close
2 mins to read

Appeal Court 'misrepresented facts' in Air Nelson-EPMU case

The Court of Appeal misrepresented facts about the Air Nelson/Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union strike breaking case, the Supreme Court was told this morning.At issue is the extent to which employers can replace striking workers with non-striki

Rob Hosking
Tue, 23 Feb 2010

The Court of Appeal misrepresented facts about the Air Nelson/Engineering Printing and Manufacturing Union strike breaking case, the Supreme Court was told this morning.

At issue is the extent to which employers can replace striking workers with non-striking labour.

Air Nelson – an Air New Zealand

Want to read more? It's easy.

Choose your best value subscription option

Get instant access to this article now as part of our FREE two week trial.

Get two weeks free access to NBR’s Premium Online Subscription, which includes full access to all of NBR’s great content on any device.
Individual
Group membership
NBR Marketplace
NZ Aviation News

Yearly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$499.00 / yearly

Monthly Premium Online Subscription

NZ$44.95 / monthly

Smartphone Only Subscription

NZ$24.95 / monthly

Premium Group Membership 10 Users

NZ$350+GST / monthly

$35 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 20 Users

NZ$600+GST / monthly

$30 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 50 Users

NZ$1250+GST / monthly

$25 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Premium Group Membership 100 Users

NZ$1875+GST / monthly

$18.75 per user - Pay by monthly credit card debit

Yearly Premium Online Subscription + NBR Marketplace

NZ$499.00 / yearly

Aviation News - Monthly

NZ$14.95 / monthly

Already have an account? Login
Rob Hosking
Tue, 23 Feb 2010
© All content copyright NBR. Do not reproduce in any form without permission, even if you have a paid subscription.
Appeal Court 'misrepresented facts' in Air Nelson-EPMU case
2816