowing. While 6-10% growth per quarter feels like a lot when annualized, it is getting close to being a normal company.
The social network is running out of target market, and especially target market with pockets deep enough to be monetised.
The monthly active user chart is falling harder, and explains why I keep getting those annoying “Lance, you have notifications pending” emails. They are trying hard to keep these numbers afloat.
(Click any graph to enlarge)
The Summary Risk Factors deserves reading and thought (read Facebook's full SEC filing here). Be warned.
If we fail to retain existing users or add new users, or if our users decrease their level of engagement with Facebook, our revenue, financial results, and business may be significantly harmed;
Related to this is the boilerplate: Our business is highly competitive, and competition presents an ongoing threat to the success of our business;
This is the principal risk. If users migrate to Twitter and other platforms as Facebook follows in the footsteps of MySpace, Friendster and Bebo into uncool obscurity then the house of cards falls apart. Nobody can say what users will do, but the charts above should be the most closely watched, as well as the amount of time users are engaging.
We generate a substantial majority of our revenue from advertising. The loss of advertisers, or reduction in spending by advertisers with Facebook, could seriously harm our business;
This is the second biggest risk, though I would characterize it as a loss of ability to grow first, and the loss of current income levels second. Facebook is free, and so advertising is the primary way to make money. There is a strong tension between getting revenue from ads and the quality of the user experience. A lousier user experience means people will migrate to other platforms. As Facebook is going public the pressure will be on to ever-increase revenue, which in turn means more advertisements and in turn means a lousier user experience. It’s a tough circle to play in.
Growth in use of Facebook through our mobile products, where we do not currently display ads, as a substitute for use on personal computers may negatively affect our revenue and financial results;
Quite fixable
Facebook user growth and engagement on mobile devices depend upon effective operation with mobile operating systems, networks, and standards that we do not control;
Apple and Google could make things hard for Facebook on iOS and Android if they so choose, and they may do so.
We may not be successful in our efforts to grow and further monetize the Facebook Platform;
Facebook makes 17% of revenue from clipping the ticket on payments for virtual games. How sustainable is that?
Improper access to or disclosure of our users’ information could harm our reputation and adversely affect our business;
Privacy is still a major concern for Facebook.
Our CEO has control over key decision making as a result of his control of a majority of our voting stock;
I’m actually ok with this, as it hopefully means decisions will be made with respect to usability and long term sustainability rather than quarterly reporting. We shall see.
The loss of Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl K. Sandberg, or other key personnel could harm our business;
Quite.
Our business is subject to complex and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, and other matters. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation, and could harm our business;
SOPA and other draconian legislation ideas could have a real impact on Facebook. However having Facebook as a large listed company will increase their voice on the Hill.The question is how they will lobby.
We anticipate that we will expend substantial funds in connection with tax withholding and remittance obligations related to the initial settlement of our restricted stock units (RSUs) approximately six months following our initial public offering;
Put that in the valuation models.
The market price of our Class A common stock may be volatile or may decline, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the initial public offering price; and
Substantial blocks of our total outstanding shares may be sold into the market as “lock-up” periods end, as further described in “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.” If there are substantial sales of shares of our common stock, the price of our Class A common stock could decline.
This is going to be a rocky ride.
The standard revenue and expenses numbers look like this:
What’s interesting is looking at these on a per user basis. This is difficult to do as I don’t have the quarterly revenue figures to match with the monthly users, and even then we need to really get down to smaller periods so that the number of users is relatively static over the averaging period. In an attempt to get the weighted average I’m going with the end of 3rd quarter numbers of active daily users for this chart. Those users are worth about $8.12 each per annum right now.
Let’s try the active monthly users chart:
Most users are not active each day, and the average value of each of the people that checks Facebook at least once a month is just $2.12 per year.
Let’s thinking about those numbers in practical terms. As a user Facebook makes money from you if you are exposed (weak) or click (strong) on advertisements and buy things (very strong), or if you partake in the many social games and pay money to the provider through Facebook’s payment system. The question to ask is how often people are clicking on advertisements, and how effective they are. Facebook will be working hard to increase the effectiveness of advertising targeting, and on selling to adland, but ultimately the results are in our hands.
The question to ask as you make a decision to invest or not is simple – how many regular customers will Facebook have, how long will they have them for, and how much money per year will each customer deliver.
At the end of 2011 there were 483 million daily active users, and if we assume 6% growth for each of the next two quarters then 4% growth for the quarters after that then the Dec 31 2012 active daily users will be 587 million. The third quarter number would be 564 million.
