Parent group rejects smacking review findings

A group of parents at the centre of a review into the anti-smacking law say they reject the findings of the report.

Television psychologist Nigel Latta, Police Commissioner Howard Broad and Social Development Ministry chief executive Peter Hughes carried out the three-month review and concluded that none of the cases highlighted by pro-smacking lobby Family First stacked up.

Family First had used them as evidence that the repeal of Section 59 of the Crimes Act, effectively banning smacking for the purposes of correction, had failed.

Mr Latta reviewed several individual cases highlighted in the media and said he was personally reassured the law change made no difference to the way the police and social workers did their job.

But those parents said they were never consulted during the review.

"It appears that our accounts of what happened, and the supporting documentation we provided, including court, police and Child Youth and Family documents, to Family First has been ignored and the only opinion that matters has been that of the police and CYF," they said in a joint statement.

"This is a one-sided report and fails to objectively hear the evidence from both sides."

The families said they rejected the notion they had misrepresented the facts to Family First, and that the group was one of the few organisations willing to hear their side of the story.

"We are not child abusers, yet this report continues to make that accusation, and does so without providing an opportunity for rebuttal or a full assessment of the facts," they said.

"The effect of the experience of being investigated and, in some cases, prosecuted has had a huge effect on our families, including our children, yet this has been minimised or ignored."

Prime Minister John Key last week said the law was working the way Parliament intended, and that he would change it if parents were prosecuted for smacking their children lightly.

The review report contained several recommendations, including establishing a helpline for parents who were approached by authorities about smacking their children.

Comments

Smacking Law

Clearly John Key realises that this law is wrong, his reported comment - ' he would change the law if parents were prosecuted for smacking'.
That there is the possiblity of parents being prosecuted under this law for physically chastising an errant child, highlights the major flaw in this legislation; - no definition of 'smacking' or 'assault'.
The legislation needs to be repealed, because as it stands it makes good parents criminals by definition, and can only lead to more unruly children in our community.

hum drum

Time people to move on!!

Communism with NWO Guidelines

This is simply another tool used to implement control on the masses and looks like New Zealand will easily fit into the mould of the special interest groups that want a New World Order. These are the same vile humans that have tried to pass an International World Government under the guise of the Global Warming Fraud in Copenhagen or more to point Hopenhagen.

Clipboard Pointy Heads!

Why do parents still fear the knock on the front door by state authorities, even if the parent have done nothing to warrant it ,by a slight tap on their child's hand, by the time they get to school or where ever they can easily say they were beaten by a parent ,consequently a chain reaction kicks in?THATS WHAT PARENTS FEAR THE MOST ,being falsely accused.

Latta solution didn't work

This issue isn't going away. Key's government will get caned for their upholding this Greens-sponsored law in the same way that Labour did last election.

Problem not prosectution

The problem is that decent parents who know a smack is needed are now too frightened to smack because teh consequences of a Police investigation then CYFS involvement is too draconian.

Post new comment

The information entered here will appear with your comment.
Leaving this field blank will default to anonymous.

More information about formatting options