Member log in

Sanford convicted in US, no appeal decision until sentencing

BUSINESSDESK: Sanford managing director Eric Barratt says the Auckland-based fishing company won’t decide whether to appeal a guilty verdict in a US court of dumping oil waste in waters around American Samoa and falsifying records until after sentencing in November.

“Any decision on an appeal would only be made after sentencing,” Mr Barratt told BusinessDesk from Washington.

“The decision was naturally disappointing but the case highlights the need to work diligently to properly maintain the required logs and records regarding the management of oily wastes aboard vessels,” he says.

Mr Barratt had vowed to vigorously defend the charges brought by the US Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia and the US Department of Justice and appeared in person to give testimony.

Sanford was found guilty on six of seven counts relating to failure to properly maintain the tuna vessel San Nikunau’s oil record book and the obstruction of port state control inspections by the US Coast Guard.

The case stemmed from a Coast Guard investigation in American Samoa last year.

Each count carries a maximum penalty of $US500,000, meaning Sanford could be liable for fines of up to $3 million. The company was found not guilty of one obstruction of justice charge and a forfeiture claim against Sanford for $US24 million of proceeds from the fish catch was withdrawn.

Sentencing is set down for November 16.

The San Nikunau had dumped oil from its bilges without taking steps to ensure it didn’t cause pollution and later claimed pollution prevention equipment had been used, prosecutors said.

Sanford operates three large-scale freezer tuna purse seiners in the Pacific. The San Nikunau’s catch was processed in Pago Pago.

Sanford shares last traded at $4 and have declined 2.2% this year.

Comments and questions
6

First Kim Dotcom and now Sanford - the US authorities having to act when our own don't. Imagine the revenue in fines for our economy if our justice system pursued felons instead of pretending they don't exist.

We prosecute foreign owned shipping companies that pollute our waters, just as the Yanks have charged Sanfords for polluting their waters, so can't see the connection you are making.

Sanford will need to change the statement on their web-site from:

'We seek to act responsibly in our commercial operations in accordance with international best practice in the marine and coastal environment'

to:

'We are convicted pollutors of the marine environment'

Actually, much as the DOJ would love to claim otherwise, the jury did not find that Sanford, or Mr. Pogues, dumped either oil or oily waste anywhere. This was a case of deliberately misleading paperwork, and a water discharge in Samoan waters.

Ummm it was oily water - the oil/water separator was intentionally bypassed by crew (who were aware of MARPOL obligations)

Nice try.

Come sentencing date, I hope they get gutted and filleted to the tune of a couple of mill.