Parata fiasco symptomatic of government arrogance

Hekia Parata

[The government reversed its teacher-student ratio policy shortly after this column was written. Read Matthew Hooton's take on that development here - Editor.]

“Fiasco” is charitable.

Hekia Parata’s mishandling of school staffing has given the 2014 advantage to the Labour/Green alliance, over the Key/Peters alternative.

Ms Parata of course has a point. Seeing ever-smaller class sizes as a holy grail is comparatively new.

Reviewing my own primary classes at King’s Prep in the late 1970s and early 1980s, there were 19 in J1 but 33 to 34 thereafter.  At Auckland Grammar, classes averaged 35.  These are exactly the schools that unions say promote themselves as having smaller classes than elsewhere.

Meanwhile, Treasury boss Gabriel Makhlouf highlights research suggesting that moving from a class with an average teacher to one with a high-performing teacher is equivalent to reducing a student’s class size by 10 – far more plausible than arguing a class of 24 is always better than one of 27.

But all this is irrelevant. Even Mr Makhlouf agrees class sizes matter, a belief that has been drummed into parents.

It is a mystery that a government so petrified of touching big spending items like superannuation, Working for Families or interest-free student loans was so cavalier about such a sensitive issue, all to save $43 million, just 0.5% of this year’s $8.4 billion deficit. 

Transparency is best
As it happens, I was press secretary to then education minister Lockwood Smith when National last changed teacher:student ratios, in 1995.

To develop the policy, the minister chaired a Ministerial Reference Group of the School Trustees Association, principals groups and even the teacher unions, with all working collaboratively with officials to model different formulae.

The minister personally did much of the maths.

For the announcement, regional reporters were flown to Wellington for a seminar on all the detail, followed by a ministerial press conference in the cabinet committee room as the prime minister announced the initiative in parliament.

Dr Smith was so over the detail that he forgot his sound bites.

This meant, however, that he could tell Prliament that Turakina Maori Girls College would be worst affected, losing 2.6 teachers, while Cockle Bay School was the biggest winner, gaining 3.9 teachers.  Their new teacher:student ratios would be 1:13 and 1: 23.1 respectively.

Unlike Ms Parata, Dr Smith had some money to play with but, in both cases, most schools won while only a minority lost out.  All hell still broke loose of course, but the government was proud of what it was doing, transparent and had the sector groups onside.

Bolger vs Key

What can explain Dr Smith’s superior handling of a difficult announcement?

Having cut student allowances, dissembled over tertiary fees, promoted bulk-funding and trialled vouchers, he was number 3 only to Ruth Richardson and Jenny Shipley on the public enemies list.

Ms Parata, in contrast, is seen as a political star and potential party leader.

The first factor is the experience of being unpopular.  Dr Smith assumed a negative response to his announcements and prepared accordingly.

The second is the relative political skills of the prime minister.  Jim Bolger focused on things like bold economic and social reforms, eliminating the deficit in his first term, achieving 6.2% economic growth in 1994 and 5.3% in 1995, and winning three elections – meaning he never developed the stage talent of John Key.

That meant Dr Smith knew he didn’t have the backup of a popular prime minister to ride to his rescue if things went wrong.

 Third is the intellectual climate around Mr Key’s Beehive.  Previous prime ministers held all-day cabinet meetings and encouraged vicious cross-examination of ministers at caucus.

According to those with experience with both, Mr Key’s cabinet meetings are far more laid back.  Backbenchers are now discouraged from asking questions at caucus, which tends to focus on the latest polls.

The fourth factor is Murray McCully, the chairman of Mr Bolger’s communications apparatus.  As an electorate MP, Mr McCully knew to ask how any education announcement would affect Long Bay College.  Failing to answer meant postponing the planned announcement.

Mr McCully’s role is now held by Steven Joyce who has never stood for an electorate, let alone been upbraided by principals after local prize-givings.  Ms Parata has no electorate either.

These factors meant the Beehive thought it could hide the announcement in the bottom half of a pre-budget press release.

