Orcon plea to ComCom: don’t price us out of fibre cabinets

Orcon boss Scott Bartlett says Telecom Chorus’ roadside fibre cabinets offer scorching performance, and he wants his ISP’s gear in all of them - but can’t afford to at rates currently proposed by the Commerce Commission.

The ComCom has made positive noises in return (keep reading).

Mr Bartlett says he is completely sold on the technical need for neighbourhood cabinets, which bring fibre closer from a phone exchange to a closer to a customer’s door.

Orcon has a D-Slam (which links fibre from the exchange to a copper connection running to a customer’s house) currently on trial in a Telecom Chorus cabinet in Auckland’s Browns Bay.

However, he also fears that the Commerce Commission’s initial determination on what Telecom can charge rivals to place their gear in its cabinets (a mind of mini-me version of local loop unbundling called “sub-loop unbundling") is set to high.

In an open letter to Telecommunications Panel member Paula Rebstock, released this afternoon, Mr Bartlett uses relatively mild language in a general plea for the commission to “ensure viable competition results” when it makes its final determination on sub-loop pricing, expected during May or June.

Mr Bartlett doesn’t quote any dollar figures in his letter, but in comments prior to its publication, the chief executive broke down proposed cabinet costs for NBR, elaborating on figures previous quoted in Keallhauled from Vodafone’s point man on regulation, David Diprose (read: Roadside cabinets a roadblock to competition).

It would cost ISPs like Orcon $630 a month to rent D-Slam space in a Chorus cabinet, Mr Bartlett says, plus a further $700 to $900 in backhaul charges. Additionally, Orcon would have to pay $130 to connect each new customer to a cabinet, compared to $75 for an unbundled exchange - despite the cabinet connection process being easier, in Mr Bartett and Mr Diprose’s estimation.

Mr Bartlett says this pricing makes it uneconomic to install Orcon’s own gear. His ISP would need 20-25% market share in any given neighbourhood (each cabinet serves 200 to 300 homes). Yet no ISP, outside of Telecom, has anything close to that share.

With around half of urban customers scheduled to be served by cabinets once Chorus’s rollout is finished, Mr Bartlett says his company, and other ISPs, will effectively be shut out of 50% of the market.

Mr Barlett's plea answered. Maybe
A Commerce Commission spokeswoman responds: "The costs that Scott quotes have all been mentioned in previous drafts of the STD [Standard Terms Determination  on sub-loop unbundling]. However, it should be stressed that prices for the STD have not been finalised and are still under active consideration."

The commission will listen to all industry parties, "including Orcon and Vodafone" as it reviews its draft cabinet pricing, which the spokeswoman says was "based on a combination of costs and international benchmarking."

Telecom adds that if ISPs like Orcon and Vodafone don't like the Commerce Commission-set cabinet rates, they have the option of buying a feed from Telecom Wholesale (whose D-Slams, which occupy half the D-Slam space in each cabinet) as an alternative to installing and renting space for their own hardware.

Although he doesn’t include the theory in his letter to Ms Rebstock, Mr Bartlett contends that the commission has been unduly influenced by Telecom’s submission on pricing. “There’s a danger the final pricing will be ridiculously uncompetitive,” says Mr Bartlett.

While praising Telecom’s (network building) Chorus division for its customer service and widely-praised cabinet rollout, Mr Bartlett says that Telecom Wholesale staff (which sells access to infrastructure built and maintained by Chorus) have at times behaved like “a pack of mongrels”.

Mr Bartlett says that Telecom’s old “bullishness and arrogance,” absent since it was unbundled in March last year, has now returned.

A specific example, he says, is that the company refuses to tell Orcon the specific length of each copper cable running between a customer’s home and an exchange or cabinet, making it a lot harder for Orcon or another independent ISP to implement an upgrade to VDSL2 - the fastest flavour of copper line connection, which will supersedes ADSL2+, currently being rolled out. Telecom will roll out its own VDSL2 upgrade later this year.