At the moment the gross revenue per active user (at the end of the third quarter) is $8.12, a 20% lift on 2010, which was almost 25% up on 2009. Let’s assume growth of 17%, whihc gives a nice round $9.50 per active end 3rd quarter user per year.
That would mean total revenue of 564 million x $9.50 = $5.358 billion for 2012, 44% up on 2011. After that it gets interesting. Will Facebook users actually keep climbing? Will the average revenue per user do the same? How good will Facebook be at controlling expenses, which climbed over 100% from 2010 to 2011?
When it comes to valuing the company, think about the total amount of money that each active user will ever be worth Facebook. If active users were worth $10 each per year, then Facebook would need to keep 1 billion users for 10 years just to earn $100 billion in revenue. Subtract from that the expenses and the considerable time value of money, and we can see a large gulf when looking at hte $100 billion valuation.
However if the average revenue per active user crept up to $25, then 1 billion of them would deliver $125 billion in revenue per year, and an easy $15 billion or so in net. That will take a few year to get to, but justifies a $100 billion value.
So the questions to answer are simple: Can Facebook over double the number of daily active users, and Facebook over triple the dollars that each active user is worth to them each year.
From my own experiences, dropping out of active Facebook participation and using blogging and Twitter only, I see this is very difficult. It seems hard to imagine higher penetration of Facebook in most Western markets, and there are portends of an early adopter migration to elsewhere, including Google +, Twitter or nowhere in particular. The expansion into new markets is also problematic as the average revenue per user will be lower in those lower income per capita areas.
I wish Facebook luck with the IPO, it will be a good one, but I will not be investing.
Entrepreneur and industry commentator Lance Wiggs blogs at LanceWiggs.com.
Further reading: Facebook Files IPO: What It Means For You (ReadWriteWeb)
Signup to free NBR email alerts here






Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit















Comments and questions24
Hell yeah I won't be investing.
My own usage of the site dropped to zero in the past year and I'm just going to delete my account. It's a buggy, cluttered, horrible website who do everything they possibly can to make you share every detail of your life. Even changing your privacy settings is useless because they just move the goalposts and trick you into sharing everything. As for auto-share apps.....BYE!!!
Yep you hit the nail on the head. I know many folk who are closing their Facebook accounts down and many more who simply just leave their accounts unused. Many of the users who are left just post meaningless dreck which hastens the move towards the exit. The Emperor has no clothes - social media was always a flash in the pan.
Great Article
Like
Great strong points, but the thing is society will keep growing. More students will go off to college, more people will have the need to communicate across the world. As Facebook gets old to some of us, younger generations are coming up. Kids are getting cell phones as young as 5 years old now. There's plenty of room for growth and expansion.
Good article, but really the core FB user is aged 12-26, and not likely to read or leave comments at the NBR.
12-26ers are a key demographic, constantly refreshing (ie being born), eager to spend, and without the self-reflexivity to ask whether spending 4 hours a day on FB is a good idea.
In terms of growth, FB has zero users in China, so there's not reason why it can't launch a PRC-friendly version there.
Additionally, as there is more and more features in FB, there is synergy and more value (data-mining) added for investors.
Any IPO etc is always going to be a risk, and probably many of the above arguments could have been made for google's IPO, probably their disclosures were similar.
Talking about other sites, MySpace, Friendster - don't forget it was FB that killed these sites off, and that's why they're a joke, not because there's an economic law that says that internet companies can't be successful and market leaders long term.
Google + is from all respects dead in the water, and it may be that FB has various unique characteristics which may translate to long term survivability, and profitability for shareholders
You probably said the same about Google in 2004 and Trademe in 2005 ol boy! Business is only just getting 'into' FB , huge growth potential.
Nice to see some good analysis
I think a real wildcard here is the fact that a growing number of users really hate Facebook. They hated the recent changes. They hated being forced into Timeline. They hate the ads being thrown into the Newsfeed. It's just not fun anymore. And the $3.7 billion revenue seemed low to me considering they supposedly have 845 million users (including a few million dogs, cats and fictional characters). How much further can they grow? There are only so many people left on the planet. And how did they get to a $100 billion valuation? I don't get that either.
I see the future prospects of this company as pretty bleak. Maybe they'll have enough cash now to acquire other companies that will keep them afloat once Facebook becomes obsolete.
http://mankabros.com/blogs/onmedea/2012/01/27/facebook-and-the-disappearing-valuation/
informed debate: The issue with the new generations constantly coming on board is that they come on as groups of friends, and can choose FB or a new vehicle to do so. The switch away from other sites was sickeningly quick.
