Member log in

South Canterbury Finance to make further provisions

A capital raising is imminent for Allan Hubbard's troubled South Canterbury Finance with the company today admitting further provisioning is required for impaired assets.

In a market update, South Canterbury said it will report a loss for the six months to December due in part to provisioning for assets previously identified as impaired.

“In addition, the early redemption of derivative instruments associated with the US private placement facility and the impact of fair value adjustments on investments will have a negative impact on results for the half year.”

The company also said that it had discovered adjustments might be required to the reporting of certain items in the June 30, 2009 audited financial statements.

For instance, the valuation used for a preference share investment in South Island Farm Holdings should have been at fair value rather than cost, under the applicable financial reporting standard.

The company’s latest prospectus revealed a July purchase of $74 million of preference and ordinary shares in South Island Farm Holdings, a company formed in March by Hubbard and owner of 20 dairy farms.

An independent valuation of that deal is being undertaken.

“The company is currently reviewing the extent of potential prior period adjustments and at this stage believes that they may not have material impact on the current position of the company,” South Canterbury said.

The company recently replaced its auditor – Woodnorth Myers – with the larger and more experienced Ernst & Young.

Principal owner Mr Hubbard has already been forced to inject funds and underwrite bad loans after South Canterbury posted a net loss of $69 million in the year through June and was forced to renegotiate repayment terms with a group of US investors after it lost its investment grade credit rating.

Mr Hubbard then brought his finance, helicopter and apple export companies (Scales Group) under a new umbrella, Southbury Corporation, and completed a $27.5 million private placement to inject capital into South Canterbury.


New South Canterbury chief executive Sandy Maier has reviewed the business since his appointment just before Christmas.

“The results for the first six months of the year will not be representative of the historical achievements of the company’s business nor of the strength of its future performance,” he said in a statement.

South Canterbury has applied for acceptance into the extended Crown retail deposit scheme, which commences on October 12, 2010.

Until now most of the talk from the company about its recapitalisation plans centred on its major shareholder Southbury Group, which was slated as a sharemarket listing candidate.

But today it appears South Canterbury is headed for a more direct capital raising proposal that could see the finance company bringing in new investors and perhaps a sharemarket float.

Investment bank Forsyth Barr has now been “mandated to source funding to strengthen the balance sheet of South Canterbury Finance.”

On a brighter note, South Canterbury said it has experienced a strong inflow of new investment money, averaging in excess of $1.7 million per day through January.

The company expects to report its half year result later this month or early in March.

More by Duncan Bridgeman

Signup to free NBR email alerts here

Comments and questions
4

well here we go again. More plans and promises, but slow progress really. Any surprises? No, nothing. I don't think anyone expected they would report profits.

I still reckon they'll spin off Scales and Helicopters NZ and use the funds to keep SCF going. I still doubt there is enough demand to float them any time soon. If SCF keeps going like this, eventually their troubles will be behind them, but it that will take another year or two.

I believe the new CEO is being up front and honest and as a person of interest I understand he has his hands on the problems. Investors should just stay in for the long term, as if they all bail out, this will be the biggest crash of my lifetime, and Govt guaranteed, so effect will be all us real NZers who happen to be live in Auckland will bail out our "Mainlander" cousins who live in Sth Island - No Way. I am NOT a Financial Adviser, the opposite in fact. Do not rely upon my personal opinion whatsoecer.

No problem AK - we wont rely on your personal opinion whatsoecer.

Here on the Mainland I think you'll find we dont need any JAFA money...

AK, that's quite funny you say that 'it will be the biggest crash in my lifetime', because, only 21 years ago, NZ's seventh largest financial institution, DFC, with 2.9 billion in assets (back then a much larger share of the financial sector) crashed. And guess who was appointed as statutory manager? Sandy Maier! (see http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/research/bulletin/1987_1991/1991mar54_1brash05mar.pdf )

And it is good to see that a) the government was willing to close down a major failed financial institution and b) the government was willing to leave the losses with creditors and shareholders and c) the government was willing to see state owned enterprises closed down and their creditors take losses. Those were the good old days when the government had some balls and was willing to take difficult decisions. These days the government wrings its hands about problems that hardly exist, and rescues financial institutions that don't even need rescuing, and protects creditors from losses even on the most foolhardy investments.

In another 20 years time, when there is another financial crisis, don't you think the banks and the investors will expect the government to bail them out, and will have taken much worse risks than this time? and won't the pressure on the government to bail them out be all the stronger? Next time it may be the major banks that need to be resolved. Michael Cullen was warned about this on Friday 10 Oct 2008 by combined Treasury and RBNZ advice:
'Offering a guarantee would enduringly change expectations about government responses to financial stresses and institutional failures in the future'
They also advised 'we are not recommending implementation of such a scheme' and that market conditions do not warrant such an initiative.

Dr Cullen apparently did not want to let good advice get in the way of a bad scheme, so he worked all weekend and introduced the scheme on Sunday 12th Oct 2008. (see http://www.lostsoulblog.com/2009/11/more-evidence-nz-big-banks-had-ample.html )

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>