Prime minister John Key has not ruled out the possibility of advancing any Maori Council appeal straight to the Supreme Court.
Justice Ron Young is expected to release his decision on last week’s legal challenge to the partial asset sales programme before Christmas.
This would give the government a tight timeline of just two months to complete any potential appeal arising from that decision before the planned selldown of Mighty River Power.
The government wants to sell shares in MRP between March and June next year.
Mr Key says Attorney-General Chris Finlayson will look at whether the case should be "leap-frogged" to the Supreme Court.
Bypassing the Court of Appeal would depend on Justice Young's findings, particularly if it left important issues of law or public interest open for higher deliberation.
Observers of the recent High Court challenge taken by Maori interests to block the asset sale are confident Justice Young will deliver a clear and unequivocal judgment.
“We’ll end up getting legal advice and advice in general on what will happen. The applicants might have a view if they say they want to go straight to the Supreme Court. Chris Finlayson says it’s technically possible to leap frog," Mr Key says.
A joint Justice Ministry/Law Commission discussion document published in December 2009 says appeals from the High Court can leap-frog the Court of Appeal and go directly to the Supreme Court in some circumstances.
In his final comments last week, Justice Young indicated an appeal was likely whatever way he found.
This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags
- Minter Ellison invests $2m in artificial intelligence technology to replace lawyers
- Employers back PM's comments on drugs stopping young people from getting jobs
- Spark-Netflix deal could backfire: lawyer
- No conflict of interest for administrators of Pumpkin Patch
- Currency Talk: What Trump’s address to Congress will mean for the kiwi
Most listened to
- AWF Madison chief executive Simon Bennett says young Kiwis not being able to pass a drug test is “reasonably significant.”
- Scales boss Andy Bowland explains why the board lifted annual guidance again
- Join OMF's Phillip Lindberg and NBR's Andrew Patterson for Currency Talk
- Otago University Professor Andrew Geddis on how election campaigns will change
- Hamilton Hindin Greene's Jeremy Sullivan on why Spark did a deal with Netflix