Savings group proposes national 'tithing' to fund pensions
BUSINESSDESK: A major new report on the pension system proposes New Zealanders gradually lifting their savings to 10% of annual income, and allowing the age of entitlement for universal state pensions to move up as life expectancy increases.
The equivalent of the biblical system of tithing, where 10% of income is set aside for the church, the proposal from the Financial Services Council would allow people to start tapping their pension savings at the age of 65, and to buy insurance against premature death, loss of income through illness or disability and through investment failures close to retirement age.
With almost half the population forecast to be living to the age of 100 by the 2060s, the report says the focus for pension reform should be aimed squarely at New Zealanders who are under the age of 40 today.
The report is the first from the FSC after the amalgamation of two financial services lobby groups and represents most of the New Zealand investment, savings and banking sector, which have struggled for years with low private savings rates outside of residential property investment.
Under the proposal, New Zealanders would be "encouraged" - the report deliberately avoids a position on making retirement savings compulsory - to raise their superannuation savings rate to 10% of annual income, with individuals and their employers paying 5% each.
KiwiSaver contributions are moving to 6% of annual income, paid 50/50 by employers and employees.
The result would be to more than double retirement income for today's under 40 year olds by the time they reached retirement age, the council's chairwoman, former National Party Prime Minister Dame Jenny Shipley, said.
The report calculates that a man on a median lifetime income turning 65 in 2061, after saving for 40 years, would receive a NZ Super and KiwiSaver Plus income of $42,016 a year, an extra $281 a week in retirement above NZ Super. For women it would deliver $32,897, an extra $106 a week.
The FSC suggests this personal "KiwiSaver Plus" retirement plan, if used from the age of 65 irrespective of the entitlement age for the universal pension, would allow the purchase of a fixed term private pension equivalent to today's New Zealand Superannuation.
"It would fill any gap between 65 and a time in the future when the age at which people qualify for NZ Super is likely to be extended as longevity increases. As the saver’s own pension, the fixed-term pension could be taken to anywhere in the world," the report says.
Lump sum payouts would also be permitted.
The report earned early caution from Retirement Commissioner Diana Crossan, who told Fairfax Media that many New Zealanders would struggle to set aside 10% of their income because the country's wages are "so low".
The proposal says the government should top up KiwiSaver Plus accounts of people who had spent long periods out of the workforce, such as women raising families, and people who had earned "very low incomes" throughout their working lives.
The paper comes as the Labour and Green parties support a rise in the pension entitlement age to 67, while Prime Minister John Key is sticking to the current age of 65 to keep a political promise.
The report projects that 52% of women and 44% of men will be living to 100 years of age by 2061, and notes life expectancy beyond 65 has nearly doubled in the last century.
"This longevity increase would require a 28% increase in current tax rates if the age of eligibility for NZ Super remains the same," the FSC paper says.
"At the same time, New Zealanders feel they need about $300 more a week than NZ Super is currently paying in order to live comfortably in retirement."
“We urge all stakeholders and political leaders current and future to see this as both an opportunity and an obligation: we hope new partnerships can emerge where public policy, private enterprise and personal endeavour converge and conclusions can be drawn," said Shipley.
The report suggests the shift to contributions equivalent to 10% of income could happen gradually, at the rate of 0.5% annually.
"For people currently not contributing to KiwiSaver, the FSC suggests starting contributions from employers and employees at only 0.5% in the first year and increasing that amount each year."
Under such a proposal, the rate for people already contributing to KiwiSaver would not increase until the standard contribution rate was higher than their current rate of contribution.

























Comments and questions14
Large self-interest flag waving here.
Could not agree more, Winston Peters is correct to emphasise economic growth and have an economy that can afford to support Superannuation.
What dictates the standard of living now and in the future is the economic output of the country. The best investment any country can make is to invest in the future wealth generators, which is the health and education of the current and future workforce.
You are right. Gotta watch this lot looking for any angle. Wont be your and my best interests they have at heart.
They must have been reading," The Richest Man in Babylon". If you smoke over your working life that is the eqivalent of $500,000 wasted.
Security and prosperity is sometimes just a choice of life habits.
Of course nearly all our political thinking is to take from success (savers) and reward failure(bad choices).
Who is going to fund these inter-generational welfare recipients and chronic solo mothers ??? i don't want to,Maybe we can shuffle them onto the Mari Party.
Wow! and just who do we give our 10% nto now? Surely this must be given to the members of the financial service council as they have no self serving vested interest and can be trusted to protect our interests...Yeah right.!!
Good examples from overseas to follow - like Australia and Singapore, where compulsory savings have given huge boost to economic growth and security.
That is what NZ has to do - make the hard decision now and watch the savings grow, and in turn, economic growth.
Learn from your history - your Mr Buffoon Muldoon scrapped compulsory savings in 1976 and brought in 8 years of economic backwardness and left NZ crippled.
On June 1, General Motors released information that they plan on reducing their pension plan liabilities by an expected 26 billion dollars. GM hopes to accomplish this by offering selected U.S. GM retirees an option to take a lump-sum payment, while other retirees may continue to collect monthly pension benefits. Additional plan details have been outlined as a guide at this website: http://www.gmpensionbuyout.net. Because of the plan complexities and the July 20, 2012 deadline, it is suggested that affected plan members seek advice from a qualified financial advisor.
As a reasonably young person I expect to not receive NZ Super when I retire, it is a choice I made to personally responsible for my own success. I agree that we all need to be saving at least 10% towards retirement, on a purely mathematical basis, my concern is that we are too politically correct in this country to admit the real issue is people's lack of personal responsibility for their own actions and how they affect others.
Good on you!
Well put, DO NOT TRUST ANYBODY WITH YOU SAVINGS. YOU KEEP CONTROL.
Here is a tip for the Government. Never allow or pay any politician past or present to speak on saving and investment. Especially when their own performances after leaving parliament have been so dreadful. What really do they offer but platitudes and propaganda? Look at the Lombard Three. And Ruth Richardson, Roger Douglas, and Jenny Shipley have all left public listed companies in less than healthy states. Now we have Jenny Shipley paid by us to tell us how to save while we subsidise her life pension as well.
There is no value in these forecasts. They are just distractions and mischief making by those who want government to force you to pay money into "funds" that they will run ( or runaway with your money) at ridiculous fees and bonuses Rule 1 : don't ever trust the politicians to look after you with your own money or anyone else's money unless you are a bludger Rule 2 : don't let politicians steal your hard earned money to bribe slackers into voting for them to use your money Rule 3 : you have to plan to look after yourself, anything else is just a bit of luck, expect the unexpected.
The plan allows an option for select U.S. GM retirees to accept a lump-sum offer, while other GM retirees continue their monthly pension plan payment. This website offers a helpful guide that outlines the new plan details: http://gmpensionbuyout.info/?page_id=28 Because of the complexities that a lump-sum buyout offers, it is suggested to meet with a qualified financial advisor before the plan deadline of July 20, 2012.