Another criticism, voiced by Vodafone’s David Diprose, is that Telecom has not left enough physical space in its cabinets for rivals to install more than a single mini D-Slam, making it even less economic for others to install their own gear.

The commission has previously told NBR that Resource Management Act constraints prevented roadside cabinets from being made larger.

Comments

Telecoms Stranglehold

What do you expect? Telecom WILL retain control come hell AND - not or - high water. Telecom has Billions of $'s screwed out of us poor suckers to "fight" any inroads on their strangle hold on us, their poor suckers. Opposition! Roll out your own fibre optic cable. Do it 1st where an immediate profit is attainable then roll it out further as profits - and demand - dictate. If you can offer better service - AND PRICING - you will gain market share at Telecoms expense. DO IT!!!

fibre to the cabinet

this project is costing telecom millions of dollars to implement,there is nothing to stop orcon installing their own cabinets they should stop criping about the charges and get on with it

Resources management

@ Anonymous, actually there is something stoping orcon from installing their own cabinets, its unfortunately called the resource management act, which has already caused problems for NZ communications setting up their own Cell sites in certain areas.

re: cabinets

What rubbish! Telling orcon to install its own cabinets is like telling the bus company to build a new road if it wants to drive passengers about the place. We have one network, Telecom's. The govt forced Telecom to open its network to competitors and this is the last wriggle of a landed fish trying to avoid having to let anyone else into what it perceives to be its market.

Telecom has more than 60% market share in fixed line broadband because it locks competition out.

whingers

I'm starting to get sick of hearing Orcon and Vodafone whine and moan about Telecom - UCLL is and was never viable - maybe they should have planned for this when they started their roll outs - it has been a well documented plan of telecom's to cabinetize. Get over it.

At whingers

The well-documented plan you speak of detailed plans for Telecom to place cabinets on the very outer reaches of existing exchanges, thus boosting the speeds to people who were struggling to see the benefits of broadband by only receiving speeds of around 1.5-2mbps. What Orcon and Vodafone did NOT envisage was that, by 2012, the entire Auckland CBD would be cabinetised. This is only one example of how sly Telecom have been with their SLU rollout. The entire Auckland CBD is within 3km of the nearest telephone exchange (ie Airedale Street) and at that distance, the rates of even ADSL1 are still hovvering around the 7Mbps region. This is not what sub-loop unbundling was advertised as by Telecom when they announced their plans.

Competition

Telecom investor or what - you tell me...

If Telecom deployed its cabinets where the real needs were that would be great but they have made sure to stop competition for the likes of Orcon & Vodafone - of course no one else has even attempted to drive competition in this market - keep going Orcon & Vodafone

Whats the problem with the RMA?

How is this an obstacle for anyone wanting to install a cabinet?

100% of CBD will be cabinetised

So is it only people who are shareholders in Orcan and vodafone who are allowed to write complete fiction, or is it anyone?

Peter, research your reply before answering

Peter it's not fiction. There are roadmaps available on the Telecom website showing the cabinetisation plans for the five-year period beginning 2008. Cabinetisation was Telecom's side of the promise made to the government to get 10mbps+ to 80% of the country. Excuse me, but any ADSL2+ compatible exchange can deliver over 10Mbps to addresses up to 3.5km away from the telephone exchange. Why then are there numerous cabinets being installed throughout the Auckland CBD - a catchment area that is no greater than 3km radius from the Airedale Street exchange?

Final determination now out

The commerce commission has today released their final standard terms determination for sub loop unbunlding, and have unfortunately set the bar too high.

In order to build into the cabinets we (and Telecom's other competitors) would require a 30%+ market share. As of today all of Telecom's fixed line competitors combined struggle to get to this figure.

You can read more about this on our website.

Or, see the details of the final determination on the Commerce Commission site: http://www.comcom.govt.nz//MediaCentre/MediaReleases/200809/commercecomm...

Duncan Blair
Head of Brand and Communications
Orcon

Post new comment

The information entered here will appear with your comment.
Leaving this field blank will default to anonymous.

More information about formatting options