Taskforce ideas are mainstream, says Business NZ
The recommendations in The 2025 Taskforce report released today are mainstream economics and are consistent with what the business community advocates, said Business New Zealand.
The report, headed by former National Party leader Don Brash, recommends cutting government spending to fund tax cuts.
"Business NZ endorses the taskforce's call for a cap on government spending, moves towards an overall top tax rate of 20 percent, and the establishment of a Regulatory Responsibility Act.
"These three moves alone would turbo charge the economy," said Business NZ chief executive Phil O'Reilly.
T he report showed a comprehensive grasp of the factors that could propel New Zealand's economy into higher growth.
Its strength was the focus on government spending, Mr O'Reilly said. There was an overwhelming need for the Government to improve the quality of its spending, he said.
"Not just by encouraging restraint by government agencies, but by transforming its approach to regulation, tax and government services."
The establishment of a Productivity Commission, better protection of property rights and better quality decisions around education and other services would have a significant impact.
"These kinds of policies if executed properly could enhance the capacity to work and the rewards from work for all New Zealanders.
Business hoped that the report's recommendations would be widely discussed by all parties in good faith and without ideological preconceptions.
Recommendations include:
* Replacing the top tax rate of 38 cents in the dollar and business rate of 30 cents in the dollar with a top tax rate of between 20 and 25 percent;
* Limitations on some universal benefits. Those included interest-free student loans and subsidies for early childhood care education;
* The Government to reduce operational spending to 29 percent of gross domestic product by 2012-13;
* Use the NZ Superannuation Fund to pay back borrowing and change the age of entitlement;
* Impose congestion charges in cities to pay for roads;
* No capital gains tax.
The taskforce was set up as part of a support agreement with the ACT Party which has a key policy plank of a flat tax and takes its name from the year that New Zealand aims to catch up with Australia.
Signup to free NBR email alerts here
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit















Comments and questions8
this report is brilliant. at last an economic lifeline!
brilliant report
let's hope government acts on it
otherwise we will continue to slide down!
now up to key & hide to take action!
hope we are not disappointed!
Listen to all you right wing supporters. You hear tax cuts and jump on the band wagon. Now don't get me wrong I agree drastic reform is needed but cutting taxes as much as is recommended, I don't think that is the yway to go. Something will have to give. I dread to think what that something would be, health, education, who knows.
Australia......my children received completely free medical. We received Family assistance for the first time - didn't receive any help from NZ govt even though my husband earn't a poultry $40000. This was just before the previous government introduced family tax credits here. My husbands income increased to $75000 plus overtime, plus 1 day off a month to spend with the family, plus 9% super, plus redundancy fund contributions plus 10 sick days per year! Anyone wanting a better family life.......pack your bags.
Yes, we do need to reduce the bureaucracy, but ideological "cut government" approaches are not going to get us aligned as a society. Flat taxes are simply wrong when some people earn 50 or more times what someone else earns for the same hours of effort. How much cash do you really need in a year? why not focus on what we want rather than what we don't want? I want educated people, with income and leisure time widely shared. This is what makes a good community, not some working damn hard, some not working at all, and others excluded entirely. There is simply too much focus on the money in our society.
When I see anyone promoting congestion tax then I read it as being a politician greedy with an opportunity to gain tax income without a public outcry. Which makes it as principled as the fart tax.
The problem is that our congestion is on the motorways not in the inner cities.
What passes for "mainsteam" economics may be what is not needed. It takes more than a Masters degree in metrics dominated "economics" to make an economist who can think originally in positive terms founded on sound methodology, rather than the normative thinking that appears to dominate the thinking of so-called mainsteam media quoted "economists" taking in each others washing. Suggested start for finding out what this means; try Milton Friedmans', "The Methodology of Positive Economics".
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below