While wharfies returned to work at the Ports of Auckland (PoAL) in early April after several months of strikes, the Maritime Union has gone on the charm offensive, reminding people the dispute is far from over.
In 'The Wharfies Story' - a glossy account from the workers' perspective - the union urges public support, while accusing the port company of being unwavering in its tactics, and compromising the livelihoods of the men who work the docks.
The most recent development in the year-long dispute saw the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) this week reject the union's bid to take its dispute to the Employment Court.
Since the lockout ended, however, reports about the dispute and whether it is any closer to settlement, have been far and few between.
This is seemingly because the port company wants to keep the status quo for now; the last thing it wants is another strike at Christmas.
But it may try its bid for contracting out jobs again next year.
For the public, however, it looks like the dispute has been settled, according to the wharfies story, which the union is distributing to local government officials, politicians and community groups.
But the dispute remains unresolved a year after bargaining started on a new collective agreement.
Despite the port being a council-owned and controlled organisation, "there is a real sense that the process and decision making around this dispute has not been open," the union says.
"There has been significant inconvenience and cost to customers.
"There has also been significant costs and inconvenience to employees of the port and their families - loss of wages and stress caused by a difficult working environment."
According to the union, wharfies are maintaining professionalism, despite losing many skilled workers due to the unfavourable working conditions.
It accuses PoAL of being unwavering in its 'take it or leave it' position to contract out jobs, and if the current course continues, both sides will lose.
"If we win, then the chances for a cooperative model of change will be hugely reduced, the workforce is likely to be spit because of the disruption 'winning' will cause, and workers are likely to have lost income and work opportunities," the union says.
"If the port win this dispute, then it is likely to end up with an inexperienced and unhappy workforce, little co-operation, poor quality jobs, a reputation amongst international union members as a bad employer and no guarantee of any productivity improvements or industrial peace."
The Maritime Union credits fellow unionists Simon Oosternman of the NDU, and Malcolm McNeill, Georgina McLeod and Bill Rosenberg of the CTU in helping product the booklet.
Labour List MP Carol Beaumont is also credited, along with FIRST Union's Sam Huggard, Rebecca Matthews and Bill Bradford.
By publishing a booklet explaining its side of the story, the Maritime Union hopes it will win over the public.
The union says it is "determined that the full story of this dispute is told and in particular that there is greater accountability and transparency."
Whether it achieves that is another matter, but it's a worthy tactic from a group apparently desperate to ensure it's message is heard.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
Most listened to
- Sunday Business with Andrew Patterson featuring David Skilling, Bernard Hickey, more
- Matthew Hooton on Labour party’s reaction to the budget 2016
- Rodney Hide says the attack by University of Auckland over overfishing is nonsense
- Do social bonds make sense? Tim Hunter tells Andrew Patterson it’s not just about the warm fuzzies
- Business Week in Review with Grant Walker & Andrew Patterson