BUSINESSDESK: Vector's credit rating may come under the gun after the Commerce Commission's draft rules to set the default price-quality paths for gas pipelines would impose a sharp price cut for the Auckland lines company, Moody's Investors Service says.
The lines company's Baa1 credit rating could come under pressure if the final regulatory decisions put too much strain on Vector's financial metrics, Moody's said in a comment yesterday. About 86% of Vector's earnings through the gas and electricity transportation business are at risk of being cut, the rating agency said.
"The proposed reduction in gas transmission and distribution tariffs by 25% and 16%, respectively, will put further downward pressure on Vector's financial profile as it comes after the 8% tariff reduction proposed by the commission for the electricity distribution business in August," Moody's analyst Spencer Ng says.
Vector shares were unchanged at $2.75 yesterday, having shed 5.2% on Wednesday when the gas price path was announced.
The commission is expected to make its final determination on electricity price paths next month and gas tariffs in February.
Earlier this month, Vector chairman Michael Stiassny told shareholders at the company's annual meeting that the commission was imposing price cuts on the lines company using a flawed methodology that risks undermining investment in critical public infrastructure.
"Price cuts as the commission is suggesting, if sustained over the long term, threaten continued investment in our network and therefore the infrastructure to support growth in Auckland and the broader economy," he said.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
Most listened to
- Business Week in Review with Grant Walker & Andrew Patterson
- Matthew Hooton on the state of the British Labour party under Jeremy Corbyn
- Rodney Hide on the Ombudsman’s investigation into SSC conduct of MFAT leaks inquiry
- David Cohen on how to walk out of a TV interview
- Imperial Tobacco lobbyist insists NZ visit about “contributing expertise,” not pressuring government on plain packaging law