Accountant defamation stoush 'much ado about nothing,' NZICA says

Bruce Gray QC told the High Court that comments about CPA Australia in a speech by NZICA's Kristen Patterson were "background noise".

To build your own NBR Radio playlist and enjoy instant on-demand access to any audio, sign up for our FREE smartphone-only subscription to NBR ONLINE.

UPDATEDCPA's defamation case can't succeed because it suffered no loss - court hears

A defamation case brought against the NZ Institute of Chartered Accountants is "much ado about nothing" by rival accounting body CPA Australia, the lawyer representing NZICA said today.

Bruce Gray, QC, appearing before Justice Robert Dobson, told the High Court in Wellington that comments about CPA Australia in a speech by NZICA chief operating officer Kristen Patterson were "background noise" and the thrust of the speech was more concerned with how NZICA was adapting to a more competitive environment. CPA Australia is seeking a declaration of defamation and $50,000 in damages for breaches of the Fair Trading Act.

NZICA had effectively held a statutory monopoly in New Zealand until 2012 when the newly established Financial Markets Authority accredited CPA Australia for auditing work, putting it on a more equal footing with NZICA. CPA Australia alleges NZICA defamed and breached the Fair Trading Act in statements in flyers, advertisements and at industry events that included false comparisons and misrepresentations of issues such as potential earnings, numbers of accountants, global reach and educational standards.

Mr Gray said CPA Australia's growth in New Zealand had been slower than expected and it "was looking for someone to blame." Comments to an industry event by NZICA's Kirsten Patterson about rival CPA Australia were recorded by an audience member on his pen recorder, with the audio played to the court yesterday.

NZICA was merging with the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia at the time, and Ms Patterson sought to explain the changes in the context of a more competitive environment.

In Mr Gray's defence against the defamation, he said Ms Patterson's speech carried qualified privilege, as it was heard by accountants who were able to make up their own minds, and the comments were genuinely her own opinion. There was little proof that NZICA's statements had led to a loss of revenue, profit or goodwill, Mr Gray said.

"Corporates have no personal reputation," Gray said. "They have no feelings to hurt."

CPA Australia's witnesses, who the court heard from earlier, were largely CPA Australia employees or officers, Gray said, who would have heard the speech with "a sensitivity to things said about the plaintiff but the ordinary listener is not like that".

NZICA published advertisements in October 2012 to coincide with its rival's accreditation by the FMA, stating "in accounting there's best practice and then there's second-best practice," which claimed only a member of NZICA had been exposed to the highest levels of industry training and development, which is why top CFOs and CEOs only employed chartered accountants.

Yesterday CPA Australia's legal counsel, Alan Galbraith QC told the court NZICA engaged in "professional denigration" that was "quite extraordinary and offensive" against rival accounting body CPA Australia when it was at its most vulnerable in the early stages of expansion in the local market.

Mr Gray said he intends to call 10 witnesses.

The case continues.

(BusinessDesk)

To build your own NBR Radio playlist and enjoy instant on-demand access to any audio, sign up for our FREE smartphone-only subscription to NBR ONLINE.

2 comments
Login in or Register to view & post comments