The Maxim Institute has a very thoughtful discussion paper on poverty. They pose a number of questions, and also outline eight different ways you can measure poverty. (See report below)
They eight ways are:
- Average income threshold – a percentage of mean or median income
- Consumption expenditure – a percentage of amount spent on consumption compared to average household
- Budget standards – based on a budget judged high enough to avoid deprivation
- Component and multiplier – based on amount needed for an essential such as food, and multiplied
- Subjective measures – based on self-assessment as poor
- Benefit-based/statutory measures – based on government definition of minimum income
- Material deprivation indices – based on actually lacking essential necessities
- Multi-dimensional measurement of poverty, deprivation or social exclusion – a mixture of the above and more
No measure is prefect. I don’t like the income measures because they treat all households as identical in terms of needs, and they are more about income spread than actual poverty. They also avoid the effect of tax, as they tend to be on before tax incomes.
My preference is No 7. Stats NZ already do this – an occasional survey asking if families can afford stuff such as more than two pairs of shoes for kids, transport to school etc etc. This is relatively objective, and measures actual deprivation rather than merely equality of income.
Political commentator David Farrar posts at Kiwiblog.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
Most listened to
- Deloitte's Scott McClay discusses which South Island companies are performing best
- TIN100's Greg Shanahan on this year's top trends and top movers in high-tech exports
- ASB senior rural economist Nathan Penny disagrees with ANZ's forecast and is standing by his bank’s $6.75/kgMS prediction
- Why is the FMA exempting robo-advice from the law? Liam Mason explains
- NBR Radio: The best interviews, with Grant Walker — updated daily