New Zealand taxpayers are right to question whether they should subsidise Greenpeace, one of the group's founders says.
Canadian ecologist Patrick Moore, a former Greenpeace International director who helped found and lead the group, says it appears Greenpeace's major aim these days is to confuse the public about the nature of the environment and the place of humans in it "by spreading falsehoods and innuendo".
"Since I left Greenpeace, its members, and the majority of the movement, have adopted policy after policy that reflects their anti-human bias, illustrates their rejection of science and technology and actually increases the risk of harm to people and the environment," he says.
Dr Moore's comments, in today's National Business Review Print edition, follow a Court of Appeal decision allowing Greenpeace to challenge a decision to refuse it charity status.
Meanwhile, NBR economics editor Rob Hosking explodes the manufacturing crisis myth with an unexpectedly good manufacturing output result.
He reports while manufacturing output is yet to return to pre-GFC levels it has been gradually improving since mid-2009.
Given the time of year, the Shoeshine column hands out its annual awards including the Ross Taylor trophy for Biggest Scapegoat and the Harry Flashman Yellow Ribbon for Corporate Spinelessness.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
Most listened to
- Business Week in Review with Grant Walker & Andrew Patterson
- Matthew Hooton on the state of the British Labour party under Jeremy Corbyn
- Rodney Hide on the Ombudsman’s investigation into SSC conduct of MFAT leaks inquiry
- David Cohen on how to walk out of a TV interview
- Imperial Tobacco lobbyist insists NZ visit about “contributing expertise,” not pressuring government on plain packaging law