Now, on advice, Ms Parata refuses to meet the groups that even the arch anti-unionist Dr Smith worked with.  And all this is to raise $43 million for teacher quality programmes.

If Mr Joyce, as tertiary education minister, would just inflation-adjust his student loan portfolio, Ms Parata could have teacher quality programmes ten times bigger than envisaged, without changing teacher:student ratios at all.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about My Tags

Post Comment

15 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Here's a way to think about class sizes. You're teaching a year 9 English class, and you want to spend some time with each student discussing their writing and offering advice. From a 50 minute period, subtract 5 minutes for settling in and getting started, and 5 minutes for tidying up, setting homework, etc. Assuming nobody causes a distraction that takes some of your time, you have 40 working minutes. Anything over 20 kids will mean that your 1:1 contact will be less than 2 minutes per student. How do you teach anything useful in 2 minutes?

Reply
Share

Here's one clue: spread your individual advice over two periods.

Even better: give the class a lesson on how to critique their own writing, then have them critique their own and their partner's. Then mark their critiques.

Reply
Share

Year 9? That's third form right? Every third form English class in NZ has always had 35 kids. And third form teachers don't do 1:1 and nor should they. Toughen up a bit

Reply
Share

The damage done by the Government back down on this issue, right or wrong is immense.
My confidence in the Key lead Government to deliver the essential savings and corrections to avoid net external Government and private debt turning NZ into another Spain, Greece etc has been severely altered. The teachers may have won, but the country has lost. Government must say what it means and do what it says.

Reply
Share

"The teachers may have won, but the country has lost. Government must say what it means and do what it says." The teachers haven't won, all that has happened is that our high achieving education system didn't lose.

Reply
Share

matthew Hooten. If this is an arrogant government; HOW would you describe the Clark Cullen government???

Now that government was arrogance personified.

Reply
Share

@ R.J. Robert | Saturday, June 9, 2012 - 4:24pm "matthew Hooten. If this is an arrogant government; HOW would you describe the Clark Cullen government???"

Answer: successful.

Reply
Share

the best thing that Keys cn do now is to raise the eledgiblity for national super and then resign as promised

Reply
Share

Best thing you can do, is learn how to spell.

Reply
Share

gr8 u spotted this weekes deiberat mistake.

At least you read it. Hope JK acts on it.

Reply
Share

Now, if we could just get rid of the millions of tax payer dollars being carved from New Zealand schools and poured into private schools, and dump the Charter school nonsense, then we can get moving on improving on the 6th place in the OECD that our education system enjoys at present.

Reply
Share

Oh really?

Reply
Share

Matthew rightly points to the superannuation issue (that cowardly Key won't touch "as long as he's PM") and working for families etc. But surely it is Joyces billion dollar white Elephant roading projects that we should be rethinking in these harsh days of massive government borrowing to address the zero growth government policies?

Reply
Share

Prediction: this government will be despised more the Clark/Cullen govt. at the end of its run.

Imagine how much further it will be hated if it wins a third term?

Reply
Share

There is no level of arrogance from this government...yet. The main reason being that they are doing very little. Just tinkering around much needed bold changes.
It wont be what they are doing that upsets voters it will be what they are NOT doing.

Reply
Share

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.7850 0.0000 0.00%
AUD 0.8924 0.0000 0.00%
EUR 0.6196 0.0000 0.00%
GBP 0.4880 0.0000 0.00%
HKD 6.0917 0.0000 0.00%
JPY 84.8970 0.0000 0.00%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1231.3 -0.710 2014-10-24T00:
Oil Brent 86.1 -0.510 2014-10-24T00:
Oil Nymex 81.0 -1.020 2014-10-24T00:
Silver Index 17.1 0.024 2014-10-24T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5292.8 5344.4 5341.7 -0.15%
NASDAQ 4459.5 4486.3 4452.8 0.69%
DAX 9008.6 9044.9 9047.3 -0.66%
DJI 16677.0 16811.7 16677.9 0.76%
FTSE 6419.1 6419.1 6419.1 -0.47%
HKSE 23311.9 23352.6 23333.2 -0.13%
NI225 15354.4 15377.0 15139.0 1.01%