Member log in

There could be life on Mars – Kiwi academic as Nasa rover lands

Aug 11. Nas has begun to publish the first colour photos sent back by Curiousity and the  Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.

Here's a selection.

For more, see www.nasa.gov.

Gale Crater panorama. Click to zoom.

Blast marks left by Curiosity.

The mountainous rim of the crater in the distance.


Aug 7: Nasa's $3 billion Curiosity rover has touched down on Mars (see http://www.nasa.gov).

The rover, which landed shortly after 5.30pm NZ time yesterday, will search for traces of so-called extremophile lifeforms.

It immediately began to transmit images (right) albeit tiny 64x64 pixel black and white format.

Professor Craig Cary of Waikato University studies life in extreme environments like the Dry Valleys of Antarctica, widely considered to have the most Mars-like conditions of any place on Earth. He comments:

"The possibility of finding life is absolutely there. For life, you need water, and you need a source of energy. The problem on Mars is the availability of water.

"All life forms need water, but the question is: at what level? We know there are organisms that can live in ice, for example, because ice has a tendency to create little channels that remain liquid even though the rest of the ice is frozen.

"Antarctic researchers have found bacteria that are hundreds of thousands of years old, dormant but still alive, in these channels. So if there's permafrost or ice underground, it's a possibility.

"The problem with Mars is that it's a big planet. You can't pick a location that you can be absolutely certain is the right place to go looking – it's a gamble." 

Curiosity handed in the 3.8 billion-year-old Gale Crater near the planet's equator, an area rich in minerals that form in the presence of water.

From golf cart to Mini Cooper
The biggest technical differences between Curiosity and previous Nasa Mars rovers is its sheer size.

"Curiosity is huge in comparison. Spirit and Opportunity were maybe the size of a golf cart, Curiosity is the size of a Mini Cooper, weighs 900kg, is twice as long, five times as heavy and produces about three times as much power," says Dr Allan McInnes, Senior Lecturer, University of Canterbury School of Electrical and Computer Engineering.

Dr McInnes was a systems engineer working on the Mars rover programme from 2000-03 and worked on the Spirit and Opportunity rovers. 

"Curiosity is specifically designed to answer some of the questions that will help with future manned Mars missions," he says.

"One of the primary mission goals is to make an extensive study of surface radiation levels and really understand what's going on there. If you are going to put people on Mars, you want to make sure they will not be exposed to extreme radiation."

The six-wheel, nuclear-powered Curiosity is expected to operate for around two years, using lasers and drills. With its plutonium fuel source, the rover could potentially work for decades.

Comments and questions
26

aliens guy

Is there life in Huntly?

Is there no limit to mans inventiveness and ingenuity? To witness Nasa's internet feed of this very special landing and watch another small step to mankind pursuing our true destiny puts so much in perspective.

Half of mars missions have crashed so pretty clear limits to ingenuity

I'd be surprised if even half of the landings have not crashed. Even if half have crashed doesn't it show what a challenge it is and, by definition, how much ingenuity has to go into the successful missions?

For the record, a Maori space waka landed there on the 3rd April,1745. Mars belongs to them; specifically, Arawa Tribe.

if there is water on mars who will own the rights to it?

seeing as how they were first, looks like the Yanks own all rights. And don't be giving me any of the old "we don't know who was there first shyte" Good old USA were there first, same as on the moon, I hope they (USA) claim that to, they did plant a flag, so according to the rules of colonisation the moon is American.

It's 10% bigger now.

why ruin another planet. we already ruined mother earth..

Because if mankind doesn't go interplanetary, eventually we will die out. Which would probably suit the Greens - and Anonymous .....

Whoa!! I'm reading an article in the future, its like Aug 6, 2012 and the article creation is Aug 7, 2012 lol okay, nothing to do with the article. just being hurmous.

Well you're certainly not being humourous

I hope that Curiosity has a flag saying "we come in peace"

Well then who are the Martians?
Maybe 'Curiosity' wil come back to earth and try and make some sense of us!

How would we react if the Martians came boy-racing around our back garden??? Turn Bruce Willis loose on them???

I'm sure there is life on mars - isnt that where the tech editors of stuff and NBR come from?

I see this landing on Mars as no triumph, but more like a casino roulette game that just so happen to be won.

So now, what will be the outcome? More of the same, with more rocket launches and funding for more nuclear-powered spacecraft. As long as humanity supports this kind of activity, a devastating radioactive fallout accident waiting to happen is no longer 'if', it is 'when'. 





So I maintain my position that going to Mars to laser-beam some rocks is an extremely unconscious and self-serving act, on the part of certain people who have a complete disregard for preserving and caring for the fragile balance of life on THIS planet. 



Just imagine what $2.5 billion (which is 2,500 MILLION dollars) would do to start cleaning up the environment! 

What would you do if given one million dollars to make the world a better place to live in? 



Now, multiply that by 2,500 people, who could be given one million dollars each to feed and clothe the hungry, house the homeless, clean up the pollution, and work toward restoring the Earth to its former beauty.

(continued at:)
http://darinselby.1hwy.com/4spaceprogramerrors.html

Bit embarrassing to discover that nuclear may prove to be the single most environmentally friendly mass use energy source invented so far.

what a pathetic, ignorant and sadly short termed view of the world you must have. Yes the landing was very lucky - but other than that you are so far off beam it isn't even remotely funny. For a start the curiosity rover is plutonium powered, not the space vehicle it travelled in.

Expanding humanities knowledge is a selfless act that stands to benefit all of humanity. By learning about the geological principles underpinning Mars formation, testing for extremophiles and moisture in the soil we may actually learn a little more about our own world

Imagine what sort of state humanity would be in if it weren't for NASA. How many people would have been kileld by the lack of reliable weather forecasting or all the advances made possible by solid state technologies developed by NASA. (if you feel this is so evil then please by all means stop using your PC and the Internet as these wouldn't exist without input from NASA)

There is an old old saying. Give someone a fish and you give them one meal. Give them a net and teach them how to fish and you give them a means of survival.

So I will politely disagree with you.

You weren't being polite.

He was overly polite.

A nuclear powered machine on Mars? Next thing we'll hear the Martians have donated the world US$100 trillion so all our problems are fixed. Spend up large!

You can keep all the olympics and other world news currently, this extraordinary landing was the single best event I've heard all year. Mankind is just star dust and the sooner we start exploring and colonising our cosmos the better. It is our destiny.

Spot on. We've been exploring since time began and we ain't NEVER going to stop. So there!!

May the search for intelligent life progress, 'cause there's not an abundance here. And when we don't find anything, shall we at last finally admit creation by a Supreme Being? Probably not because we are mankind.