Packaging Council wary about side-effects of new plastic bag campaign
A new campaign pushing for a levy on all plastic supermarket bags used in New Zealand has received lukewarm support from the Packaging Council, which warns that households could replace the bags they use to contain rubbish with heavier gauge plastic containers.
The "Get Real" plastic bag campaign was launched over the weekend and is demanding that supermarket giants Progressive Enterprises and Foodstuffs start charging for plastic bags at their counters.
The campaign is being supported by several environmental groups and Sustainable Wanaka general manager Sophie Ward says the supermarkets need to show “real commitment” to reducing the number of plastic bags by charging for them.
“Burying almost a billion plastic bags in New Zealand landfills every year and having the rest end up in bushes and trees, in rivers and streams or ingested by wildlife is a big problem. Plastic bags are a waste of precious resources – alternatives exist.”
The campaign follows on the heels of The Warehouse’s recent announcement that is to implement a 10c charge on all its plastic bags.
But the Packaging Council’s executive director Paul Curtis says the idea of a mandatory charge needs to be put into proper context.
“We encourage all retailers to focus on ways to encourage shoppers not to take a plastic bag if they don’t need one. Internationally there are many different ways to achieve this including bag charges, loyalty points, promotion of ecobags and other incentives.
“However, it is also important to realise that as people reduce their plastic bag consumption they start buying bin liners and kitchen tidies. Research by AC Nielsen for the Retailers Association finds there had been a 16% growth last year in unit sales of these often heavier gauge plastics last year.”
Mr Curtis says plastic bags represent less than 0.2% of waste to landfill and they usually end up there because they have got people’s domestic rubbish in them.
“We need to be much smarter in New Zealand about closing the loop and recognising that one person’s packaging waste is another person’s raw material. And from an environmental perspective, there is also no point taxing plastic bags only to let other, heavier gauge, plastic containers fill the vacuum.”
He says these issues would need to be taken into account before introducing a mandatory bag levy through the Waste Minimisation Act, which requires a cost benefit analysis be undertaken to determine that the environmental harm caused by bags is greater than the cost of implementing the regulations.
The council’s voluntary campaign to reduce the use of plastic shopping bags is on target to hit 20% by July this year.
While the efforts of the supermarkets to cut down on the use of plastic bags were described as a “token effort” by Ms Ward, Progressive Enterprises, which along with Foodstuffs and The Warehouse signed the Packaging Accord in 2004, says it is doing its utmost to get everyone behind the reduction in bag usage.
Spokesman Bill Moore says the company was continuing to make good progress towards this goal.
“Our customers want to reduce their use of bags, but they also like to be able to use them as and when needed. If the government were to mandate a charge on plastic bags, we would of course support this move, but we believe voluntary efforts make the most sense.”
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit













Comments and questions15
Whilst I support a levy on plastic bags, replacing them with paper bags is not the solution - paper is heavier (much heavier than "thick" plastic bags), has higher embodied energy and uses many more chemicals to produce, polluting water ways in its production process.
Why arnt the supermarkets made to withdraw the plastic bags and go back to either paper bags or people bring their own? While they are at it maybe they can try to cut back on the large amount of plastic wrapping that products are encased in.
I agree. Wouldn't it be even better if bin liners, kitchen tidies and heavier gauge plastic containers were banned and replaced with biodegradable equivilants. This technology is available. Could a limited number of bin liners be supplied by councils as per the black rubbish bag system? A small change for consumers, which I am sure most would be happy to support and others would get used too, with great benefits for the environment - the answer is easy for me!
As members of the community that aren't involved with supermarkets beyond purchasing groceries it extremely easy for people to say that people should be made to bring their own bags or to use paper ones, however as an employee of a supermarket this is viewed by me as a ridiculous ideology.
The simple fact of the matter is that no matter how much people complain about plastic bags they make up an extremely small amount of waste in the nation's landfills and yet they are essential to retail stores.
As an employee of a supermarket I see that whilst a great deal of customers do bring their own shopping bags and/or try to get much less plastic bags this number is easily matched by the amount of people asking for more plastic bags and justifying this need by saying that they use said bags just like the article says, in place of heavy duty rubbish bags, kitchen tidies etc.
Ultimately, whilst I agree people should attempt to reduce their needs for these bags It isn't really realistic to place some sort of penalty on people simply because they wish their groceries to be carryable.
I try and remember to take my own bags to the Supermarket, but I don't always manage this.
However I would rather that they cut down on all the packaging in the meat department etc. I hate all those polystyrene trays etc that I collect each week.
