Member log in

Average NZ internet speed just 2.97Mbit/s - Akamai

Chorus is rolling out faster broadband, at 10Mbit/s-plus, but people aren’t buying. The Telecommunications Commissioner has a theory why - and it involves a new focus for the commission - TV.

Respected global service provider Akamai has released its latest survey of average broadband speeds - and New Zealand rates 35th in the world for the three months to September 2009.

Kiwis’ average broadband speed is a mere 2.97Mbit/s (a 10.4% improvement over the previous quarter).

Overall, the survey found many countries were consumers didn't want to pay for the fastest DSL or fibre plans on offer.

Source: Akamai

The Akamai rating comes at a time when Telecom’s Chorus division is half way through its government-mandated, $2.4 billion (and counting) project to roll-out fibre-to-the-node (roadside cabinets that shorten the amount of copper between your home and Telecom’s nearest fibre) and other initiatives to boost its network.

With the NBN not yet underway, it’s the largest single telecommunications infrastructure upgrade across Australasia.

Its aim: to provide 80% of New Zealanders with 10Mbit/s or faster connections by the end of next year.

The raw bandwidth is there
A Chorus rep told Keallhauled yesterday:

“To date, 1,732 Whisper cabinets have been deployed connecting more than 338,000 customers. The average broadband speed in an upgraded area is 13Mbit/s.

“Almost 1 million homes and businesses (56% of Chorus’ 1.8m access lines) are now within reach of high-speed broadband from either their local telephone exchange or one of our upgraded roadside cabinets.”

Yet Akamai finds the average Kiwi is connecting at only a fraction of Chorus’ average rated speed (for upgraded areas).

And Akamai - as a company that provides caching services (local mirroring of international content) for many of the world’s biggest websites - is in an excellent position to judge actually broadband performance.

So what gives?

Telecommunications Commissioner Ross Patterson seized on the Akamai survey during his speech to the Tuanz Telecommunications Day conference on Tuesday.

But few apparently few takers
The problem is not with Chorus, whose relentlessly on-time upgrade project is widely respected across the industry.

Rather, the Commerce Commission regulator identified a mismatch between supply and demand.

“Many consumers still favour lower cost low speed plans, notwithstanding faster speeds are available to them,” said Dr Patterson.

He noted the problem was barely unique to New Zealand.
In fact, notably, in Japan, 90% of households have access to fibre connections (the highest penetration rate in the world) but only 30% have taken it up.

As a result the Japanese Government is considering separation of NTT (the Japanese equivalent of Telecom), said Dr Patterson.

People want more than speed: TV drives updake
The Telecommunications Commissioner said the lesson to be learned from few consumers taking advantage of faster broadband, worldwide, was that a raw speed boost was not enough.

Echoing earlier comments by OECD economist Taylor Reynolds, Dr Patterson said:

“What this suggests is that the time has come to not only focus on the supply side of telecommunications services, but also to take more account of the demand side.

“The 2006 reforms have already achieved a lot; New Zealand is no longer a laggard in terms of infrastructure investment and availability.

“There has however been a lack of uptake on the demand side; when consumers are faced with paying for improved broadband services, they have chosen not to do so.

“It is significant that, in particular in Europe, uptake of fast broadband services by consumers has been driven by demand for HDTV products delivered by telecommunications companies.

“It is apparent that similar offerings are not available to New Zealand consumers. This may be one of the reasons for a lack of demand (or more accurately, a lack of willingness to pay) for high speed services. This is a matter the commission will be looking at in 2010/2011.”

Sky TV's rebuttal
Directly after Dr Patterson wrapped up his speech, 2degrees founder Tex Edwards sprang to his feet and asked if his comments meant the commissioner was “going to bust the emerging pay TV monopoly” (or Sky TV, as he later clarified to Keallhaulled).

Sky TV chief executive John Fellet, however, has long said the boot is on the other foot.

