Why the government can’t afford to be too stimulating
Today’s infrastructure announcements from the government should provide a welcome boost for the economy, even though the $500 million spend is hardly earth shattering.
But too much stimulus - and it is not difficult to have too much – and ministers risk an inflationary surge and large interest rate hikes just as they head into the next election.
Today’s announcement focuses on spending on roads, housing and schools.
Most, if not all of the work, has already been planned and it appears the announcement, being made by Prime Minister John Key and Finance Minister Bill English, will simply be bringing them forward.
There is already a fair surge of stimulation working its way through the New Zealand economy.
On the monetary side, the Reserve Bank has more than halved interest rates over the past six months and will continue cutting for until April or maybe even June.
The official cash rate was 8.25% just over six months ago: it is now 3.5% and likely to go to 2%.
It is very important to remember interest rate changes have a lag effect of 12 to 18 months before they fully work their way through the economic system.
To some extent this stimulus is offset by the other side of the monetary policy ledger – the exchange rate. This has fallen more than 25c against the US dollar since the middle of the year and is likely to continue to do so.
That should start making imports more expensive but imports that are essential –especially fuel and products made from petroleum products – will still have to be paid for. That is not stimulatory but it is certainly inflationary.
Finally, of course, there are tax cuts. The first round was prised out of Michael Cullen’s trembling and resentful hands last October: a second batch begins on April 1, with more in April 2010 and 2011.
The backdrop to all this is the Budget.
And for political reasons, the Budget cannot be a damp squib. It can’t be too stimulatory, either. One of the reasons Standard & Poor's put New Zealand on credit watch four weeks ago was concerns of too much relaxation of the Crown accounts.
A credit rating downgrade is not just some pointy-headed economic exercise.
It will affect what interest rates New Zealand pays to borrow overseas – and since, at any one time, at least 40% of New Zealand’s bank borrowing is sourced overseas we need to be concerned about this.
And it is why, for example, ANZ National Bank chief economist Cameron Bagrie has said that “the ball is very much in Bill English’s court.”
Why is too much stimulus bad?
In a word, inflation. Since the great freeing up of the New Zealand economy between 1984-92, the New Zealand economy has come through two recessions and in both cases it has emerged far more quickly and with greater velocity than anyone has anticipated.
Indeed, even in New Zealand’s more controlled era, the economic bounceback from recessions in, for example, 1957-58 and 1967-68 were far more dramatic than was expected at the time.
We are a small economy, which can swing around very quickly.
And we have seen an inflationary surge.
If the interest rate stimulus is still working through, and if the government is still piling on spending increases to go with the already planned tax cuts, New Zealand could see an unpleasantly over-stimulated economy coming out of the current downturn.
Which could in turn see Reserve Bank governor Alan Bollard put up interest rates almost as drastically as he is now cutting them.
The timing of any recovery is never easy to predict but there is a fair chance of it being around two years or so away.
An inflationary surge and interest rate hikes, just as the election looms, is obviously not something ministers would want.
Today’s announcement should not be a total washout. But it would be better if there is not too much to get excited about.
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit














Comments and questions4
One cannot begin to guess where Rob gets his economic news from, but his theory I believe, is sadly off the mark. Be great if he was right and we bounced back fast. But the indicators dont point in that direction. Rob, tell me the inflationary effect of rapidly rising unemployment? Oh, its not inflationary, but you don't know the massive rise in unemployment that is happening and has been for the past few months.
Tax cuts, yeah right. The average increase is hardly enough even with the recirculatory effect, to even begin to offset the massive drop in spending that NZ is experiencing. Try going into any small business and ask them what % drop in sales they have had in the last 12 months?
We need the Goverment to act strongly and decisively in a number of areas. Not least of which is some reform of the tax regs to cure the RB's problems in measuring inflation.
Around the world, recent government efforts to fight the recession have been early and strong. In Australia they are fighting to prevent recession. The massive sums thrown at the problem are concerning. Apart from the economic distortion intervention poses two risks; inflation and sovereign debt default..
The current crisis is like holding a spring tide. It is impossible and wastes precious resources which will be needed to prevent a disorderly collapse of markets. Governments also need to conserve resources to reinject liquidity, when the recessionary fire is close to burning itself out.
Keynesian stimulatory spending by government was very effective in ending the 1930's depression because the spending came late in the cycle. Subsequent Keynesian action aimed at preventing recession has been arguably less effective, because it tried to preserve the unsustainable status quo.
It would be better for governments to allow recession do the job of cleaning up the mess that borrowers and financiers have created. This would wipe out the foolish and free assets to be owned by more cautious managers.
Help for those facing unemployment and hardship is essential, because it provides targeted help. But not some big spend up as in Australia where they just wrote everyone a big cheque.
Protecting the banking system from collapse is also necessary, but bad banks must be allowed to fail on an orderly fashion.
There are terrible consequences for hasty, ill-considered action. We are in the midst of big recession and economic crisis. It will require careful management of limited government resources. Yes, governments can borrow wildly and print money, but do not have infinitely deep pockets.
Please don’t have a champagne party on credit, in the hope will be OK in the morning. The result will only be a hang-over, on top of a mortgagee sale.
It is foolish thinking to thing any government can spend tax payers money or go into debt to halt or shorten a recession. Unless the government spending shows a good return on investment (which is very unlikely) the spend-up will only lengthen the recession. Our problem is too much debt for the return being received. A spend-up will only increase the debt. All a government at this stage can really do is encourage productivity increases by reducing red tape and taxes.
What the government and reserve banks should have been doing over the last 10 years or so, in addition to encouraging the productivity increases, is following policies discouraging too much debt.
It is quite easy to find which individuals (including economists, financial reports) and companies understand economics. They are the ones with a large amount of their wealth or reserves in cash. They knew five years ago what was going to happen. Pity we had no MP's or a Reserve Banks who get it!
Credit Agencies have no credit. Look at their handling of the credit crunch and the ratings that they gave to some products. Absolutely ridiculous. They are in a rock and a hard place and I consider their input untrustworthy.
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below