Shakeup for Wellington property
Wellington City Council is looking to dramatically change its rules for property, with district plan reforms voted on this week including altering its regulations for density, urban design and height restrictions.
The changes are designed to support population growth and could potentially affect most Wellington homes because the majority of the city is included in the proposed changes.
In residential areas changes include density restrictions increasing to medium in areas around some housing centres, starting with Johnsonville and Kilbirnie.
“This is an important step in allowing more people to live closer to services and public transport, and to a more sustainable city better equipped to adjust to the threats of climate change and peak oil,” a council spokesman said.
“We have some greenfields development provided for, but it is also important that we don’t rely on sprawl as so many cities have with all the transport problems that brings.”
A new residential design guide in the urban design rules would require multi unit developments provide certain amounts of sunlight, open space and privacy with character inner suburbs like Mt Victoria, Aro Valley, Thorndon, Mt Cook and Newtown having specific rules.
Oriental Bay would have increased allowances for ground floor commercial activities for the public to use. The residential development height in Johnsonville would be reduced from ten metres to eight metres.
“We want to ensure traditional suburban centres thrive because they are the hearts of communities, have a lot of investment in public facilities – libraries, community centres etc, are served by public transport and are places where people can do a lot of things in one visit, reducing transport requirements,” a council spokesman said.
“They are places for small retail, and high repeat visit destinations like malls and supermarkets. Higher quality design, active frontages (not blank walls), verandas are all important and will be required. Above ground floor residential is encouraged.”
“Epic,” “marathon” and “long-running” were just a few of the words the council used to describe the four years of consultation and seven week hearing earlier this year about these changes.
City councillors vote on the changes this week and the new rules will come into effect on September 28 if voted in.
Signup to free NBR email alerts here
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit















Comments and questions3
More new urbanism nonsense - the planners know best. Wgtn can't really afford this nonsense - it lags behind Akl and Chch as it is.
The new District Plan is about the size of half a dozen phone books - just madness - no one can work out what they can and can't do - so they do nothing.
Weak council + strong planners = dead city.
They introduced these plan changes the day before the RMA changes which would have given no weight to proposed plans until hearings and decisions were final. So they went against the Govt (ie the people) to get their control freak ideas set in place - nice. The WCC is a joke around he country - wins all the "unfriendly to business' awards.
But if you are making a film they pay for your monuments and to do up theatres for you. But the building industry in Wgtn is worth over a billion dollars a year - but they seem to try their best to stop everything. Nice to have teh luxury from you council desk I guess.
I think the plan changes show a mature and sustainable response by the Council in addressing issues such as future population growth, a demise in the City's (particularly smaller) centres and urban sprawl. The changes promote high quality urban design outcomes and strive to make the city's centres stronger and more vibrant by encouraging a range of mixed uses, including residential activities. Not only that, good on the Council for having the guts to focus future growth and development around key nodes, such as Johnsonville and Kilbirnie, which are on Council's 'growth spine', accessible to good public transport options. If only Auckland, Christchurch and Hamilton cities had taken similiar initiatives earlier and been proactive in planning their cities they wouldn't have the urban sprawl issues now facing them! I know which city I'd rather be living in - a compact, vibrant and walkable one!
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below