Taskforce slams Fonterra’s structure
Massive changes to dairy giant Fonterra’s capital structure has been recommended by the 2025 Taskforce led by Don Brash.
The taskforce’s report out today specifically names Fonterra and criticises its co-operative model as under performing – likely making taskforce leader Don Brash dairy farmers’ enemy number one.
It suggested the government should take a hands on approach.
“Fonterra’s performance matters for New Zealand and in view of parliament’s role in the creation of Fonterra, the government has a legitmate strong interest in the future structure of the company in a way that it would not if a more competitive model had been adopted earlier.”
Outside capital should be allowed in the door of New Zealand’s biggest company, and the government should kept up pressure to encourage it, the taskforce recommended.
In the report, the taskforce recognised that Fonterra exists in its current dominant position because of exceptions granted to the Commerce Act to allow it to form.
“As with so many state-sponsored or facilitated businesses, Fonterra has not lived up to the promise sold to New Zealanders when it was allowed to form,” the report stated.
“We do no believe that in its present co-operative structure it can do so, and we believe it is important for the long-term health of the dairy industry in New Zealand, and hence for farmer shareholders, that a transition to a conventional corporate form with outside traded capital occurs expeditiously.”
Two years ago, the Fonterra board shredded plans to put a recommendation to shareholders that the company partially list on the stock exchange.
Fonterra chairman Sir Henry van der Heyden then led the co-operative’s board to come up with a new plan to encourage further shareholder investment by increasing the share base with restricted trade among farmers. The first stage of this process was agreed to by farmers this month.
The taskforce said that while the choice was in the hands of farmers, the government needed to put pressure on to change.
“No consideration of accommodation for Fonterra on any other front should be countenanced until the transformation of the company is irreversibly underway.”
The 2025 Taskforce was created to look at ways to reduce the income gap between New Zealand and Australia by 2025.
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit















Comments and questions6
The comments by the taskforce make them sound like the little boy whose playmates don't want to play with him. Cooperatives exist to serve their members' needs. It's no accident that while almost everyone knows the milk price how many know how much profit Fonterra makes? Very few. It's just not an important figure. If they let financial investors in, there will be a huge battle every year between farmers wanting a high price for their milk and investors wanting a higher return for their money which means a low price for milk. Commercial success, let's face it, has nothing at all to do with capital structure, it's all about how well the business is managed and governed. Fonterra is doing really well right now and so are the farmers -- would-be investors are simply making up stories because they want a piece of the action.
Once Fonterra requested and received Government assistance (in the form of special legislation), every NZ citizen had a legitimate interest in the company and the company ceased to exist solely for its members. Time for farmers to grow up!
Wonderful idea! Sell off Fonterra to some overseas venture capitalists. They will run it so much more efficiently than New Zealanders, and we will all benefit. They might even share some of the profits. The 'trickle down' effort has been so beneficial to New Zealand in the past.
If coops are so unsuccessful and farmers not that commercialy astute, then how was Fonterra built in the first place? Why is the estimated capital value of Fonterra 60% higher than Telecom? Indeed both Fonterra and the three Foodstuffs combined are streets ahead of leading shares on the NZX. I fail to see how New Zealand's productivity would be improved by having Fonterra owned by US fund managers. If it was I can foresee one day in the future, my grandchildren (who would be living in Aus by then), asking 'was Fonterra once a NZ company?'
Let it be re-stated in this blog that Dr Brash has an interest in a high-profile dairy venture (NZ Milk Co) with Keith Turner. My take is that the venture is struggling to get farmers on board. Perhaps, Dr Brash should put a disclaimer before making this comment about Fonterra's capital structure.
Don, please don't put the future of the jewel in our nation's economic crown in the hands of foreign bankers who borrowed against its future earnings to buy it and then sell off the assets to get their capital gain. The current owners have reinvested profits for future growth. Can you point to any NZ listed companies who have done it better?
If you think the Cooperative model is so bad, have a look at Ocean Spray. These bog dwelling US farmers made a global brand out of cranberry juice - which is unpalatable stuff lets face it!
I quote from their website for you Don:
Ocean Spray is a cooperative owned by more than 600 cranberry growers across North America and Canada and over 100 Florida grapefruit growers. It employs more than 2,000 people worldwide and is run from a headquarters surrounded by cranberry bogs in Lakeville-Middleboro, Massachusetts.
If you refuse to learn from the success of Fonterra, maybe you can learn from the American Cranberry farmer.
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below