Shakeout from Mainzeal failure could raise competition issues

The most important result of the collapse of Mainzeal Construction is likely to be closer scrutiny from the regulators.

The government is already concerned about the level of competition in the construction sector, with a high level of dominance by the top three firms: Fletcher Building, Hawkins Construction and Mainzeal (in order of size).

Fletcher Building, in particular, has been mentioned by ministers as a highly dominant player in the sector and the Productivity Commission last year, in a lengthy study of housing affordability, highlighted high prices as a factor pushing costs up.

Total construction costs rose by 30% in real terms in the nine years to 2011, with large increases recorded over the 2000s house price boom.

“The cost of residential construction in New Zealand is significantly higher than in Australia, with negative implications for housing affordability,” the report concluded.

For example, building costs per sqare metre are estimated to be around 15% to 25% lower in various Australian cities than they are in Auckland.

The Productivity Commission’s lengthy and comprehensive report did not recommend any action on competition issues, and noted the Commerce Commission had brought a number of actions – mostly unsuccessfully – against larger firms in the sector over the recent decade.

The government has, however, not ruled out making a closer examination of competition issues in the industry.

Asked at a briefing on housing affordability late last year if the government would be looking at Fletcher Building’s role in the sector, Finance Minister Bill English said it would be “difficult to look at competition in the industry without looking at Fletcher Building”.

At this stage any examination of competition issues has been ruled out until the second half of the year, but a move by Fletcher Building to snap up the remnants of Mainzeal would cause greater concern at a political and regulatory level.

Fletcher Building has not ruled out such a move and has indicated it has the capacity to take up Mainzeal’s existing contracts.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about My Tags

Post Comment

3 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

A fair chunk of the 30% rise over the nine years you could put down to Local Authority compliance costs , E2 and E3, Health & Safety regulationsand the Holidays Act it certainly isn't due to lack of competition. There are plenty of other bigger players in the market now eg Naylor love who are any bit as godd if not better than your big 3?

Certainly Fletchers have a monopoly on the plasterboard linings with Winstones Gib.Board but the ministry has known about that for years and has nothing proactive about it.

I understand another wallboard supplier Knaff? is being considered in Christchurch, but I would almost put money on the fact that Fletchers are letting them in on the basis that no other board will be acceptable, knowing very well they would struggle as theloan supplier in CHCH.

I'm not sure if you can directly compare NZ house costs to Aust, they don't have E2 & E3 quite like us because of the drier more temperate climate.

Reply
Share

How did ETS costs help them survive??

Reply
Share

I'm dubious the National government would bother to tackle Fletcher Building on anything. I recall early on in the EQ coverage that Key would often be seen "coincidentally" in front of a Fletcher's site ... then funnily enough they became the major contractor for the EQ recovery business.

John Key and Roger Sutton have also been far too keen to downplay the role Mainzeal had in ChCh's recovery, even though they have been consistently named as one of the big five construction companies in ChCh.

Fletchers have things wrapped up nice and tightly, plus they can rely on Placemakers to cream the most of the building supply profits off, too.

Reply
Share

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.7990 0.0030 0.38%
AUD 0.9056 -0.0015 -0.17%
EUR 0.6233 0.0009 0.14%
GBP 0.4937 0.0009 0.18%
HKD 6.1985 0.0227 0.37%
JPY 85.1130 0.0280 0.03%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1244.2 5.700 2014-10-20T00:
Oil Brent 85.4 -0.760 2014-10-20T00:
Oil Nymex 82.8 -0.040 2014-10-20T00:
Silver Index 17.3 0.020 2014-10-20T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5197.9 5238.9 5197.9 0.68%
NASDAQ 4254.2 4316.9 4258.4 1.35%
DAX 8819.3 8834.7 8850.3 -1.50%
DJI 16373.1 16401.6 16380.4 0.12%
FTSE 6310.3 6320.3 6310.3 -0.68%
HKSE 23073.4 23231.5 23070.3 -0.25%
NI225 15115.3 15115.3 15111.2 -1.25%