Internet termination as a potential penalty for illegal file sharing continues to raise hackles, as lobbyists and commentators respond to proposed changes to the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill.

A new “guilty until proven innocent” provision has been flagged as a second cause for concern.

READ ALSO: Internet disconnection still option in revised file-sharing bill

Paliament's commerce select committee has recommended several changes to the Copyright (infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill – most notably a compromise on internet account termination.

The bill will repeal controversial s92a of the Copyright Act and put in place a three-notice regime (to be sent from ISPs to their customers) to deter illegal file sharing.

An extended Copyright Tribunal will be given the jurisdiction to run a fast track process for illegal file sharing claims and will be able to award penalties of up to $15,000.

Cutting off internet connections for illegal downloads is akin to cutting off power or phone access, the Commerce Select Committee was told this week.

The committee sat this morning to hear further submissions on the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill, designed to curb illegal music and video downloads and replace the controversial section 92A of the Copyright Act.

In response to industry outrage over sections of the newly passed copyright amendment bill, the government has allowed a slight time extension to assist ISPs in coming to grips with their new responsibilities.

The changes to copyright legislation covering new digital technology such as iPods and computers will take effect on October 31, with the exception of the controversial section 92a, which will come into effect in February 28.