Real estate sector in 'recovery' mode – REINZ
"Strange how the RBNZ do not think there is a problem with house price/ rents inflation now."
Featured commentHouse sales eased in June in keeping with seasonal trends, the Real Estate Institute says.
While sales were down by 14.5% compared to May they were still well ahead of June 2011 with 6135 sales, an increase of 906, or 17.3%.
The national median house price rose $3000 to a record high of $372,000.
This is up 3.3% compared to June last year, with Auckland maintaining the $500,000 record median set last month.
Compared to June 2011, Canterbury/Westland enjoyed the biggest sales jump, up 56%, followed by Northland, up 39.1%, and Hawke's Bay, up 25.6%.
Auckland’s sales increase over June 2011 was 15.7%. Only Taranaki recorded a fall in sales volume compared to June last year.
Central Otago Lakes recorded the highest lift in prices for June 2012 with an increase of 11.5%, followed by Northland on 10.0%, and Wellington with 6.9%
The REINZ Stratified House Price Index, which adjusts for some of the variations in mix that can impact on the median price, is 5.3% higher than June 2011 and is now also at a new record level.
The House Price Indices for Auckland and Christchurch are also at new record highs in June.
Keen buyer interest in Auckland and Christchurch made up about half of national activity and drove the market to new highs, Real Estate Institute chief executive Helen O’Sullivan says.
She cited a shortage of properties available to meet buyer demand that is most acute in Auckland, where new home building is still sluggish, and in Christchurch, where the earthquake recovery is slowly gathering speed.
The national median days to sell improved by one day in June compared to May, from 38 to 37, and improving by seven days on June 2011.
Canterbury/Westland had the shortest days to sell at 31, followed by Auckland with 32, while Central Otago Lakes recorded the longest number at 81 days, followed by Northland with 80 and Taranaki with 61.
Ms O’Sullivan says the market is not “booming” but “recovering”.
# When inflation is taken into account the market is about 12% below the market height of late 2007.





















Comments and questions17
If you pour petrol (record low interest rates) on the house price fire this is the inevitable consequence.
It would seem Bollard is quite happy to reflate the housing bubble.
Strange how the RBNZ do not think there is a problem with house price/ rents inflation now.
According to the RBNZ about 4 years ago, house inflation was going to ruin the economy etc and they put interest rates up. I bought a house at auction about 4 years ago and the auction was very subdued compared to now.
I am looking for a house in Auckland now and have attended 2 auctions in the last week. It was almost like a buying frenzy with buyers not seeming to care what they pay. I presume their attitude was that someone will pay them more for their house later than they paid.
Politicians seem to have their heads in the sand over this as most have numerous rental properties.
While incomes are low and unemployment is relatively high I can only assume people are borrowing to the limit to buy housing. I know of a property investor who was lent 95% of the value of a house.
This bubble can only end in tears for many people who have borrowed too much in the hope that this propery bubble will continue.
And you think that the RBNZ can control house prices?
Those who do not learn from the past....
Kiwis think it is different here. But it's not. The bubble will once again pop.
We just have to look across the tasman and see what is happening to melbourne now.
The prices in Auckland are ridiculous. Leaky homes, uninsulated homes and unscrupulous agents make it a mine field for any purchaser.
I am a professional person and I refuse to pay inflated prices for dodgy buildings on the North Shore. Immigrants (and I am one of them) have been conned into paying horrific prices for rubbish houses.
Auctions are, as stated by another reader, feeding frenzies for people petrified they won't be able to get on the property ladder. Mortgaging themselves to the hilt. This is definitely a disaster about to happen.
It is not sustainable. Incomes are low (don't fool yourself and think they aren't much better elsewhere) and accommodation is high. Soon it'll be linke London, with multiple families in one house. This is not the environment that is "sold" to professional immigrants by NZ Immigration.
And before readers tell me to "go home" - this is just an objective veiw based on living in many first world countries. It is a basic economic reality.
The Auckland City Council needs to be more pro-active about future planning. And squashing families into apartments is not the answer...
funny thing about living in germany etc is that the rental accomodation is actually quite good. Apartments are quite well insulated so very little sound from other apartments, if any, and rules of occupancy which mean you do not have disturbances in the middle of the night. The problem here is you never know what nutcase is going to be living next to you next and have little means of curbing antisocial habits other than look elsewhere when it happens.
