Member log in

Who’s keen on Strategic Finance then?

Private Bin understands that Strategic Finance, which yesterday disclosed a staggering un-audited first half loss of $99.8 million, is close to announcing a debt-for-equity swap deal with another company.

Strategic, which owes debenture-holders about $280 million, bond-holders $23 million and perpetual shareholders $50 million, needs a potential Hanover-style debt-for-equity deal to avoid receivership.

The company is to update the market on its preferred options with its trustee shortly.

Private Bin is intrigued to know which company might be interested in Strategic, if any.

The rhetoric points to a listed, or at least liquid, entity because no one else would have the equity to pull it off.

Private Bin doubts that Allied Farmers would get this one past its shareholders, given the difficulties with the Hanover assets it’s experiencing right now.

South Canterbury Finance? Don’t think so – it seems to be going its own unique way with principal Allan Hubbard doing his hardest to keep the company afloat while still retaining an interest.

Who does that leave then? ANZ-owned UDC might have been a possibility but it has absolutely no ambitions to enter the property finance game.

Of course there is always statutory management, an idea that appeals to the Shareholders' Association. But that would mean further risk for the government already exposed through the deposit guarantee scheme.

Private Bin is stumped. Comments and predictions are welcome.

More by Duncan Bridgeman

Comments and questions
5

Why rule out SCF?

If they did an equity swap, and it was approved by the Strategic investors, it would only improve SCF's liquidity position - no way for it to be negative.

Alan.

The way Strategic was run you can be sure that there are more stinkers to come & have they even accounted (made provision) for the losses to come on the likes of Soho? They related lending needs to be identified as well. SCF would be a good vehicle for Strategic which was a fundamentally good / innovative company until its Directors got greedy and sold to Allco & the lending rules went out the window. How do you end up with $70m owing on a site bought for $10m that was probably only worth $5m to start with.

One of the names mentioned did DD on the book but walked believing the the real asset value to be a very high double-digit discount even on today's reckoning by Strategic. Strategic have further poisoned some assets by failing to deal with serious offers.. I wonder why !! Receivership is surely inevetable.

the goodfellows via their lock finance, at the right price, they have the cash but would want a serious discount. Fisher & paykel also have lots of cash but no one to lend it too, the credit card and HP market is saturated and they have looked at property in the past.
or how about HBOS just taking it over.

it is very hard to predict what will happen next at Strategic finance. but if the competition will use the Online Forex Broker, they will have an average forecast of what to expect. it is a step forward, good for business.,

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>