Previously, Mr Fellet has told Keallhaulled he would be happy to reanimate Sky TV’s internet TV (IPTV) service. But first, he needs ISPs to offer unlimited data plans.

More by this author

Comments and questions
25

US ranked 22 at 3.7 Mbps
UK at 3.7Mbps
Australia at 2.095Mbps

Seems like we dont do too bad.
Perhaps the conclusion is that if we build really really fast connections then people will suddenly want to spend on faster plans.

Build it and they will come. Wasnt that a catchphrase of the tech boom in the late 1990's????
Anyone remember what happened to those companies that built lots of dark fibre all over the US and the world??

This is one indicator of broadband health in NZ; it doesn’t mean our broadband infrastructure is 40th in the world. It is merely a measurement of one service within NZ. I'm glad we didn't go down the 'NZ BB is the worst int he world' line :)

A better indicator is to look at our population, broadband penetration and infrastructure investment and see if we are getting returns on this.

Are broadband speeds increasing year on year? Quarter on Quarter?
Who is investing in NZ Broadband Infrastructure? And how much?
What are the trends for broadband usage?
Are people downloading more? More of what?
Is our broadband penetration increasing?
What are the most popular browsing activities in NZ?
Where does most of our traffic come from? Local? International?

Are we investing proportionally the same amount of capital into broadband infrastructure as other countries, taking in account;
- Population
- Geography
- BB Penetration

Is it a meaningful comparison in comparing us to Australia, the UK or the US? I’d venture it isn’t. There are almost no similarities in population, penetration or geography.

Who wants to buy ultra fast broadband if you still have a data cap? It just means you reach your data cap sooner and are hit with the exorbitant excess data fees.

C'mon ISPs, remove the data caps! Heaps of other countries offer affordable, unlimited data plans.

Do these countries have the same proximity to the 'data' that we do? I think not. It just isn't financially viable for an ISP to offer an unlimited plan in NZ ... unless you shape the heck out of it.

[Taylor Reynolds, the Paris-based OECD economist in Wellington for the Tuanz conference, was asked a similar question. He said Iceland was similarly isolated, but managed to have unlimited data plans - CK]

And yet Canada isnt isolated but has data caps on 100% of its plans.

Of the 30 OECD countries 13 have explicit data caps.

Heaps of other countries HAVE data caps. Almost half of the OECD countries have them.
And some countries, like the US, would love to introduce data caps but struggle to close the gate after the horse has bolted. Fair use policy is the best they can employ to limit the data hogs.
Not having data caps hasnt exactly put the US in the top echelon of speed. Data caps are a red herring.

I think you are totally, totally wrong.Read 4g data here:
http://www.oecd.org/document/54/0,3343,en_2649_34225_38690102_1_1_1_1,00.html
13 countries have data caps - true. 2 countries have 100% of the plans available with data caps - Canada & Australia.

Telecom have Big Time which is uncapped. But it is HEAVILY shaped during any time that is usable. "Shaped" seems to be a nice word to cut right back in speed.

The problem with bandwidth in NZ all goes back to when TelstraClear and Telecom both decided they wanted to keep their toys in their own sandpit, and charge other ISPs through the nose for peering contracts.

That skewed the internet access in NZ heavily in favour on the monopoly networks, and basically removed any incentive to try and create a 'national traffic' IPTV service, the likes of a Sky TV IPTV, Tivo, Freeview, a local Hulu, BBC On Demand, or a competitor.

Things have picked up with the likes on TV On Demand for TVNZ and TV3, but it still lacks the back catalogue of content. And the cheaper national traffic that would have previously been wholesale commodity priced - like Paradise's 1/10th charging - skyrocketed up to international costs, as ISPs routed traffic to APE, or worse, through the USA and back again.

