GDP pops, then fizzes
Oh no … don’t fizz. Please don’t fizz …
Those interminably cheerful souls, the economics profession, have a term for what we are currently going through.
“Re-balancing”, they call it. Some, perhaps the more exuberant members of the profession, prefer to liken it to the hangover after the party.
The world economic party of 2003-08 saw some particularly over-the-top behaviour.
New Zealand did not quite go so far to mix economic drinks as recklessly as some countries – the United States being the most glaring example of a country which thought it would be a hoot to shove crème de menthe, bitters, and kahlua into one heady brew.
But we’re still hurting. We’re a bit like the hungover bloke who wakes, mixes himself a Berocca and liver salts, and pleads with the glass not to fizz so loudly.
Today’s GDP figures fizzed aggressively. True, the result, 0.9% shrinkage of GDP over the three months to December, wasn’t quite as bad as some were expecting.
But it is still our fourth quarterly negative result in a row, with probably a further two negative quarters to go.
But the rebalancing, the extrusion of toxins from the economic body, is happening.
Durable sales slumped badly – but since most of these purchases are paid for with debt, and since New Zealanders have been hurling back yard-glasses of debt over the past few years, this is necessary.
That slump was a big factor behind today’s February trade balance figures, which showed a surplus of $439 million.
A surplus in trade might seem a good thing – and generally it is – but it is important to remember February almost always shows a surplus, due to being the height of the farming production season. Exports taken as a whole did fall away by about 9% but the drop is almost totally from the manufacturing and petroleum sectors.
But as Bank of New Zealand head of market economics Stephen Toplis observed, exports have probably fallen as far as they are going to. Imports still have a way to drop.
The bigger concern on the imports side is capital goods. Most of New Zealand’s plant and machinery is imported and these imports have dropped right away – as you might expect, with businesses feeling the pinch as the recession bites and with the lower New Zealand dollar pushing the price up.
But that hiatus in investment will hurt the productive capacity of New Zealand’s businesses.
On the household side, the GDP figures showed disposable income dropping 0.9% for the quarter and down 2.5% for the year.
That, as Deutsche Bank New Zealand economist Darren Gibbs pointed out, shows disposable income is shrinking faster than the decline in GDP.
Again, that is part of the rebalancing. A boost though will come from next week, with the next round of tax cuts – let us think of these as a bit of rehydration after the party - kicking in.
Share
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Google
Yahoo
Technorati
Scoopit














Comments and questions2
So, the problem with negative economic growth is that the economy gets smaller? Maybe, but it is just a tautology.
Likewise with businesses reducing investment in productive capacity. What did you expect? while laying off under-used workers they should be buying up new plant and equipment to add to their under-used existing equipment?
Actually cutting investment in new productive capacity is exactly what they should be doing if demand for their products is weakening.
A New Deal at Hallmark Cards:Notice that a pun is used in this title.“A new deal”caJl beunderstood either as“another round of play"or as“a new plan".“Between You and Me”cards:cards with messages to express private feelings.high quality wigs
Post new comment or question
To share this article, click on a service below