New Zealand taxpayers are right to question whether they should subsidise Greenpeace, one of the group's founders says.
Canadian ecologist Patrick Moore, a former Greenpeace International director who helped found and lead the group, says it appears Greenpeace's major aim these days is to confuse the public about the nature of the environment and the place of humans in it "by spreading falsehoods and innuendo".
"Since I left Greenpeace, its members, and the majority of the movement, have adopted policy after policy that reflects their anti-human bias, illustrates their rejection of science and technology and actually increases the risk of harm to people and the environment," he says.
Dr Moore's comments, in today's National Business Review Print edition, follow a Court of Appeal decision allowing Greenpeace to challenge a decision to refuse it charity status.
Meanwhile, NBR economics editor Rob Hosking explodes the manufacturing crisis myth with an unexpectedly good manufacturing output result.
He reports while manufacturing output is yet to return to pre-GFC levels it has been gradually improving since mid-2009.
Given the time of year, the Shoeshine column hands out its annual awards including the Ross Taylor trophy for Biggest Scapegoat and the Harry Flashman Yellow Ribbon for Corporate Spinelessness.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
Most listened to
- Listen to the week’s top business news on NBR Radio’s week in review
- Prime Minister John Key would be better off doing the things he tells people he will do, says Matthew Hooton
- Paula Bennett is “thrilled” by the ban on three Wicked Camper vans, says Rodney Hide
- Michael Wigley says Uber may have inadvertently opened itself to action under competition law
- Tim Hunter on the Z Energy-Chevron deal