Telecom’s 5 biggest headaches: part 1 - mobile
This week I’ll be looking at Telecom’s five biggest headaches, and how to solve them. Collect the set.
FINDING BETTER MOBILE CUSTOMERS
Today, Telecom holds 47% share of the mobile market, but only 35% of the revenue. Vodafone’s current monopoly on W-CDMA (most phone makers have simply stopped releasing models for Telecom’s CDMA) means it hogs most of the high-end consumer and business customers.
Telecom’s new W-CDMA 3G network, launching June, will level the playing field. The ex-state telco will finally have not just a single BlackBerry, but many BlackBerries and the latest, hottest models. Finally, we’ll have Telecom phones with SIM cards. Nice. And at some point, iPhone too (for RIM, Apple and others always favour more than one carrier, all networks being more or less equal).
Chief executive Paul Reynolds also sees Gen-i becoming more competitive after “T-day”, able to throw in better mobile options when it’s pitching for business. And he’s quite right, it will, especially as Gen-i chases juicy unified communications deals against the likes of HP/EDS. (A face of the future: Gen-i boss Chris Quin, who’s totting an iPhone running on Telecom’s 3G network, already operational for inbound roaming – a $100 million market that Vodafone currently holds 90% of, by ABN Amro’s estimate).
Sure NZ Communications may finally launch around April – possibly as Virgin Mobile NZ - with its hybrid network that includes its own cell sites, plus those piggybacking on Telecom and Vodafone towers. But an insider at an industry lobby group doesn’t see it cherry-picking many high-end customers. Big accounts will want it to prove itself for at least 12 months before they do any deals.
Do expect NZ Comms to have an impact on the Commerce Commission's coming determination on mobile termnation rates, however, or the money that telcos charge each other (then on-charge to you) when calls cross between their networks. A lower - or even zero - MTR fee could wipe tens of millions from Telecom and Vodafone's revenue.
No guidance
So Telecom should do better in mobile, but Mr Reynolds would not elaborate in any deal for NBR at Telecom’s Q2 briefing. The only solid metric he’d offer was that Telecom is aiming for 50% market share. If I were a shareholder, I’d want much more detailed guidance than that surrounding this make-or-break move.
Certainly, the only way is up. In its first-half result announced Friday, Telecom's mobile revenue fell 6% to $399 million.
An expensive game of leap-frog
Telecom is spending $574 million on its W-CDMA changeover (and the cost of keeping its old CDMA network open), which could be termed the self-inflicted half of Telecom’s profit-destroying capex bubble (the rest coming government-inflicted costs associated with operational separation).
But while the $574 million spend up will redress Theresa’s Folly of sticking with CDMA long after it had become obvious she was backing the wrong horse, it’s just the start of a long, expensive game of cellular leap-frog.
From its launch, Telecom is promising speeds of up to 14Mbit/s on its new network, as long as your cellphone supports HSPA+ (and presumably this full-throttle option will only be available in limited areas from T-Day; half of the $574 million spend is planned for Telecom’s 2009/2010 FY).
That will give it a theoretical top speed above that of Vodafone’s HSPA network, which tops out at 7Mbit/s (in practice HSPA has such a tiny slither of coverage so far that I’ve almost never got a signal, an top out around 1.7Mbit/s). Vodafone says it won’t bother adding HSPA+ support yet, since there aren’t any HSPA+ phones available yet.
Regardless, something during 2010 or beyond, Vodafone will upgrade its mobile network to LTE (so-called “4G”) technology, which will boost cellular download speed to a landline-like 20Mbit/s or faster (in fact, LTE will support speeds of more than twice that, but actual speed will be dependent on factors such as how many customers are accessing an LTE base station at one time).
Such 4G technology will arrive, as sure as night follows day. Overseas, many carriers are already poised to follow the LTE upgrade path, as analyst Paul Budde noted earlier for NBR.
Across the ditch, Telstra has already gone live with its 21Mbit/s "NextG" HSPA+ network, with a possible upgrade to 42Mbit/s at the end of this year.
That means around 2010 or 2011, Telecom will have to find another whack of money for a fresh mobile upgrade of its own. At least this time, it’ll be following an evolutionary upgrade, rather than having to junk its old network and start again.
Incidentally, at its Q2 presentation, Dr Reynolds said New Zealand's 110% mobile penetration could slow growth. Not so, according to ABN Amro analysts Geoff Zame, who notes that many European markets have 150% penetration, largely thanks to the proliferating number of 3G modems, dongles and other SIM-card packing accessories.
Signup to free NBR email alerts here

Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit
















Comments and questions15
What happened to the $33M Telecom spent selecting the wrong frequency? They bought the network equipment then had to write it off.
Who was responsible for these descisions and what are the implications of these decisions.
There has never been senior management commercial responsibility for major decisions.
$33M would go a long way any "normal" company.
Do we mention Ferrit at $1M per month in expenditure?
My only comment is that thankfully I am not a shareholder.
Regards
Mark K
At its Q2 results briefing, Telecom said it still hopes to sell the leftover GSM gear, which could mitigate the loss. Watch out for a listing on trademe, or eBay, I guess.
Telecom is one of only a handful of large companies remaining where senior management staff is virtually never held accountable for fiscal and strategic blunders. The $33M debacle doesn't scratch the surface compared to years of lack of leadership, lack of acountability, and incomprehensible bureacracy that has paralyzed Telecom's ability to advance in this industry. What they need is a top-down wholesale replacement of much of their management team, which is about as likely as their stock price getting back to double digits in the coming weeks.
intense business stance next
"(in practice HSPA has such a tiny slither of coverage so far that I’ve almost never got a signal, an top out around 1.7Mbit/s)"
I think you will find this statement is similar to what you wrote when you reviewed the Vodem Stick several months ago. Not only is the statement out of date - but you have also not undertaken a recent test of areas that do have a 7.2Mbit deployment in place - right now; namely Auckland Airport & Waiheke Island, of which deliver far greater than 1.7Mbit throughput.
