Supreme Court finds Trinity scheme was tax avoidance

Free audio stream, including stories that are padlocked on our site. Listen on any device, anywhere. Updated twice daily. The audio stream takes several seconds to start on Android devices.

Launch Radio player

In a majority decision the Supreme Court has dismissed appeals brought by investors in the Trinity tax avoidance case more than 11 years after the forestry scheme was first designed.

Both the High Court and Court of Appeal had previously ruled the scheme was tax avoidance.

Inland Revenue has said the case involved potential tax losses of about $3.7 billion.

Investors in Trinity bought a 50-year licence to grow Douglas fir trees on land owned by the Trinity Foundation companies and agreed to pay a licence fee of $2 million a hectare in 2047 when the trees were harvested.

Investors depreciated the $2 million a hectare fee, and deducted the cost of an insurance policy with a British Virgin Islands-based company.

Justices Andrew Tipping, John McGrath and Thomas Gault found that although the claimed deductions complied with the ordinary specific provisions in income tax legislation under which they were claimed, the Trinity scheme involved tax avoidance arrangements which were void under the legislation.

The claims for allowances were disallowed.

In a separate decision Chief Justice Sian Elias and Justice Noel Anderson agreed the deductions must be disallowed on the basis that they were part of a wider tax avoidance arrangement.

The two justices noted however that they had reservations on thE aspects of the reasoning of the majority.

The court upheld penalties which include repaying the tax, plus pay interest on that money and 100 per cent shortfall penalties.

Costs of $75,000 were awarded to the Commissioner of Inland Revenue.


2 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

2 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Anyone that thinks they can deprecate $2 million a hectare fee and not have it considered avoidance is optimistic to say the least.
That amount is fantasy as far as the real world is concerned.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

This decision wont be good news for Westpac and the other banks with their upcoming $3 Billion
"structured finance" tax avoidance cases.

Reply
Share
  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.6590 0.0024 0.37%
AUD 0.8881 -0.0148 -1.64%
EUR 0.6012 0.0016 0.27%
GBP 0.4220 0.0009 0.21%
HKD 5.1099 0.0192 0.38%
JPY 81.6810 0.3120 0.38%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1089.2 -5.700 2015-08-03T00:
Oil Brent 50.2 -2.020 2015-08-03T00:
Oil Nymex 45.2 -1.860 2015-08-03T00:
Silver Index 14.5 -0.230 2015-08-03T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5957.9 5957.9 5957.9 -0.40%
NASDAQ 5111.0 5125.9 5115.4 -0.06%
DAX 11408.2 11476.9 11443.7 0.11%
DJI 17596.9 17635.8 17598.2 -0.03%
FTSE 6688.6 6715.5 6688.6 -0.03%
HKSE 24364.4 24519.3 24411.4 -0.02%
NI225 20462.2 20552.0 20548.1 -0.14%