Gen Y: I advised Trade Me on the sale to Fairfax & the numbers we projected kept going as projected. It always comes back to the basics of revenue per customer and number of customers. In Trade Me's case we had a finite number of customers, NZ, and growing motors/property/jobs then travel businesses. For Facebook it's the global population with meaningful $ to spend and a question mark on categories. These days I regard a business linking to a Facebook page as not credible - I don't click.
Thanks everyone for the nice comments btw.
Unlike Apple where every time I buy something from iTunes I can see the revenue stream coming out of my wallet into theirs. Now that is a company. Perpetual renewals based on iTunes and finite lives of their products.
this article puts a lot of stock in user growth rates ... it's inevitable that these are slowing as Facebook commands a critical mass ... the question is how much opportunity there is to continue to monetize each user and with an average value of each of the people that checks Facebook at least once a month being just $2.12 per year I would say there is plenty of opportunity to do so .... most people don't get the web in terms of how to effectively monetize the masses but I'd say Facebook is off to a pretty good start.
Plenty of people out there spending hours on facebook and denying it to their mates at the pub, and in NBR comment boxes too! Every marketer knows what people say and what they do aren't often the same thing
Looks like a mature company to me...It seems the only way it will maintain its existing revenue base is by increasing expenses, & thereby reduce profits....
Invest at your own risk, cause it wont be me.
Ok we agree to disagree. but ask anyone under 30 and over 12 for their opinion and your jaw may well drop! 845m customers at a click and the business is 'mature' pfffffft !
Great analysis on the company, however you fail to understand the significance of this liquidity event. This is not a buy and hold opportunity for "investing", it is a chance for traders to flip the stock and make a quick profit. Buy and hold is dead as a strategy, the longer you stay in the more chance you will lose money.
Future developments of FB will be interesting if they want to challenge Google.
they,ll buy them ,just keep yer ears peeled for a sound . splish splash flop $$$
The key for me is who they manage to expand their product into other websites. Using Facebook connect to log onto other sites. eg. Techcrunch now uses Facebook for their comments.
Now imagine if Trademe did that for their comments. Then take that one step further and say trademe allows people to use facebook credits to purchase products.
Next step is your local coffee shop lets you use facebook credits to purchase coffee and since you are paying with Facebook, it has a built in loyalty scheme.
If they just keep it as a site for people to tell everybody "I am taking a sicky today and going to the beach" then revenue opportunities will be limited.
Google Plus is dead in the water? Have you actually used it. By that I mean used it properly and not just logged on for 2 mins and decided nobody is there.
Anyway you miss the point, it's Google Plus, not Facebook. They are different things entirely.
But anyway... 1. Google Plus is awesome. 2. Its better than Facebook 3. It's growing by 750k users per day.
Its only a matter of time before people using Facebook realise how much better Google Plus is and move over to that when all their friends realise it also. As soon as FB becomes uncool (which in my opinion it is already) everyone will move, quickly.
No wonder they are IPOing it now whilst they are at the top of the hill.
All it takes is someone on their staff to have a "light bulb" moment about how to make some real money off the membership and the share price would rocket. That is the only reason I would invest, and I would class it in the same vein as a junior mining play for risk.
There is no growth in the 12 - 26 age group. Everyone in that age group already has facebook and nobody is just getting facebook now in 2012. In fact, the growth is negative as there are a lot of people in that age group that are sick of using facebook and many are getting rid of it (reasons including the new layout, meaningless posts, don't want to waste their lives on a site).
The only growth is for older people (35+) that just want to get it because they think it's the new thing to do. But they are not going to be nowhere near as active users as the younger generation was.
> There is no growth in the 12 - 26 age group
Yes there is. Demographics are never static. Look at the birth rates and the size of each age group. Then think about the growing Internet penetration in developing countries. Massive potential for user growth.
العاب
العاب فلاش
العاب كرة قدم
العاب بنات جدة
العاب سيارات
العاب الطبخ الجديد
العاب ماريو فقط
العب العاب اكشن
العاب ذكاء والغاز
العاب نينجا قتالية
العاب دراجات النارية
العاب سبونج بوب فقط
العاب مكياج بنات فقط
العاب تلبيس هاى
العاب افلام الكرتون
العاب رياضية كرة
العاب قص شعر فقط
العاب نكلودين جديدة
العاب دورا فقط
العاب مغامرات سونيك
العاب بن 10 جديدة
العاب باربي
العاب طائرات
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below