Free audio stream, including stories that are padlocked on our site. Listen on any device, anywhere. Updated twice daily. The audio stream takes several seconds to start on Android devices.Launch Radio player
BUSINESSDESK: Torchlight Fund No 1 LP, an entity managed by Pyne Gould boss George Kerr, has made the last $3.5 million repayment of a loan that raised the ire of the market watchdog.
The payment of the loan from Pyne Gould's Perpetual Cash Management Fund means the $28 million facility has been fully-repaid before the end of July, as previously indicated. The fund also paid $6 million in accrued management fees to Pyne Gould subsidiary Torchlight (GP) 1, the company said.
Today's payment comes after last week's $9 million repayment, which was funded from the ongoing sale of real estate assets.
Earlier this month the High Court ordered the cash management fund be subject to two independent observers ahead of a substantive court hearing next month.
The order was made after statutory supervisor Trustees Executors passed on concerns about the related party loans to the Financial Markets Authority.
Perpetual Trust disputed the FMA's interpretation of the loan, but asked Torchlight to repay the facility ahead of schedule.
A sister fund managed by Perpetual was frozen after a surge in redemption requests after the details of the Torchlight loan emerged.
Last week Pyne Gould exited its stake in Heartland New Zealand and sold down most of its investment in PGG Wrightson to repay $22 million in bank debt.
The shares were unchanged at 25 cents apiece, about two-thirds of the 37 cents-a-share takeover bid made by Kerr and US hedge fund Baker Street Capital via Australasian Equity Partners No 1 LP.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- Craig Norgate, former Fonterra CEO, dies in UK
- Rangatira buys controlling stake in lab equipment firm Bio-Strategy
- MARKET CLOSE: Shares rise after selloff; Summerset gains on guidance
- On the tragic deaths of a mother and three children – a dissenting view
- Court says building a business isn't part of running a business