Member log in

Plus SMS problems run deep

NZX Regulation wants assurance that Plus SMS has appropriate corporate governance structures in place before the shares can come off suspension. Well excuse me, but when exactly has Plus SMS ever had appropriate corporate governance structures in place?

The scandal-plagued NZAX bottom feeder is a case study in poor corporate governance. It has cost investors millions of dollars, made a mockery of our so-called listing rules and securities legislation, while stamping another black mark on the reputation of this country’s capital markets.

News that the entire board of directors resigned last week – only to rejoin the company a day later as a result of “miscommunication” is unsurprising.

For a company that supposedly specialises in communication technology, its own record of communication is abysmal.

But the Plus SMS saga should never have got this far.

In late 2005, after a backdoor listing using the shell of RetailX, Plus SMS issued 240 million shares at 5c.

The shares shot to 82c, valuing the company at over $240 million, despite the company having no revenue, on the back of some blatant ramping on internet chat sites.

Then, of course, in September 2006 Plus SMS announced a "strategic review and restructure" while declaring it had made a number of "unrealistic statements".

“Some of its earlier news releases were "incorrect," the company said.

The Securities Commission launched its investigation shortly after, an investigation we are still waiting on.

Since then the company has farewelled its chief commercial officer, chief executive and chief financial officer in the past year. The company also apologized to founder Garry Donoghue for “any disparaging comments made about him by representatives of Plus SMS Holdings,”

Ex-chief executive Christopher Tiensch was forced out along with CFO Les Coates – a situation still being contested in US courts.

The case is likely to involve Tiensch’s remuneration. He was paid a staggering $642,706 in 2008 and was eligible for “share-based payments of a further $725,115.

That's a total package of $1.37 million - for a company that made a $7 million loss.

The question many shareholders are asking is who actually controls Plus SMS?

There are few clues are in the latest annual report.

The largest shareholder is Laddara Pty Limited with 11.10%. Absolutely nothing is known about this company.

The next largest shareholder is Hewon Capital with 8.05%.

Hewon is a European consortium led by internet entrepreneur Rob Hersov, who NBR understands has business ties to Hanover co-owner Eric Watson.

The third largest shareholder is EJB Limited, with 6.93%. A director of EJB is John Sorenson, a financier and backroom dealer, who was involved in Plus SMS's backdoor listing through the shell of RetailX.

The Securities Commission should release its findings soon before more investors get burnt.

More by Duncan Bridgeman

Signup to free NBR email alerts here

Comments and questions
6

Duncan - coudn't agree more with your comments. This company is an absolute shocker with an absurd "business model" that makes no sense whatsoever. I remember reading some of the ramping you mention and being dumbstruck at the way so many people seemed to believe it. This and Diligent aren't the sort of listings that do much for the credibility of the NZX. Looking forward to the Securities Commission report - must be just about finished by now, though it will need a brief postscript to cover the events of the last week.

Now why doesn't this suprise me, a friend of Eric is involved.

A CEO paid circa $1M to help loss $7M, how, selling short text message numbers to (for memory) a company who sell fixed line services.

For heavens sake this is not a Plus SMS issue, it is about the absolutely disgraceful governance of any investment vehicle in NZ. The lack of oversight is mind bogling. Why anyone would invest in a NZ listed company or NZ finance company is amazing.

Recall Feltex, ING, NZ Rail, Auckland Airport, Hanover, Blue Chip, the list will run for pages. All left retail investors with bloodied noses and in some cases not a single cent.

The Directors, Fund Managers, Trustees need to pay the price, that means jail time, loss of $s transferred from shells to trusts, removal of right to run any company for life, loss of Aston Martin and Ferrari, loss of Paratai Pad.

NZ may be small, but on a population adjusted basis the failure of NZX, Securities Watch Dogs, Govt etc have allowed losses that put us up there with the worst.

What a joke. Why would anybody have anything to do with these clowns.

I have been warning people about this company for years.

No-one listens.

The NZX is more interested in having as many companies listed on their exchange as possible. They couldn't care less about investors getting ripped. I'm convinced quantity is more important to them than quality.

Weldon Diplock etc dont do good governance Well not proactively their excuse is the law and regs dont allow them too. But rather than front the pollies and demand the laws and regs to do their job properly they prefer to sit in their office and look out at teh Wellington weather

The shareholders should remove the board and take control!

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>