Member log in

Auckland’s new housing plan imposes height limits

The new Auckland unitary plan places 99 residential zones from legacy plans into five different residential zones.

It also sets varying height restrictions in different areas (see box). For example, Auckland central will have no restriction, while areas dubbed “metro centres”, such as Henderson, New Lynn and Botany, will have an 18-storey limit.

Auckland residents now have 10 weeks to submit feedback on the plan, launched on Friday, which the council wants to notifiy after August this year.

A design manual will be created to ensure buildings produced under the new plan are of high quality.

The draft unitary plan recommends design statements may be required for areas where design is identified as important, or where there is recognised special character.

However, the Auckland Design Manual, which will give guidance on how to prepare design statements, will not be released until September.

This prompted concern from residents, who will not be able to give feedback on it during the 10-week period.

But Auckland Council regional strategy manager Ree Anderson says what will be enforceable is in the plan.

“The design guide is to help interpret those areas right. So the enforceability for good, quality living is still in the plan.”

Cranleigh Strategic director Martin Udale says he would like to see more possibilities in mixed housing zones.

“I’d like to see that higher, or signalled that it could be, just so people don’t believe they are cut off at two levels.”

Ngati Whatua o Orakei trustee and Auckland Waterfront development board member Ngarimu Blair says there are concerns about arbitrary height rules.

“With eight-metre height restrictions there is the possibility of developers building short, squat, ugly things rather than responding to the place and the environment itself.”

Mr Blair says he hopes the rules might be more flexible so a building can respond to the enviroment it is created in. 

More by Victoria Young for NBR NZ Property Investor

Comments and questions
5

This so called 'Unity Plan' would have to be the most ill-conceived plan of the many that have been presented to Auckland.
For some reason, Auckland electors seem to excel at choosing councillors who have no idea of what a modern city should look like, or how it should function. The rail tunnel is a good example. It goes nowhere near the 'dormitory suburbs' yet is going to cost ratepayers billions, if they are foolish enough to let it get started.
The planned high-rise apartments, etc, are nowhere near any public transport - rail network or potential network - and who (?) was one of the councillors in office when the dead-end rail link was approved for Manukau City, a rail line straight into the side of a large building, no possibility of extending it into a loop.
Auckland has never been able to see the wood for the trees, only the 'kindling for tonight's fire'.

A dollar short & a day late.

Sounds like a bad idea to me. It just makes things unnessessarily complex. And all you'll end up with is a big forest of buildings exactly 18 levels high and it will look stupid!

Why does all this 'growth' have to come to Auckland?

Why is there not a 'national growth strategy'?

Who benefits from all this Auckland 'growth' apart from property developers, speculators and overseas investors?

No National Growth Strategy ? Auckland is the National Growth Strategy.