Legilsation has a habit of unintended consequences. I agree with prior comments that banning or charging will simply result in substitutes likely worse as home users buy heavier guage rubbish tidy liners. The do-gooders need to think better.
Presumably the anti-plastic baggers are really about waste going to landfills. Fixing rubbish is easy. Try waste to energy which recaptures the energy for use while eliminating landfills.
Burning non-renewable resources, even if it is in the form of a plastic bag is not that intelligent .. the non-do-gooders like sMiles need to think better and provide viable solutions not just negative fuddle.
Reducing plastic bags is an obvious first positive step. That does not rule out future supermarket bags with proper life cycle design and post-consumer cost built in (not just an assumption the rate payer will cover it).
Make all plastic shopping bags biodegradable - this would completely eliminate the problem of plastic bags in landfill and waterways.
Joanna is right. Make bags biodegradable or or an easily recyclible material like grade one or two. We never have any spare bags in our home as they are all used as bin liners or containers for our other recycles.
This was implemented in Ireland several years ago and it was a great success. People adapted quickly and after being charged a few times at the supermarket and brought in their own reusable bags.
We like all types of containers, especially baskets.. As we are now an economic 'basket case'... :)
I agree charging! After charging of plastic bags in PaknSave and The Warehouse, I change my bad habit and always bring my own reusable bags.
it's great to see that the packaging council have moved from cold to lukewarm in their support for the idea of reducing the number of plastic shopping bags used.
They have the responsibility for working with their members to develop an effective product stewardship process for these bags under the packaging accord.
So far it seems that the best idea they can come up with is a one way trip to the landfill. Does not give me a lot of confidence in their ability to find good solutions for other packaging materials!
The Packaging Council fully supports all measures to reduce packaging consumption, including plastic bags - the Make a Difference campaign has taken 100 million bags out of circulation over four years. But when it comes to disposal, there are two quite separate issues, which require different strategies. The first is responsible disposal of plastic bags (i.e. reused - as rubbish bags, for example) and the second is irresponsible disposal (i.e. litter). For the first, biodegradable bags are not the answer because modern landfills are deliberately built to stop the contents from biodegrading. Biodegradation in a landfill creates methane gas and leachates. For the second, biodegradable bags may be part of the solution, but we would argue that changing people's behaviour to stop them littering in the first place would be more productive and beneficial to NZ society as a whole. Incidently, most bags in the litter stream are take-away bags and dairy bags - not supermarket bags. But as I said in the article, we've got to get a lot smarter about closing the loop in NZ. There are at least three companies in Auckland alone who recycle bags into valuable secondary products. One of them imports bags into NZ to meet demand - how mad is that? It's not mad though to consider energy from waste. For contaminated plastic packaging (e.g. silage wraps) it may be the only option. Energy from waste plants in Denmark provide 16% of the population with electricity - and they do it cleanly. We should not be so reticent in New Zealand to use this technology.
Sorry Paul, but I come from the next generation way of thinking. I studied in Canada, then immigrated here after being very effected by Canada's exploitation of its natural resources and the culture built around that in Western Canada.
As a mother of two young children, I have struggled with the issues of living in an ethical way. I'm not worried about people throwing down litter in the city nearly as much as I am about the fact that they never recycle-- even bottle and cans which are recyclable. I would like to address your assumption that if people don't have their plastic film grocery bags, they will certainly go out and buy heavy plastic liners for their landfill rubbish. In my experience, people who are actually making an effort to change their habits wouldn't do that. Firstly, Good magazine, the magazine for sustainable living in NZ, had an idea of using newspaper. But for me personally, I have really thought about this, and why not use the yellow trash bag directly? If I ever did need to use plastic to wrap anything, there is so much plastic on every product, that I always have a pile of it to use. However, a much better alternative is to never use plastic bags for anything. You can use hard plastic containers for kids lunches and sandwiches, and any purpose which you would use plastic wrap. Then, to reduce the rubbish, you just have to start choosing products which are more responsible in their packaging (or make your own bread e.g.) Worm farming or compost bins reduce unnecessary waste as well. There are ways.
When I first decided to stop taking plastic bags, it was a big step. I hadn't realized how often I get one until I stopped. It wasn't easy. However, I believe that this point of departure in thinking is what makes this step so important.
I believe that although it is really hard, we can find ways, creatively, to adapt our very set ways. If we can't, we have failed as a society.
I believe it is people who lack imagination about the future who should be stigmatized as lacking survival skills, not those who can.
Jute bags would be alternate to plastic bags.
Foe consultancy cntact
Subimal Palit
kanika6947@dataone.in
Mobile 0910 9433178548
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below