There are also other areas that now have 7.2Mbit deployed - but the primary focus for Vodafone right now is beating (by June 2009) Telecom to have 97% Coverage with full 3G services, or in other words, every 2G site, will soon be 3G. Voice/Speed is vastly improved & it beats the pants off GPRS fall back, once you are out of the cities.
Vodafone will also be improving backhaul on their network, with improvements in this area happening after the 900Mhz UMTS Network is rolled out, I would imagine.
and as the rest of the world's GSM networks get switched off, that 900MHz spectrum will rapidly become 3G spectrum, and once again Telecom will find it's in the smaller camp with fewer handsets and will struggle to find roaming partners.
Vodafone has been consistent with its technology right from word go. Customers have been able to rest assured that tomorrow they won't discover their new phones are obsolete.
I'd ask some of those poor dumb folk who bought Telecom's latest round of "smart toys" whether they're so smart now. Every one of Telecom's 100,000 broadband mobile customers is now in the market and up for grabs - Vodafone and NZ Comms are well placed to take advantage of Telecom's constant chopping and changing.
"...redress Theresa’s Folly of sticking with CDMA long after it had become obvious she was backing the wrong horse..."
It's nice to know (but not if you were or are a shareholder) that NZ is up there with the UK and the US in having CEOs who were on large salaries whilst single-handedly destroying the company they were in charge of.
Perhaps a job in banking next, Theresa...
One high point in this discussion is that Ms Gattung has failed to attract an offer of employment since 'standing down'. What should, however, be noted is that most of the decisions that have resulted in the destruction of over $2.5 billion of Telecom shareholder funds were made not by her but by her predecessor, chairman and mentor - who is still at the helm of several significant NZ businesses. Rod has MANY DOLLARS to explain to many people!
that Vodaphone is one of the very largest companies in the world - able to leverage economies of scale on par with small-medium sized countries. Even so, their systems and technologies are far from perfect, as is the company's customer service.
Many of the problems faced by Telecom are no more than those faced by any small business duking it out, so to speak, against other prize fighters many times it's weight.
As governments have successivly reduced the position Telecom enjoyed, the company increasinly finds itself fighting an uphill battle against companies, such as Vodaphone, with massive resources - to the likes of Vodaphone, Telecom's current upgrade is peanuts.
What Telecom does have for it is a new and more optimistic vision - far removed from the old squeeze and underinvest strategy.
It's future depends on smart management, like all relatively small businesses that are swiming with the big sharks.
that the decision to go with CDMA is one which the government of the day forced onto Telecom, wrongly believing that different technology platforms would encourage more competition in the market. Warwick Dean, then Telecom CEO, resisted but was shouted down. It was not Teresa's decision to adopt CDMA, nor was it (entirely) Telecom's.
I think Roderick Dean had the fortitude, and connections, to set his own path. And certainly, after she replaced him in 1999 Theresa Gattung had every opportunity to switch mobile technology paths.
How can you be so naive Chris-Keall?
When he 'passed the CEO baton' to Ms. Gattung, Roderick took on the position of Chairman. Do you really think he would have allowed her to trash his technology decision and go the way-of-the-world? Rod's ego would never permit that, any more than it would permit him to stand-down from his other directorships as well as Telecom after having to write-off TWO BILLION DOLLARS of shareholder funds that he wasted in his drive to show what an international player he was!
Like many others of his ilk, Mr. Deane had little regard for shareholders when it came to the way Telecom funds were used, and great regard for his own ego. Taking a nice little domestic player, that generated huge amounts of cash, into the international market rather than returning funds to shareholders was purely an ego issue. I, and my fellow shareholders, have been paying for that ego ever since - TWICE.
That man should today have no role in NZ business of any kind. However, he still has a role directing the course of He Fletcher Building Limited, the New Zealand Seed Fund and Woolworths Limited.
Eamin his prior roles and you will find directorships of ANZ National Bank Limited, Te Papa Tongarewa (the Museum of New Zealand), the City Gallery Wellington, Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (12 years until June 2006) MOTU (Economic and Public Policy Research), Chairman of the State Services Commission, Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (and previously Chief Economist of the Bank), and an Alternate Executive Director of the International Monetary Fund.
He was Chief Executive of the Electricity Corporation of New Zealand Limited from 1987 to October 1992 and then until 1999, Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of Telecom Corporation of NZ Limited.
How many of these entities succeeded to (never mind beyond) the expectation of investing stakeholders? How many of them would you (retrospectively) have bet your pension on? How rich has this destruction of New Zealand capital made him? Finally, how many of his 'mates' did he appoint to boards in return for being appointed by them?
Mr. Deane is a classic example of the tiny group of people who together have ruined our country's economy and put us in line to potentially be the next bankrupt copuntry! (Hard to believe but look at the facts!) I wonder how many of the others' names you are familiar with!
You need to revisit your facts my friend. The person shouting at the Telecom Table that CDMA was the wrong choice was not Mr. Roderick Deane (Warwick??) but the then Chief Technology Officer! Think about that!
2004 ces capita project dimming fourth satellite
im a student
Can i have a growth chart , showing how telecom was doing since it was introduced in nz . is the market going down for telecom due to vodafone and 2 degree.
please email me, kalvin_is_kewl@hotmail.com
thank you
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below