Member log in

Slingshot braces for all-you-can-eat launch this afternoon

With 1000 customers pre-registered, the ISP is set to reveal more plan details.

As flagged by NBR on Monday, Slingshot is set to launch its $79.95 a month unlimited data plan today.

RELATED:
Vodafone's naked DSL delayed by technical glitch
How the other half lives: iiNet unveils 1TB plan in Australia (CNET)

Last night, CallPlus/Slingshot chief executive Mark Callander told NBR his company was aiming to go live with its All You Can Eat plan late this afternoon.

Some 1000 customers had pre-registered for the plan, Mr Callander said.

There will initially be a limit of 10,000 customers on the plan, although the Slingshot boss hopes to lift this after a trial period.

Other qualifiers: a customer must sign up to a 24-month plan and have their tolls and home phone accounts with Slingshot too.

Following the recent demise of the only other nationwide unlimited data plan – Telecom’s Big Time – Mr Callander sees a potential pool of 100,000 “power user” customers for un-capped broadband.

Mr Callander sees sufficient demand for the remaining 9000 initial customer accounts to be such that some accounts might end up on TradeMe.

Customers can expect best performance in areas where CallPlus/Slingshot or its LLU allies (Vodafone, Orcon and Compass) has unbundled Telecom exchanges.

That means, for now, primarily Auckland and Hamilton - although CallPlus/Slingshot is on track to unbundle 28 exchanges around the country over the next three months (see Keallhauled).

In other areas, customers will be on Telecom UBA network, which Mr Callander sees as inferior because of Telecom’s “dimensioning” or restrictions on bandwidth per subscriber.

Traffic will not be shaped or “throttled” as Telecom did with its Big Time plan during peak hours, and customers will be free to access peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing services.

But at congested times, traffic will be prioritised in the following order:
1) VoIP (internet voice call) traffic, gaming, local browsing
2) Streaming
3) Email
4) Exceptions (traffic types that are unknown)
5) P2P and other file sharing technologies

“If you are a power user within this plan, we will not single you out and slow you down,” Mr Callander said. “There is no abuse pool and no targeted throttling of high volume users. We believe this is against the nature of All You Can Eat.”

All You Can Eat customers have “more than three to four times” the international bandwidth allocation per subscriber compared to Slingshot’s limited plans.

“The logic behind this is straightforward - we expect All You Can Eat customers to be power users and this means significantly longer times online - perhaps even always on. As a result, the bandwidth allocated to this pool needs to be considerably more.”

All You Can Eat customers will also see the benefits of local caching, said Mr Callander.

The Slingshot boss also told NBR the unlimited data plans would be profitable from the get-go. "I don't know what went wrong for Telecom [with Go Large and Big Time]", Mr Callander said.

All eyes are now on CallPlus/Slingshot’s most direct rivals, Vodafone and Orcon.

Orcon has yet to return a request for comment.

A Vodafone spokesman said his company was currently focused on its naked DSL offering, announced earlier this week.

More by Chris Keall

Comments and questions
15

"Traffic will not be shaped or “throttled” as Telecom did with its Big Time plan "
"But at congested times, traffic will be prioritised"

Potato, Potato!

If somethings congested all the time (as all you can eat plans are) its exactly the same thing.

[Some people will have a similar reaction. But good on Callplus/Slingshot for being upfront about the fact they do prioritise, and how - CK]

Why is it such extremes in the NZ broadband market, why instead of opening yourself up to all sorts of trouble on an unlimited plan, not offer a reasonably priced say 80-100gb plan - Instead you have all the main players offering 20-30gb for $80 which is a rip and then unlimited to $80 which is prob to generous why is it so hard to have middle ground - a 50gb for $50 bucks plan, better for the consumer and better for the business as easier to manage than a unlimited one

I agree with the 100-200gb plan at say $80 then you can either charge per GB after that or make it dialup speed.
i can see bad things in the long run for both party's here.
pitty you need a phone line with slingshot to get this plan.

It sounds good to me, for the people wanting a cheaper plan, then Slingshot still has there other plans with free off peak data, which means you can get 100GB of data for $50

I'm still undecided if I will take the offer as I'm not a heavy uses get all I want to now and would just be paying more for the same.

This off will definitely make Slingshot/CallPlus NZs #3 ISP

In my case I pay Orcon for the pleasure of downloading additional gigabytes - and they STILL throttle my traffic.

This makes me really, really cross as I don't expect "something for nothing" - I pay a premium for a basic (capped) service and I am happy to pay a marginal cost for additional usage - but I get really cheesed off that they *still* insist on throttling me - even though I'm paying for the privilege!

However, I'm not shifting because I would prefer not to have a 24-month term. More of these LLU-enabled providers should compete head-on with Orcon on their "no minimum term" strategy - I would migrate in a split-second.

What percentage of them are using all this bandwidth for legitimate purposes? I imagine a large proportion are torrenting copyright protected material 24/7 - aka pirates/freetards. Thinking this is not the case is wishful thinking. Slingshot must know this.

If I was them I would make one of the T&C's of the plan that you will be under more scrutiny with regards to investigating copyright violations, perhaps via random DPI checks or the like.

Or perhaps a cynic might think this is merely a honey pot (perhaps subsidied by copyright protection organisations) designed to get all the pirates into a nice little package ready for takedown.

As a user who has recently had their Telecom "Bit Time" plan discontinued I was keen to know more when I head that Slingshot was going to offer something similar. Then I head that it comes with a 24 month cotnract.

I agree with Mike NZ, why are there no plans for the 'middle' of the market?

... sounds good but locking into a 24 month term seems to be a hefty burden. Given recent market activity it looks promising but also given the changes in the market place that may occur over the next 2 years, what looks enticing now may not be so later in the term.

With the Government about to announce the LFC (local fibre company) to deploy it's ultra fast broadband. We could easily start to see major changes within 24 months. This will surely affect the market with future plans and data allowances from the telco’s. I would suggest to wait just a little longer before signing up to any new plans.

Wait a little longer???

I am on a 20 gb plan with telecom now and it is costing me $60

WHAT A COMPLETE RIP!

@unConscious

Suck on my torrenting ass

Good luck with your torrents chief. They're throttling them. They have even admitted to it.

Http download @ 40kb/s torrents @4kb/s. Orcon downloaded up to 2.7MB/s. They won't log a ticket also claiming the its problem with exchange when it wasn't like that before we switched.

I have found the plan rather slow - I lag out of Starcraft 2 now, with Vodafone this never happened. In addition, I've found them very hard to deal with. And rude, and sneaky.

I was so disgusted with the “service” I received that I made this site: A Slingshot Customer’s Experience – http://slingshot.org.nz/.

The sad thing is that this is the third time my family has had a Slingshot account – before now we loved them.

Slow broadband and awful service.

Yeah they restrict my unlimited way to much!
Im trying to download legit music the artist gave me a sendspace link for and it starts at 1.0kbps then slows down and fails!
They shape way to hard during peak times!