Sparks fly in Dotcom spy drama

Kim Dotcom

Free audio stream, including stories that are padlocked on our site. Listen on any device, anywhere. Updated twice daily. The audio stream takes several seconds to start on Android devices.

Launch Radio player

Sparks flew today as lawyers and a judge clashed over what police and spies did, or didn't do, around last year's Kim Dotcom mansion raid.

The Crown was in the Court of Appeal attempting to overturn a High Court ruling requiring the top-secret Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) to reveal secret details of their surveillance of accused internet piracy mogul Mr Dotcom.

Crown lawyer David Boldt's assertion the GCSB had nothing to do with the much-publicised dawn raid by armed police was rejected by Dotcom lawyer Willie Akel.

Mr Akel asserted the GCSB was fully involved in the search warrant, to which Mr Boldt claimed the spy bureau had nothing to do with the original search warrant.

Mr Boldt claimed the GCSB information was "very limited. It yielded virtually nothing – it was just bland background information".

Mr Akel’s attempts to be granted disclosure of information provided by the GCSB to the police relating to the investigation appeared fell on deaf ears as he addressed Justices Mark O’Regan, Terence Arnold and Rhys Harrison.

In a heated exchange, Justice O’Regan questioned why Mr Akel had filed for full disclosure when all he wanted to know was the length of surveillance and to whom the disclosure was made.

“What we’ve been told by the Crown is we’re having a major delay and a major problem because a whole lot of secure information is having to be disclosed, which means the security council is involved and so forth," Justice O'Regan said.

“If the only relevant matters are how long was the surveillance for and who was the disclosure to, why are you asking for disclosure for the entire file, when you know that’s going to delay the proceedings by some time,” he said.

“It won’t delay the proceedings,” Mr Akel retorted.

“Why have you asked for it, that is the question. If you say it’s not necessary why are you asking for it?" Justice O'Regan asked.

“We considerate it is necessary,” replied Mr Akel.

Chief High Court Justice Helen Winkelmann’s decision in December not only allowed the GCSB to be included as a defendant in Dotcom’s case, it also allowed Dotcom to seek damages from both the police and the GCSB.

Mr Boldt earlier asked the court to look at whether it was even appropriate to combine a judicial review with a damages claim.

"If the damages claim doesn't disrupt, slow down or complicate the review, it might be okay," Mr Boldt said.

The Crown was still anxious to appeal last June's ruling that the raid on Dotcom's Coatesville mansion was unlawful, but had not yet had time to do so, he said.

The appeal is continuing.

bcunningham@nbr.co.nz


9 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

Post Comment

9 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Sounds like the Crown has finally got a sympathetic bench in Justices Mark O’Regan, Terence Arnold and Rhys Harrison.

Sympathy towards the govt misdeeds by the courts is not a new phenomena by any means, though.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Lets hope we finally do have a 'sympathetic bench'...in the inimitable words of Lance Corporal Jones, "they don't like it up 'em"

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Its the old boy network vs the girl. Guess who will win..??

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

These 3x justices have a real problem. This case is not the only trial taking place but also their own public credibility is on the line. The privileged few don't like the media and public watching them.
Bring back the privy council.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Agreed, and if my understanding of a Radio NZ report Dotcom's lawyer told the bench the spy agency, having been economical with the truth perhaps by implication, had still not revealed all relevant facts and may therefore present perjured evidence, hence the request for all of their files. Should the court rule in favour of the spy agency without credible evidence that the agency is telling the whole truth the court itself will become discredited in the public's perception and start the slide down a slippery slope.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Will go a step further (SC) regardless of the result.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

The Crooked Crown IS discredited, but why are govt officials who are breaching the public trust not criminally charged when their offences are far more significant and serious than anything Dotcom or the Tuhoe people ever did?
As bogus as NZ's 'green' myth, the corruption myth, has not been exploded because the Crown evidently refuses to prosecute wrongdoings by its personnel.
That is called 'perverting the course of justice'.
If Grant Wormald had been charged and dismissed for his criminal activities on behalf of the Crown in the Tuhoe raids he would not have been in a position to commit further crimes against Dotcom and who knows else.
But, of course, the dumbed-down 'masses' of NZ believe the Crown's lies and there appears to be zero accountability...

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Our so-called justice system is already damaged by judges' poor performance.
Chief Justice should spend her time looking after her own area.
liberte

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Too much damage has already been done to New Zealand by political and police bumbling in the Dotcom case.
Would those in power please desist from doing even more damage.
WG

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.7119 -0.0067 -0.93%
AUD 0.9306 -0.0083 -0.88%
EUR 0.6490 -0.0067 -1.02%
GBP 0.4666 -0.0024 -0.51%
HKD 5.5207 -0.0521 -0.93%
JPY 88.2130 -0.7720 -0.87%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1188.0 0.200 2015-05-28T00:
Oil Brent 63.2 -1.210 2015-05-28T00:
Oil Nymex 57.7 0.120 2015-05-28T00:
Silver Index 16.6 0.022 2015-05-28T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5777.6 5844.9 5777.6 1.17%
NASDAQ 5096.3 5106.6 5106.6 -0.17%
DAX 11685.7 11704.4 11677.6 -1.06%
DJI 18154.1 18154.1 18126.1 0.00%
FTSE 7040.9 7069.9 7040.9 0.01%
HKSE 27398.3 27604.3 27454.3 -0.11%
NI225 20510.3 20636.4 20551.5 0.06%