The showdown between workers and bosses on the Auckland’s wharves has finally arrived.
The sacking of all the wharfies ensures that this industrial dispute has just become the most confrontational of our times.
There will now be all sorts of court action – by employers to prevent other workers supporting their Auckland colleagues with strike action, and by the Maritime Union to challenge the Ports of Auckland restructuring process – but the real action will be decided by raw industrial muscle. Which side has the most industrial strength?
Time is running out for a negotiated settlement and the stakes really couldn’t be higher for the union, its members and the management of the Ports of Auckland.
Politically, this will rapidly increase the pressure on Auckland Mayor Len Brown.
Seeing him standing on the sidelines and watching the Council-owned company lay into the union will infuriate the political networks that got him elected – listen, for example, the CTU’s Helen Kelly on RNZ
this morning complaining that Brown has ‘had his time to get his shit together on this, and he’s let us down’. See also, TVNZ’s Len Brown accused of 'absolutely disgusting' attitude
. On top of that there seems to be broader concern in Auckland about the management of the ports company, not just in terms of industrial relations, but also its expansion plans.
If the dispute is ‘class war’, then some Auckland employers haven’t got the memo. Jenny Keown reports that a union and business coalition, including Mainfreight, Bell Gully, and Simpson Grierson is asking to meet with Brown and has drafted a charter for the ports that includes more progressive environmental and labour relations – see: Union, business groups meet over Auckland port
John Minto looks at the broader trend of employer demands for greater flexibility and contracting out in Workers made to pay the price
. Minto currently works for Unite union, which represents fast food and hospitality workers who have worked for many years under the conditions being proposed at the Ports of Auckland. He warns that ‘There is a lot at stake on the Auckland port. It's not just 300 permanent jobs because other employers are watching carefully to see if they can use the same approach to add more to their profits at the expense of workers’.
Government employees under pressure from austerity measures are also starting to get militant. One of the increasingly popular weapons in the public servant’s arsenal is the use of leaks, as evidenced in Matthew Backhouse’s article, Senior diplomat slams Mfat cuts in leaked cable
. Public servants have taken to Twitter and there is talk of protest marches, social media activism, and creative street performances – see Andrea Vance’s must-read article, Public servants plan to bite back against cuts
David Farrar does the Government’s work in replying to this, with his blog post, Will the Empire strike back
. Farrar says that such austerity requirements are a simple fact that opponents cannot escape: ‘The deficit has been running at around $10b a year. That is several times larger than the cost of the entire civil service’. He effectively challenges Labour and any other opposition to come up with an alternative credible plan to deal with the growing deficit.
Chris Trotter answers that challenge – see his blog post, Intensifying The Vicious Circle
. As well as putting forward some social democratic policy proposals for dealing with the economic downturn, Trotter warns against the Government’s fiscally austere response, suggesting it will make things much worse: ‘New Zealand is thus caught in a vicious circle, with falling revenues necessitating further cuts in spending, triggering more economic contraction, more unemployment, reduced consumer spending, lower profits and falling real wages. The Government’s tax-take will fall correspondingly, depressing its revenues still further’.
In a must-read opinion piece – Harder to smile in face of second term-itis
- Vernon Small says there has been a clear mood shift against the Government since the election and the asset sales, ongoing leaks, deteriorating financial forecasts and cost cutting are challenging John Key now, let alone in a few weeks when rumoured radical state sector changes may be announced. Small makes what is likely to be a dreaded comparison with National in the early-1990s: ‘Watching the House yesterday was like a blast from the past, circa the Bolger-Shipley government; leaks from public servants, unpopular asset sales, economic woes, and tough cost cutting.’
All items are contained in the attached PDF. Below are the links to the items online.
Ports of Auckland dispute
Law Commission media proposals