John Key's billion dollar interview?
How much is a great article worth? About US$1bn, if the subject of the piece happens to be Prime Minister John Key, the publication is the Wall Street Journal, and you just happen to be the ANZ National, according to ubiquitous economics savant Bernard Hickey.
Hickey’s latest online dispatch looks at ANZ National’s recent success in raising US$1 billion through an issue of government-guaranteed three-year bonds to US investors.
The piece toasts the deal because, as Hickey correctly points out, the longer it had been taking for banks to refinance on terms of three years or more, the greater the vulnerability of New Zealand’s banking system.
Unfortunately, the global economic environment generally and S&P’s recent credit downgrade of the country specifically, have made this something of a hard slog for local financial institutions.
But then “something either lucky or very well orchestrated happened,” Hickey marvels. “Prime Minister John Key gave an interview on the 9th floor of the Beehive to Mary Kissel, the editorial page editor of the Wall St Journal Asia.”
The terrific interview, in which Key admittedly took rather a different approach to dealing with the recession than he had in his comments up until then to the New Zealand media, not only gave the premier a zappy notice in his own right, but also unstuck the pockets of international moneymen when ANZ National CEO Graham Hodges went to the United States for a roadshow to promote this US$1 billion bond issue:
“Time and again, Hodges says, investors told him Key’s interview in the Wall St Journal had reassured them, despite the uncertainty of a potential credit rating downgrade. Sometimes it’s a struggle to get foreign investors to look past the shorthand of credit ratings and the headlines of research notes. Key’s interview made them sit up and take notice.”
Hmm. It might also have been, of course, that the interview ultimately had little to do with it, and Hodges has simply wheeled it out as a pleasant diversion from the more pressing matter of where long-term interest rates have been heading since the deal was concluded. (Alternatively, if a one-off interview really did stitch up the deal, what does that say about the lessons in hype that banking institutions haven't learned since last September?)
The fact that Hickey appears to have uncritically swallowed this line suggests that he isn’t quite as sharp a commentator when it comes to media-related subjects as he tends to be on sheerly economic issues.
[Hat tip: Kiwiblog.]
Signup to free NBR email alerts here
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit
















Comments and questions5
This is a great story and has all the hall marks of truth about it. Why you need to sully it with petulant griping aboutis Bernard Hickey really such an astutue commentator, I dont know!
Didn't seem jealous, more like a tad skeptical about one article swinging such a huge figure. Hickey isn't God.
The Key interview probably has had a great impact for NZ . It was one of the most widely read and forwarded on-line pieces that week according to the WSJ's own stats it published on online traffic. The rise in your dollar (while not good for exports) can probably be traced back a little to the interview although it's mostly due to the US increasing it's national debt 12 trillion since January and monetizing it's dollar.
The Key interview probably has had a great impact for NZ . It was one of the most widely read and forwarded on-line pieces that week according to the WSJ's own stats it published on online traffic. The rise in your dollar (while not good for exports) can probably be traced back a little to the interview although it's mostly due to the US increasing it's national debt 12 trillion since January and monetizing it's debt.
David
Many thanks for the link.
It's fair to question just how important the interview was.
The public sourcing I used was Hodges. His comment came unprompted when I asked what international investors had told him about the risk that NZ could be downgraded. He said they referred time and again back to the interview as reassuring them.
I think it's fair to take Hodges comments at face value. He didn't need to trumpet Key. If he was being a true corporate guy he would have trumpeted ANZ's strength and successful roadshows.
Also, two other sources told me before I spoke to Hodges that the interview impressed many international investors. But I couldn't use those names on the record so didn't include them. I don't like using unnamed quotes.
I'm a pretty sceptical chap. Sometimes all the sources don't make it into the story.
But you're quite right to ask the question. I'm no media expert and this wasn't really a media story. It was about how international investors view New Zealand and what they do with their money. They invested US$1 bln in New Zealand at a time when we could be downgraded within weeks. For me, that's the proof for the story.
cheers
Bernard Hickey
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below