The timing is (cough) not ideal, but Telecom has confirmed today that it will bid to participate in the government’s $1.5 billion fibre-to-the-home project, placing both compliant and non-compliant proposals before the minister.
Bids close for the project today (see other contenders below).
The state-owned Crown Fibre Holdings will now sift through an unknown number of proposals from potential investment partners in up to 33 public-private Local Fibre Companies.
The government has set no time-frame for picking winners.
Restraints on Telecom
The terms of the ultrafast broadband project forbid a telco with both wholesale and retail operations (that is, Telecom, Vodafone or TelstraClear) from holding a majority stake in a Local Fibre Company.
It is thus unclear how Telecom could bid without a concomitant proposal to spin off its Chorus division - something chief executive Paul Reynolds has repeatedly opposed.
And, until Crown Fibre Holdings and its minister, Steven Joyce, has mulled Telecom’s confidential bids, it seems we’re unlikely to find out.
In a brief statement offering few hard details, Telecom says its alternative bid will contain a proposal to build on Chorus division’s roadside fibre cabinet rollout, which is already underway (bringing fibre to neighbourhoods and many streets, if not to the curb or door).
Telecom’s statement (in full, below) also indicates sees a roll for itself in interconnecting the up to 33 local fibre companies around New Zealand. The skills and accomplishments of Chorus are highlighted - as they were when the company made its previous twin alternative proposal to Mr Joyce - both of which involved Chorus taking charge of a single national network.
It indicates Telecom is ready to work with other wholesale and retail players, but does not specify whether the company itself has bid to invest in one or more of the 33 proposed local fibre company areas.
Other contenders
Lines company Vector has already confirmed it will bid for Auckland, and TeamTalk (owner of the capital's CityLink fibre loop) that it will pitch for the Wellington Local Fibre Company.
And while Vector may well go it alone (the company was also mulling a shared bid for Wellington last time NBR touched base), a number of other lines and power companies in the Regional Fibre Group are expected to bid for regions as consortia.
As predicted in the December 4 issue of NBR, Waikato’s WEL Networks has teamed with Hamilton fibre optic network provider Velocity.
The pair are joined by Waipa Networks and Hamilton Fibre Network in a bid for the Waikato Local Fibre Company.
Telecom (NZX: TEL) shares were down two cents to $2.38 in mid-morning trading.
RAW DATA: Telecom's statement:
Telecom will today submit its response to the Invitation to Participate in providing Ultra-Fast Broadband (UFB) for New Zealand. Telecom will provide a fully compliant Preferred Commercial Model proposal, and an Alternative Commercial Model proposal. The alternative proposal focuses on delivering a national network using Telecom’s fibre-to-the-node (FTTN) programme as the logical springboard for the Government’s vision of fibre-to-the-home (FTTH).
“Telecom will submit a powerful proposition that will ensure the fast delivery of a national fibre network with none of the Government’s money being wasted through duplicating what is already built,” said Paul Reynolds, CEO, Telecom. “It makes the maximum use of the fibre already in the ground, assures high quality and guaranteed delivery, and the absolute minimum of waste.
“Also, a national approach ensures individual regions benefit from a consistently engineered and interconnected network. Quality and flexibility are at the core of the network we propose to build. The network will last well into the future and be flexible enough to adapt – at minimal cost - to customer demand and new technologies as they emerge.
“Telecom’s access network business, Chorus, has many years of experience and a superior engineering skill and knowledge base. The Chorus-led FTTN project is an ongoing example of our decades of experience in building and operating national infrastructure. This project already extends the fibre footprint beyond the business districts of every city to include the majority of small businesses and within two kilometres of most residential homes. Building the FTTN network is a public and legally binding commitment which we have honoured by meeting all milestones.
“We have designed our proposal from the ground up to meet the needs of all access seekers. This is because we understand that it will not just be Telecom, but also other wholesalers and retailers, who will drive the demand for fibre to the home. Make no mistake; this will be a future-proofed, built to international standards, ‘open to all comers’ network,” he said.
“In addition to the two proposals Telecom is submitting, Telecom is open to discussing other alternative proposals which achieve the Government’s objective, avoid unnecessary waste and align the incentives and investment plans of both the Government and Telecom,” said Paul Reynolds.
Comments
leave telecom to get on with it
the issue with all this nonsense is that National are trying to enact a Labour policy that is idealogically conceived. Private sectors dont owe a duty to share toys, and deliver the governments FTTN to the public at large, they owe an intrinsic care to ensure contractual obligations are met.
If the need can be proven to be real, and not coming from the same stable that bought us save the world from globalisation, capitalisim, earth warming and now infrastructure projects ( to prime the economy) then the government should leave telecom alone and build its own competeing effort - just like Jim Anderton has done with Kiwi Bank.
They will realise in very short order that the cold steel of commercialism is a strange bed fellow. Customers whilst whinging about speed , price and service are not prepared to pay anything like a marginal cost for improved service.
one can see the unease with which shareholders at telecom are taking the situation, and the lack of employment that has occured. New graduates wanting a career in Telecommunication are out of luck for at least 5 years as they are not hiring. Why would you when all you are doing is replicating structures.
thus far structural separation, all the talk about fibre and the like has been a yawnfest, with lots of wasted investment and no return. number portability was a severe waste of money.
this stuff is not hard, but thinking the power sector utility folk are a panacea are misguided , they only know monopoloistic pricing, where the price goes one way.
we don't need fibre in the street
we need fibre from here to Australia and here to the US. Build a submarine cable first, then the local demand will rise and finally beat out the service offered by xDSL2+ and then there will be enough of a business case to roll out fibre to the curb.
as it stands this is a pipe dream designed to force Telecom to structurally separate and it's not going to work.
does anyone really think 33 regional Telecoms is a good idea?
Bring it on
All this talk of 'telcos' misses the point.
Dark fibre is core national infrastructure like roads.
We only need one 'open access' network not the current investment and overbuilds on profitable routes.
We need it to be pushed as far out as it can go into the rural sector and we need to mandate its use by the govt to massively lower their cost of service delivery.
The market will compete when the ridiculous costs of vertical integration remove competitive barriers to entry.
yes we do need better international links too!
We won't see 33 regional Telecoms (my pick 12 at most) and they will just be 'lines companies' who will really only be visible to retailers.
This is not Labours old policy but one that will create many real innovative 'capitalist' opportunities.
I know the benefits of fibre, I've had it in my business for the last decade! and my home for the last year!
Telecom and Fibre
I would give Telecom a wide berth when it comes to laying their hands on government owned infrastructure. One only has to look at the latest gigantic balls up with the XT network to know they are grossly incompetent. World class mobile network. Yeah right.
Post new comment