Affordability and supply/demand are two completely different things not to be confused. What we will continue to see is a polarisation of house prices. Those who are on good incomes will continue to pay what they need to in order to get the property that they want. This will have a 'rising lid' effect on the market, with those on lower incomes having to settle for less in terms of location/quality than they may have a year or so ago. Yes, this may include sharing houses or kids staying with Mum and Dad longer. Supply has virtually stopped, due to lack of 2nd tier finance companies, lack of 'willing' and able developers, and recent property tax changes (LAQC etc) and it will take a good 3-4 years for the supply side to ramp up again. This will inevitably create a bubble which is driven primarily by supply constraints instead of speculation or low interest rates. Even when interest rates increase, prices must continue to increase (simple economics) but again, the quality/location equation will change. Those on the higher incomes will still continue to pay what they need to, because they can, and those on lower incomes will settle for even less than they do now. Wisdom does suggest that those buying now should lock in their loans for 3 - 5 years, but say budget on 7% and put the balance of cash away in a 'buffer' account. However, given the continued weakness of the global economy and low nflation; with some picking deflation in economies with high levels of QE, I would suggest that RBNZ will not be able to even consider significant rate rises for a year or so. Affordable housing, that many are calling for, quoting examples from Australia, is not an option in N.Z. because we simply don't have the economies of scale. And the government (the taxpayer) certainly cannot and will not afford to provide further State-owned housing. Morever, the priority for housing is Christchurch. No simple answer but house-price growth is inevitable under the backward correction in 3-4 yrs time when supply starts to exceed demand, as it always does (standard systems theory).
qualification to the above. Supply and demand tend to meet eventually, it just being a question of when. Why is Ryman doing so well? age of population. In 15 years time who will be living in a retirement village and who will be in remuera? You can't get into the retirement village without selling the house. But who will buy? and at what price? Surely not similar aged people also 15 years older than now. This will be where the rubber hits the road for those in the high range property market who need to sell, and there will be a lot. All very well to have a 3 million dollar property, but someone has to have 3 million notes to buy it off you and what if 40% of your neighbours also have realtor signs out
You said:
"Even when interest rates increase, prices must continue to increase (simple economics) but again" This makes no sense. how can prices increase when the interest rate to service the debt is also increasing. This is not simple economics as you would suggest and if you think so I suggest you look at markets where that has happened and see that on average in the US prices dropped 20% in the early 80's when that was the case.
Heritage - the economics is based around supply and demand. You misunderstood my comments. If I am in a market of limited supply e.g tomatoes, then if I have a high income then I'll keep paying what I need to for the tomatoes I want. In property terms this means the 'lid' of the market keeps rising. However, for those on a fixed budget they will stop buying tomatoes which, in property terms means that those people now need to accept a lower quality property that fits their budget i.e. cabbage instead of tomatoes. That does not mean that people stop buying - quite the contrary. Fallacious reasoning to compare with US and Ozzy markets etc. If anything they had a supply glut, not a rapidly growing 3-4 yr supply shortage pipeline as per N.Z. Simple economics but its important to understand the whole context. I predict a correction in 3-4yrs assuming that supply catches up. Other issue is affordability but that is due to naiive Kiwis wanting their cake (i.e. no mining) and eating it as well (i.e. standard of living). Another debate eh!
From the global financial press:
During Q2 New Zealand has been negatively affected by a strong currency, weak economic outlook among its major trading partners, and the fear of a slowdown in global growth. The decline in the survey was fairly modest relative to recent pull backs in the data. The modest declines come at a surprise given the fact that the Euro-Zone crisis now posses more a threat to the health of the New Zealand economy than ever before. Recently many of the economies linked to the Euro-Zone have begun to cut interest rates, which hurt New Zealand trade advantaged. The effect to the New Zealand currency is compounded by the lower demand for New Zealand exports.
so go ahead and buy that house. In the end when interest rates go up and people can no longer afford to pay their mortgages, it will all come crashing down. The greater concern is DEFLATION and not inflation.
Well there's a dozen or so people above who are going to be kicking themselves in 10 years again when house prices cyclically double. Get in there boys, house always appear expensive.
know people (house buyers not developers)who have sold for less than they owe the bank. you will never read about them nor will they inform you of their plight, largely due to the fact they still owe their bank a truck load at personal loan rates and will do so for some time.
You must either be a real estate agent or a mortgage banker.
Trouble is NZ have economists taught by economists that were taught by economists and so on.
House prices are due to supply and demand. Simple.
Interest rates are part of the price. DOH!
If the "experts" think that prices are rising too fast, then they should raise the deposit required and raise/enforce the "dealers" tax.
Raising interest rates hurt those that are most productive in society.
And how stoopid is that???
But they do it. Why? because they were taught by economists that were taught by economist who in turn were taught by economists................. If it wasn't for the innate stupidity of our politicians, nobody would listen to them.
Houses shouldn't be considered investments; a store of wealth like precious metals, to some extent, perhaps, but still wealth that is illiquid and susceptible to rapid devaluation. Over the past 30-40 years Kiwis, drawn in by the enthusiastic upward ratcheting of property prices far exceeding the rate of general inflation, have been led to believe that houses only go up in value and can pay for themselves in the form of rent and, as such, are an investment. This is a dangerous belief based on faith rather than careful reasoning and analysis of the facts. One day we will see all those book and seminar peddling property gurus from a few years back as well as many real estate sales people for the charlatans and snake oil salesmen they really are.