Why donate $50K to John Banks in the first place? Dotcom camp explains

Kim Dotcom (@KimDotcom)

KeallHauled

Chris Keall

ACT leader John Banks may now be ruing the day he fell out with Kim Dotcom.

When Dotcom was jailed after the January 20, 2013 raid on his mansion, he reached out to Banks, only to be spurned.

The giant German is now an enthusiastic witness for the prosecution in Banks' election fraud trial.

But NBR's question is not so much why the pair fell out, or whether the two $25,000 cheques were anonymous, but why Dotcom donated $50,000 to the (then) Auckland mayoral candidate in the first place? 

Many trendy-lefty advocates of a free and open internet, who form the natural support base for the political party Dotcom says he'll launch in the new year, must be asking the same thing.

Did Dotcom admire the hardline social conservative Banks' policies? Was he angling for advantage over his citizenship and property purchase applications? Neither answer is particularly satisfying to the liberals and internet freedom advocates considering a vote for Dotcom candidates.

Sure, the $50,000 donation pre-dated the spy bills (voted for by ACT, strongly opposed by Dotcom), and the current phase of Banks' political career. But the ACT leader has always been a conservative with an authoritarian bent. Where was the common ground?

NBR did not manage to put the question to Dotcom, but his colleague Finn Batato did respond, saying: "I can only tell you what I have heard from Kim, which is that John made clear that he is interested in improving the digital business in NZ which is the same interest Kim had and still has."

In The Secret Life of Kim Dotcom, David Fisher writes, "Dotcom said he saw Banks as a forward-thinking politician who was pro-internet and pro-business. 'That's why I gave him the money.'"

Mr Fisher notes that it also emerged that "Banks had lobbied his old friend, Lands Minister Maurice Williamson, over Dotcom's application to purchase the mansion."

Williamson signed off on Dotcom's mid-2011 application to buy the $30 million Coatesville mansion, owned by the Chrisco founders Richard and Ruth Bradley. But the deal also required the support of (then) Justice Minister Simon Power, who declined.

He also writes, "It also emerged that Banks also sought a donation for the ACT Party. He recalled being told "to go get f**ked as your government has caused me too much trouble." The timing would palce it just after the mansion rejection."

UPDATE: On December 4, 2013, shortly after Crown Law took over his electoral fraud prosecution, John Banks said he would stand down as ACT leader at the party's annual meeting March 1, 2014, and not contest the Epsom electorate at the next election.

ckeall@nbr.co.nz

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about My Tags

Post Comment

5 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Maybe John Banks did what most politicians do when soliciting favours, he just plain lied and told Kim Dot Com what he wanted to hear in order to extract the money from him.

Reply
Share

The more we hear from Kim Dotcom the better we like him.

Reply
Share

Speak for yourself. I just want him to get out of the media once and for all.

Reply
Share

When it comes down to it, Kim Dotcom is a business man who is trying to get ahead in his new country. There are a lot of great things about this country, but there are also some issues relating to our size and geographic location.
The government tends to allow us to get pushed around by our allies - this issue with the US one of the bigger bullies. They are used to getting their way, and things go wrong when well meaning public servants pander to their requests when they should be ensuring New Zealand law is followed to the letter. There is no room for bending the rules, and I am disgusted by the reaction of John Key to decide that the best way to fix the problem is to change the law in favour of the bullying USA.
Kim Dotcom is a victim here and I am embarrassed by what the NZ government has allowed to happen to him.
Kim Dotcom has apparently lost his basic rights to have access to evidence held against him! What is the world coming to???
Guilty until proven innocent apparently. Thanks John Key.

Reply
Share

Love him or hate him, he is making waves amongst the politicians, courts and the police, which is all good. Calling out dishonesty and corruption where he sees it can only benefit us all.

Reply
Share

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot

Forex

Sym Price Change
USD 0.7864 -0.0021 -0.27%
AUD 0.9123 0.0039 0.43%
EUR 0.6320 -0.0055 -0.86%
GBP 0.5007 -0.0035 -0.69%
HKD 6.0969 -0.0228 -0.37%
JPY 93.0180 0.1320 0.14%

Commods

Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1201.1 7.690 2014-11-21T00:
Oil Brent 78.6 -0.120 2014-11-21T00:
Oil Nymex 76.5 0.710 2014-11-21T00:
Silver Index 16.4 0.260 2014-11-21T00:

Indices

Symbol Open High Last %
NZX 50 5471.7 5471.7 5471.7 -0.32%
NASDAQ 4725.2 4755.0 4713.0 0.89%
DAX 9722.3 9832.4 9732.5 0.54%
DJI 17812.6 17855.3 17810.1 0.04%
FTSE 6750.8 6764.0 6750.8 -0.31%
HKSE 23883.3 23936.3 23437.1 1.95%
NI225 17285.7 17381.6 17300.9 0.33%