Brownlee spins recovery, angry residents belie good news

Roger Sutton: Crowd control skills to the fore
Gerry Brownlee: “Recovery” breakfast address

Earthquake Recovery Minister Gerry Brownlee today gave a “recovery” breakfast address at the central Christchurch Ibis Hotel with hand-picked media invited to report the good news story. 

NBR ONLINE was not one.

More than 300 almost universally angry residents of the eastern Avondale suburb last night attended a meeting addressed by Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority Roger Sutton along with representatives from EQC, city council and Department of Building and Housing.

It was the third such meeting in days. There are another 17 to come this month and more are planned for coming months in all areas of the city.

On Monday night more than 600 residents attended a similar meeting at the Shirley Intermediate Hall.

And on Wednesday night the Christchurch East Primary school hall was similarly packed.

None of the meetings were reported in the local daily newspaper. No politicians were present except for a couple of council representatives.

The heat from the gathering crowds is palpable.

While the meetings are ostensibly about the TC3 land classification and foundation repairs, the questions soon morph into an array of individual issues about insurance, delays and the unknown.

The crowd control skills of Roger Sutton come to the fore as staff from other support services take the brunt of difficult and at times abusive questioning.

At one stage he assured the residents that most of his time is focused on residents, not the inner city rebuild. 

The main message which comes from the meetings is that about one third of the relatively undamaged 28,000 TC3 classified homes probably do not have to do anything.

The other others will have a long wait.

There are not enough ground drilling operators, let alone analysts, to determine what the core samples mean.

The drilling programme probably won’t be completed for at least 18 months. Only after the findings are analysed can homeowners turn to Fletchers for repairs.

The delays almost match the delays at EQC for settling claims. When the actual repairs begin is anyone’s guess.

Mr Sutton exhorted people to help the elderly and vulnerable to obtain priority help from their local Fletcher hub.

Everyone else must just make the best of things in once-prized homes that await repairs

Some of the meetings have been filmed and are available on the CERA web site.

2 · Got a question about this story? Leave it in Comments & Questions below.

This article is tagged with the following keywords. Find out more about MyNBR Tags

2 Comments & Questions

Commenter icon key: Subscriber Verified

Of course residents of CHCh are angry and so they should be, the rebuild of CHCh to date has been a joke. There is continuous talk about a lack of tradespeople to carry out the work, when the reality is the work is not there. I have a team of about a dozen in CHCH and I'm struggling to keep them busy. Fetchers just are not performing they have a huge backlog of houses. They have groups of their own staff and some contractors that are not performing but they won't issue backlogged houses to others contractors. And now the government has made an agreement that only 3 manufacturers will supply paint for EQC work, this is supposedly going to save the rebuild a fortune, yet the painter doesn't pay any less for his paint. The government must be getting a big back hander from the suppliers? I wonder what back hander Placemakers will be expected to give when the Government starts limiting the suppliers of other materials?

  • 0
  • 0

“The main message … is that about one third of the relatively undamaged 28,000 TC3 classified homes probably do not have to do anything.”
That leaves two thirds, or 18,000 or so, homes that have to do “something”. What is that “something”? Who does it literally apply to?
We’ve already individually told EQC about errors in their records. But we think – or I do – that EQC has not come to grips with them and taken account of them. Are their projections about how many properties need foundation work taking into account the insurance companies’ requests, on behalf of their clients, for joint review meetings, which could bring down the number of properties under EQC ? If there are say 10,000 properties wanting joint review, EQC’s current TC3 set could potentially come down to 8,000.
On phoning CERA I was told they deal only with land.
Why is Roger Sutton (CERA) attending residents meetings if CERA deals only with land? It is confusing people.
Of course, CERA has a CDU arm which does not deal with land – it deals with central city development, I guess.
I read that VERO has opted out of cooperating with EQC for drilling results because VERO doesn't think EQC's figure work is very good.

  • 0
  • 0

Post New comment or question

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

NZ Market Snapshot


Sym Price Change
USD 0.6788 -0.0068 -0.99%
AUD 0.8994 -0.0039 -0.43%
EUR 0.5756 -0.0066 -1.13%
GBP 0.5145 -0.0047 -0.91%
HKD 5.3030 -0.0505 -0.94%
JPY 76.4580 -1.0050 -1.30%


Commodity Price Change Time
Gold Index 1277.8 -0.310 2017-11-16T00:
Oil Brent 61.3 -0.480 2017-11-16T00:
Oil Nymex 55.1 -0.160 2017-11-16T00:
Silver Index 17.1 0.100 2017-11-16T00:


Symbol Open High Last %
NASDAQ 6742.3 6806.7 6706.2 1.30%
DJI 23365.3 23492.2 23271.3 0.80%