The new agreement between Telecom and FX Networks is a nice start - devil is in the details there - but until the ISPs in NZ go back to the open peering arrangement that came about with the likes of WIX, there is still disincentive to create online content demand on a commercial basis.

we have one decent connection, the Southern Cross Cable, and they gouge prices like nobody's business.

If I were the govt I'd be investing my $1.5bn in a new cable.

As it is I hope the Pacific Fibre guys get off the ground in a hurry because that's the only way we'll get better prices.

Most NZers send/receive data overseas. 90% of web traffic goes to the US. That's the real problem here.

Is the SX link congested?

Local caching, servers etc would possibly help speed up the internet.... but why would Telecom as a part owner of the Southern Cross Cable be vaguely interested in that?

Ditto transfer of the xtramail servers to the Yahoo servers in Australia and I'm guessing bounced off somewhere in the US.

If I was into conspiracies, I'd be even more worried about what kind of divine assistance will be required for SaaS devotees if someone manages to drag the cable behind a trawler or the USS Seawolf stuffs up a splicing mission.

You assume that telecom don't have caches already ... or any other ISP for that matter, this article is about the industry, Akamai don't differentiaite between ISPs.

Okay before this turns into a total winge-fest how about we ask a few simple questions - Did Akmai disclose their methodologies? Do we know how the speeds were measured? Is there any fine print (e.g. is this an average, how are burst speeds measured?, did the samples include multiple access technologies such as cable, dsl and fibre etc)

The devil is in the detail with this stuff. I personally think that that OECD is helping network equipment vendors get fat as we all race headlong into faster speeds for as yet unspecificied requirements

Chorus may be getting you "fast speeds" from your door to the local exchange DSLAM, the real bottleneck is the Telecom mandated 32kb/s per user that they will supply the data to the ISPs at. So if an ISP has 20k DSL customers Telecom will only interconnect with them over a constrained 640mb/s pipe - that will only support about 50 customers running at 13mb/s each.

Lots of content is cached already

to listen to internet radio you only need ~128kbit/sec
youtube you need approximately 256kbit/sec
vimeo HD you need approximately 900kbit/sec
We already get this.

What will a higher sync speed with the local dslam get us? Our international pipe is tiny.

I dont require more bandwidth. I use my rss reader for information, this uses almost nothing, no pictures or JS or java or flash.

Im more interested in mobile data.wimax.wifi.

NICEEE, thanks for tip!

Friv

This is really so nice. I appreciate the effect. pneumonia symptoms

I appreciate your work, the post is really helpful. I found so many interesting stuff in your blog especially its discussion. It's some pretty great info, I appreciate the information you provided is excellent post. Thank you.
The World Current Affairs

This speed is still better than Indians. Our average speed is around 512 kbps.

Golf simulator

Things have picked up with the likes on TV On Demand for TVNZ and TV3, but it still lacks the back catalogue of content. And the cheaper national traffic that would have previously been wholesale commodity priced - like Paradise's 1/10th charging - skyrocketed up to international costs, as ISPs routed traffic to APE, or worse, through the USA and back again. Phlebotomy
Jobs

A better indicator is to look at our population, broadband penetration and infrastructure investment and see if we are getting returns on this.
lupus symptoms and signs

Internet speed is indeed very important especially if you are doing business. Anyway, thank you for sharing.

nitro shock

Supply & Demand is everything when it comes to a market like this. Internet speed is going to play a huge role in the next few years for those that want to rise above. http://www.yourphlebotomytrainingguide.com

I think that Supply & Demand is everything when it comes to a market like this. Internet speed is going to play a huge role in the next few years for those that want to rise above. http://www.yourphlebotomytrainingguide.com

I think that Supply & Demand is everything when it comes to a market like this. Internet speed is going to play a huge role in the next few years for those that want to rise above. http://www.yourphlebotomytrainingguide.com

Post new comment or question

Login to use your NBR member name
Full HTML is not supported but you can use the following tags in your comments:
Link: <url>link</url>
Quote: <quote>text</quote>